ChiGoose Posted July 14, 2023 Posted July 14, 2023 Not much of a surprise here, even from the ultra conservative fifth circuit:
BillsFanNC Posted July 14, 2023 Author Posted July 14, 2023 I wonder how the King is bloviating now? Wait, no I dont. 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 15, 2023 Author Posted July 15, 2023 Useful idiots will continue getting owned and continue being useful idiots and then getting owned. The cycle is perpetual. They do not care. Therefore ignore and tag, tag and ignore is the only way. Let's tag and ignore the King @ChiGoose here. 1
ChiGoose Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 46 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Useful idiots will continue getting owned and continue being useful idiots and then getting owned. The cycle is perpetual. They do not care. Therefore ignore and tag, tag and ignore is the only way. Let's tag and ignore the King @ChiGoose here. I appreciate you continuing in the spirit of Pride Month even after it’s over by thinking of me constantly. 🥰🥰🥰🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈 You are a true LGBTQ ally! Slay queen!
ChiGoose Posted July 15, 2023 Posted July 15, 2023 12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: ^^^^^ Works every time. I love that you see bragging about how utterly pathetic your life is as a good thing. Go outside and touch some grass. Sad!
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 27, 2023 Posted September 27, 2023 55 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: The government's attempts to censor and control the free exchange of ideas and opinions picked up after world war 2 with the establishment of a multitude of intelligence agencies responding to the threat of the cold war with the Soviets. Most of that messaging was centered around the battle between capitalism and communism, open societies vs. dictatorships. Once that battle was won those agencies appeared to be out of a job. But the IC was not going to self-destruct so other enemies were identified. International terrorists, Muslim extremists. And currently the threat of the moment, domestic "extremists". One big problem now is the technology, such as social media, for peer to peer exchange makes it more difficult than it used to be when there were just a handful of media outlets. In the old days all that was needed was strong-arming a few dozen editors-in-chief to pressure or order their reporters to kill a story. Now there are 100's of millions of people capable of communicating their message with others able to reinforce of amplify that message. In short, its no long possible to go door-to-door attempting to influence and threaten people to shut up so while the game is the same the tools and technologies have become more sophisticated. So the governments methods of controlling public perception and information became more complex. And included engagement of resources outside the government. And unfortunately for the government, harder to hide and control. Regardless of the tools and the times, the basic operation works more or less this way. Step 1. Create some false "truth" through disinformation/misinformation. Step 2. "Experts" proclaim the false truth is the real truth. Step 3. Have other experts, media, and politicians repeat the narrative over and over. The media vigorously reports the story, carpet bombing the public. Step 4. False narrative becomes the baseline for the truth and in the current environment with social media "fact checking". Step 5. Fact checkers censor or identify or mark anything that differs from the manufactured narrative as disinformation/misinformation. Step 6. Establish consequences for spreaders of disinformation/misinformation. Step 7. Ensure the public is sufficiently conditioned to reject the truth and accept the narrative as fact. Step 8. If and when the real story cannot be suppressed it doesn't matter because so many people are psychologically conditioned to believe the lie that they cannot accept the truth. We're more or less at step 8 with a multitude of social and political issues. 1
B-Man Posted March 18 Posted March 18 SCOTUS Set to Hear Free Speech Case on Biden Admin Colluding With Big Tech to Stifle 'Misinformation' Are you ready? Something big is set to start on Monday. As we wrote in Oct. 2023, the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, along with five plaintiffs, asked the United States Supreme Court to uphold an injunction prohibiting the Biden administration from colluding with Big Tech companies to stifle free speech on social media sites by calling it "misinformation." They also argued that the case should be heard in front of the High Court. https://redstate.com/beccalower/2024/03/17/scotus-set-to-hear-free-speech-case-on-biden-admin-colluding-with-big-tech-to-stifle-misinformation-n2171525 2
daz28 Posted March 18 Posted March 18 Imagine being so dumb, that you think the government shouldn't be able to keep national security issues, such as nuke codes, off of social media. LOL Luckily even the conservatives on the court realize this. I'm actually surprised that a few dummies brought this issue to court, rather then let it play out for the dummies through Fox news instead.
Recommended Posts