Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The issue with that blanket tactic of "throw a 1:1 sideline 9-route" on heavy pressure 3rd-and-shorts is not that it's completely misguided, as it was the right read given the play calls and the defensive attacks...it's that Dorsey seemed not to anticipate such heavy pressure schemes and therefore design in and correctly time some comebacks, outs, digs, slants and crossers as pressure man-beaters. He, like Daboll before him, seemed to be stuck on a specific and rigid plan even when it didn't always match the moment. 

Posted
10 hours ago, DJB said:


 

 

What a random list. Todd Monken? Really? Based on his NFL track record? Nah.

5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

There weren't as many wtf calls/sequences with Dorsey compared to Daboll.  Daboll's in game adjustments were better though and they played some of their strongest ball in the playoffs.

 

Daboll's offense had higher highs. And more WTF moments. Dorsey's was more stable if that is the right word, but definitely less creative.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

We hate our coaches so much but that’s because we’re basically only rating them on an elite scale. Compared to the rest of the league our coaching staff is very good.


If we had to watch every offensive and defensive snap for every team we would appreciate our coaches more.

 

Dorsey is also a difficult grade because of the Allen injury. A lot of the offense was thrown out due to the pain Allen played with.

 

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:


Why did you expect him to make an overhaul and fix things that were not broken? That would have been the exact opposite of what he should have tried in his first year. 
 

year two would be a year to make more noticeable tweaks if any are needed. 

All I'm saying is that if there's no material improvement in the offense he took over, how can you tell if he is a great coordinator?  Nothing changed. 

 

It's like saying you have a great auto mechanic when all he did was an oil change.  Maybe he's great, maybe he isn't. You cant tell from what he's done. 

 

The one piece of evidence we have is that in the last quarter of the season and in the playoffs the offense wasn't particularly good.  How does that make him top 10?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I would say if your team is second in scoring and second in total yards/game in the NFL, it would be a gross omission for an OC not to be in the top 10 of all OC's no matter the circumstances.

  • Agree 2
Posted
12 hours ago, HereComesTheReignAgain said:

They were #2 in yards per game and points per game in the entire league. What would Dorsey have had to accomplish to get some credit from you?  

I feel like our team is built to absolutely destroy every team that is below the level of great. Then when we play the highest tier great teams we struggle to do much of anything. On both sides of the ball. This got proven in both OC tenure.  It is the same door that opened the same way the year before. But now there is a squeak to it. 

 

Here is my problem. On Offense, you use the same scheme from the year before accept you do not have a guy opening up fast underneath. Beasley lost some steps and you did not have Smoke running deep routs scaring anyone any more. The field was not as open any more... and I blame not Dorsey on much of this but on the GM/HC for not doing nearly enough help on the offensive line to justify not having the talent on the WR's team. That is the "squeaky door" I am referring to. Now we have a new playbook. Better Line. Dalton Kincaid who we all hope he ends up as good as we think he will be.

 

For me? The book has not been written enough to put Dorsey on that top 10 pedestal. You can thank the points per game for the dude we got named Josh Allen. There was nothing creative about what we ran last year. 

 

I feel like I am reading a short 150 page novel and I am only 25 pages in. too soon. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, gjv said:

I would say if your team is second in scoring and second in total yards/game in the NFL, it would be a gross omission for an OC not to be in the top 10 of all OC's no matter the circumstances.

Sure, but that way the list is not top 10 coordinators.  It's coordinators of top 10 offenses.  

Posted
14 hours ago, MasterStrategist said:

Cool, so all the same complaints we had with Daboll (fans have selective memory about).

 

Dorsey had less talent at Wr and OL, also a less than 100% QB for a good part of the 2nd half of season.

 

Obviously Josh is awesome, but that doesn't discount that Dorsey did more in Year 1 (with less talent), than Dabs did previously and fans are now enamored with.

 

Josh was a turnover machine in the redzone, led the NFL.  That's partially playcalling, but mostly Josh decision making and lack of execution.  

 

Also tough to have a consistent run game with our OL the past few years.

Yes very similar complaints which makes sense since Dorsey is just calling plays in a Daboll designed offense.

The poster asked what Dorsey needed to improve on. 

I listed several things. Do you disagree?

 

I was very encouraged last season when they signed Howard and it looked like they were going to retool the offense. Then that didn't happen.  If Dorsey and McD can't figure out how to use Knox and Kincaid on the field together then they will struggle.

Honestly with all the new pieces I would not be surprised if they struggle early. Hopefully they get better during the season. They regressed during the season last year. Of course some of that was Allen injury and the oline getting worse throughout the year.

On paper this should be a top 3 offense and be able to score via run, short pass, and big play. 

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

Yes very similar complaints which makes sense since Dorsey is just calling plays in a Daboll designed offense.

The poster asked what Dorsey needed to improve on. 

I listed several things. Do you disagree?

 

I was very encouraged last season when they signed Howard and it looked like they were going to retool the offense. Then that didn't happen.  If Dorsey and McD can't figure out how to use Knox and Kincaid on the field together then they will struggle.

Honestly with all the new pieces I would not be surprised if they struggle early. Hopefully they get better during the season. They regressed during the season last year. Of course some of that was Allen injury and the oline getting worse throughout the year.

On paper this should be a top 3 offense and be able to score via run, short pass, and big play. 

 

Yes, I disagree with pinning your list on Dorsey.

 

Here was your list:

1. Develop more consistent rushing attack

2. Not rely on Allen to bail him out

3. Decrease Allen's turnovers

4. Convert more 3rd and shorts

5. Play better in redzone

 

Our lack of talent and inconsistent OL play doomed #1, and contributed to #5.  Saffold, was extremely inconsistent and not very good when he was on.  Bates is better suited as a backup, albeit he's a average guard/could start for teams with a better RT.  Spencer Brown started the year horribly (back injury recovery), finished better but often needed "help" in pass pro.

 

Allen's injury didn't help, but Josh also made some poor decisions (especially in redzone), leading the league in turnovers inside the 20.  

 

#4 (3rd and short), here are some stats contradicting your statement:

1. 59% conversion rate in 2021 vs 69% in 2022 (3rd and less than 3).  Chiefs, for comparison, 52% in 2022

 

For #5 (redzone):

1. Mentioned Josh poor decision making above

2. Stats: we went from #1 in 2021 to #9 in thr NFL for 2022.  Partly Josh, partly inconsistent OL, and partly lack of consistent alot WR (McKenzie was horrible and a trick player at best in redzone).

3. Dorsey could get more creative, as Dabs had that going for him.  But I think other issues, stated above, contributed more

 

Bottom line, I'm a strong believer that our OL and poor slot play led to most of our offense inconsistent games.  If we're mentioning Dorsey improving, I think Josh can be used in the same sentence (decision making).  I think all of the above will be better in 2023.

 

As for Howard LY, he was a name-only/shell of former self.  His Achilles injury derailed his career.  

 

Regarding use of Kincaid/Knox together, that will be easy.. I expect Dalton will be moved around and less in-line (ie: primarily slot).  Bigger question is when Knox comes off the field, do they move Dalton in-line (Knoxs role) OR does Quentin  come on the field?  I expect the latter, and they don't put too much on Daltons plate immediately

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

Sure, but that way the list is not top 10 coordinators.  It's coordinators of top 10 offenses.  

I think you are splitting hairs. What criteria would you use to rate the OC's in 2022?

Posted

I give Dorsey an incomplete for his 2022 performance. The bad offensive line, injured QB, underperforming WR2 and it being Dorsey's first year calling the plays all added up to a very up and down season. Granted the offense still was a top unit by many measurements. However, I think by the end of 2023 we will really see how good or bad Dorsey is. Dorsey has more weapons and tools to work with in 2023 and a full year under his belt. Hopefully with better guard play and some new weapons things pan out bettter.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 7/13/2023 at 5:46 PM, DJB said:


 

 

Just a little note that this is apparently his ranking of THIS YEAR'S offensive coordinators who have not yet coordinated an NFL game with their new team (and in some cases, never yet have).

1 hour ago, billsfan89 said:

I give Dorsey an incomplete for his 2022 performance.

 

Fair, but again, to be clear - Sam Monson is projecting 2023 performance.

Posted (edited)

How is Brian Callahan, the Cinci OC not on this list? 

 

Been to a Superbowl & another AFC Championship game. Kicked our arse along the way. & Most reasonable people would agree the Cinci offense is rop 10 in the league.

 

Edited by Donuts and Doritos
Posted
10 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

Sure, but that way the list is not top 10 coordinators.  It's coordinators of top 10 offenses.  

 

Um no it's not. 

 

2022 top 10 offenses:

Chiefs

Eagles

Cowboys

Bills

Lions

49ers

Vikes

Bengals

Seahawks

Jags

 

Monson's list by team:

Lions

Chargers

Patriots

Seahawks

Bills

Commanders

Ravens

Chiefs

Colts

Cowboys

 

It's basically Monson's list of what OCs he likes.

Posted

Are these regular season rankings? or do they include the playoffs? If they are all inclusive and  If you are going to credit Bienemy as the chiefs OC, then he is #1 by far. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Um no it's not. 

 

2022 top 10 offenses:

Chiefs

Eagles

Cowboys

Bills

Lions

49ers

Vikes

Bengals

Seahawks

Jags

 

Monson's list by team:

Lions

Chargers

Patriots

Seahawks

Bills

Commanders

Ravens

Chiefs

Colts

Cowboys

 

It's basically Monson's list of what OCs he likes.

You missed my point.  I was responding to someone who said that if the Bills have a top offense, then Dorsey must be a top coordinator.   I said if that's how you measure top coordinator, then that's a list of the coordinators of the to9p offenses.  I didn't say that this guy, whoever he is, made his list that way.  

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...