billsfanone Posted June 1, 2005 Posted June 1, 2005 Typical liberal. http://www.forsakethetroops.net/
Alaska Darin Posted June 1, 2005 Posted June 1, 2005 I'd ignore him - because attention is what he craves.
Chilly Posted June 1, 2005 Posted June 1, 2005 I'd pass a law making him wear an IT from South Park 24/7.
EC-Bills Posted June 1, 2005 Posted June 1, 2005 Unf*ck*nbelievable. This guy is on crack! Going over this site, my first thought is this site can't be serious. Then I found the link that says it is serious. Apparently this numbnut has had some issues with his personal site and thus has made it private. What a jackhole!!!
brihs2005 Posted June 1, 2005 Posted June 1, 2005 Typical Liberal is a bit harsh... i think the military would have waged war on the 50% of the country that are liberal out there if they were all like that. That being said, i think the guy is a jerk that wants attention... i doubt that he has any followers... just wants the attention that AD says he craves.
IBTG81 Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 Well, RCow has been missing for quite awhile. I think we found him...
philburger1 Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 Typical liberal. http://www.forsakethetroops.net/ 348584[/snapback] That Jerk was on Hannity and Combs (spelling?) on Fox News. The first time I ever saw them both tear into a guest. Shaun looked so mad, i thought he would slug him if he could. That guy who does the site is about a 140 pounds soaking wet. Since he was a national TV,everbody knows what he looks like. I hope somebody gives him what he was coming. He looked like one of those skiiny little punks you see working at a record store who's response to everything is a wise crack.
Reuben Gant Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 Typical liberal. http://www.forsakethetroops.net/ 348584[/snapback] why on earth would you believe that there is anything typical, or typically liberal about that?
don_of_manhattan Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 Typical liberal. http://www.forsakethetroops.net/ 348584[/snapback]
don_of_manhattan Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 Typical liberal. http://www.forsakethetroops.net/ 348584[/snapback] Typical Liberal - you are kidding - right - what does this have to do with being a Liberal - you need to wake up - how many of the chicken-hawks running this country now did everything they did (albeit legal) to avoid military service during their younger years and continue to do things not in the favor of the troops - like sending them to iraq without the proper armor - troops trying to equip their humvees with scrap metal for protection is an atrocity in a war that was elective, where we chose the time to attack. LIBERALS have been at the helm of more American military victories than any other group if we must look at it that way. Conservatives don't love this country ANY more than Liberals - in fact, if you are concerned
Alaska Darin Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 Typical Liberal - you are kidding - right - what does this have to do with being a Liberal - you need to wake up - how many of the chicken-hawks running this country now did everything they did (albeit legal) to avoid military service during their younger years and continue to do things not in the favor of the troops - like sending them to iraq without the proper armor - troops trying to equip their humvees with scrap metal for protection is an atrocity in a war that was elective, where we chose the time to attack. LIBERALS have been at the helm of more American military victories than any other group if we must look at it that way. Conservatives don't love this country ANY more than Liberals - in fact, if you are concerned 350472[/snapback] Ladies and gentleman, please stop watching the evening news.
Tux of Borg Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 continue to do things not in the favor of the troops - like sending them to iraq without the proper armor - 350472[/snapback] All my friends in the 82nd airborne and 75th ranger regiment had body armor. The news media loves to interview troops in support units. They break down and cry because they don't have the latest and greatest grunt gear. Don't believe everything you hear on the news...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 like sending them to iraq without the proper armor So what, exactly, is proper armor? - troops trying to equip their humvees with scrap metal for protection is an atrocity350472[/snapback] Yeah...they should have used sandbags, like they traditionally have.
don_of_manhattan Posted June 5, 2005 Posted June 5, 2005 So what, exactly, is proper armor?Yeah...they should have used sandbags, like they traditionally have. 350779[/snapback] I assume from your trite remarks that you don't have loved ones or kids over there - that is part of the problem with this war and Vietnam - part of the population fights and dies in it, the other part gets to pontificate over it.....all who believe in this war should strap on some gear and get their asses to iraq with a quickness.
don_of_manhattan Posted June 5, 2005 Posted June 5, 2005 All my friends in the 82nd airborne and 75th ranger regiment had body armor. The news media loves to interview troops in support units. They break down and cry because they don't have the latest and greatest grunt gear. Don't believe everything you hear on the news... 350659[/snapback] I don't remember hearing or reading that any troops were totally without armor - what I have been made to understand is that they don't ALL have the best that money can buy - aren't support troops very often put in harm's way? Haven't some of them dealth with safety issues by using scrap metal to help equip their vehicles?
Ghost of BiB Posted June 5, 2005 Posted June 5, 2005 Don't tell me you are going to feed into this, please... This is stupid enough to be obviously an alter-ego from one of us. If not, probably about 13 years old. Maybe. Or, maybe Debbie cranked up again. Hard to tell. I'll settle for idiot.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 5, 2005 Posted June 5, 2005 I assume from your trite remarks that you don't have loved ones or kids over there - that is part of the problem with this war and Vietnam - part of the population fights and dies in it, the other part gets to pontificate over it.....all who believe in this war should strap on some gear and get their asses to iraq with a quickness. 351329[/snapback] I assume from your trite remarks that you don't have the first clue about anything even remotely concerned with fighting a war...
Tux of Borg Posted June 5, 2005 Posted June 5, 2005 I don't remember hearing or reading that any troops were totally without armor - what I have been made to understand is that they don't ALL have the best that money can buy - aren't support troops very often put in harm's way? Haven't some of them dealth with safety issues by using scrap metal to help equip their vehicles? 351331[/snapback] Support/maintenance units are considered to be in the combat theater. However they are usually a good distance from the fighting. Do the Jessica Lynch's of the military need to have an m4 rifle, pac-4 laser, and 7 bravo night vision? Absolutely not. My company had one hummer assigned to it. It was so old, it had bullet holes from Panama in it. But it made it through Panama, Haiti, Kosovo, and Afghanistan without having any armor on it.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 I assume from your trite remarks that you don't have loved ones or kids over there - that is part of the problem with this war and Vietnam - part of the population fights and dies in it, the other part gets to pontificate over it.....all who believe in this war should strap on some gear and get their asses to iraq with a quickness. 351329[/snapback] Correction: all who DON'T believe in this war should get all geared up and over there.
Recommended Posts