Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why can't he be more like the patriot Hillary Clinton? 

 

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/veterans/

 

Veterans, the Armed Forces, and their families

Note: This page is a reproduction of the Hillary for America policy proposal on veterans, the Armed Forces, and their families. 

Hillary Clinton’s father, Hugh Rodham, was a chief petty officer at Naval Station Great Lakes during World War II. He instilled in Hillary at an early age the importance of supporting our men and women in uniform, as well as military families and veterans—and an empathy for the challenges that many servicemembers and veterans face.

Hillary believes that by supporting our veterans, we strengthen our military, our economy, and our country. She knows that we cannot separate supporting our veterans from our broader commitment to take care of our troops—soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen—and their families.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

I have no idea what this story is about, but if leftists, marxists and useful idiots are against it....

 

Then kudos senator Tuberville!

Yeah- I’m not really sure what hold up is about…it may be justified, it may not…But because a reason is not given, it’s kinda hard to have an opinion one way or the other…

Posted
5 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Yeah- I’m not really sure what hold up is about…it may be justified, it may not…But because a reason is not given, it’s kinda hard to have an opinion one way or the other…

Sure, he's holding up people's careers in the military and that might be ok with you. MAGA first! 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

I have no idea what this story is about, but if leftists, marxists and useful idiots are against it....

 

Then kudos senator Tuberville!

 

Just now, JaCrispy said:

Yeah- I’m not really sure what hold up is about…it may be justified, it may not…But because a reason is not given, it’s kinda hard to have an opinion one way or the other…

 

 

There is a reason that they are only giving you half the story.

 

I was going to ignore Tibsy's latest thread, but since you asked.

 

Quote

 Tuberville opposes the Pentagon's abortion policy, which allows for time off and travel expenses for abortion – for troops and their dependents in states where it's not available.

 

This is a NEW Biden administration practice, using taxpayer's money for abortion, which is illegal.

 

The policy was enacted following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade last year, eliminating the constitutional right to abortion. (FALSE)

 

 

Tuberville calls the policy illegal, saying he’ll release his hold on the nominations when it’s rescinded.

 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/05/23/abortion-tuberville-military-pentagon-onpolitics/70248591007/

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Yeah- I’m not really sure what hold up is about…it may be justified, it may not…But because a reason is not given, it’s kinda hard to have an opinion one way or the other…

Promotions under Biden are diversity driven to ensure the most unqualified commanders are promoted to the highest levels to meet the administration's quota objectives while putting the enlisted military men and women in danger that comes from substandard leadership.

 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
42 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Promotions under Biden are diversity driven to ensure the most unqualified commanders are promoted to the highest levels to meet the administration's quota objectives while putting the enlisted military men and women in danger that comes from substandard leadership.

 

Proof? 

 

Our military is the finest in the world and attempts like this to use "woke" garbage and race baiting to discredit our military is both disgusting and disingenuous. Tuberville is holding up these fine young men and women, who our defending our nation, for personal reasons. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Proof? 

 

Our military is the finest in the world and attempts like this to use "woke" garbage and race baiting to discredit our military is both disgusting and disingenuous. Tuberville is holding up these fine young men and women, who our defending our nation, for personal reasons. 

 

 

Proof is simple observation.  With few exceptions thie top jobs in this administration are filled by incompetent and unqualified people.  The military is no exception.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Proof? 

 

Our military is the finest in the world and attempts like this to use "woke" garbage and race baiting to discredit our military is both disgusting and disingenuous. Tuberville is holding up these fine young men and women, who our defending our nation, for personal reasons. 

 

 

 

I don't see any discredit of our military, and putting unqualified people in positions to get a quota has resulted in deaths.

It has been going on for years, and is not a positive.

Biden has his chance now, as the Secretary of Defense has nominated Admiral Paparo to Chief of Naval Operations, while the Beltway favorite is a female Admiral Franchetti.

Paparo would be a signal of China concern, as that is his wheelhouse.

 

By the way, his "personal reasons," as you term it is an issue with using military assets to transport military personnel for abortion procedures.

Further these appointments are senior positions, not "fine young men and women."

They are career officers at flag rank, and it will get done with no negative consequences.

Posted
10 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

I don't see any discredit of our military, and putting unqualified people in positions to get a quota has resulted in deaths.

 

Who is unqualified? 

 

This is just partisan hackery at its worse. Hurting military careers by using ugly partisan rhetoric to support the deliberate hurting of military personal's careers. 

 

Anyone claiming that what Tuberville is doing a good and honest thing is only showing where their true loyalty lies, not to our military, but to the GOP. America second 

27 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Proof is simple observation.  With few exceptions thie top jobs in this administration are filled by incompetent and unqualified people.  The military is no exception.  

 

 

You calling Lloyd Austin unqualified? Someone on this board declared he had "no resume." Puh! 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Who is unqualified? 

 

This is just partisan hackery at its worse. Hurting military careers by using ugly partisan rhetoric to support the deliberate hurting of military personal's careers. 

 

 

 

Absolute nonsense.

Nobody's career is being damaged.

And, again, the placing of people in positions they were unqualified for in order to get a quota has resulted in death.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Why can't he be more like the patriot Hillary Clinton? 

 

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/veterans/

 

Veterans, the Armed Forces, and their families

Note: This page is a reproduction of the Hillary for America policy proposal on veterans, the Armed Forces, and their families. 

Hillary Clinton’s father, Hugh Rodham, was a chief petty officer at Naval Station Great Lakes during World War II. He instilled in Hillary at an early age the importance of supporting our men and women in uniform, as well as military families and veterans—and an empathy for the challenges that many servicemembers and veterans face.

Hillary believes that by supporting our veterans, we strengthen our military, our economy, and our country. She knows that we cannot separate supporting our veterans from our broader commitment to take care of our troops—soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen—and their families.

 

Yah now there's a POS that has nothing but her own personal gains in mind, to call her a patriot is like calling Stormy Daniels a nun ...

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Sure, he's holding up people's careers in the military and that might be ok with you. MAGA first! 

 

Nothing at all like the careers ruined by the Dems during the prior administration though .

Posted
55 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Who is unqualified? 

 

This is just partisan hackery at its worse. Hurting military careers by using ugly partisan rhetoric to support the deliberate hurting of military personal's careers. 

 

Anyone claiming that what Tuberville is doing a good and honest thing is only showing where their true loyalty lies, not to our military, but to the GOP. America second 

You calling Lloyd Austin unqualified? Someone on this board declared he had "no resume." Puh! 

This administration should know partisan hackery and obstruction when they see it.  Other than playing victim, that's pretty much all they're good at.  It's all Democrats did 2017 to 2020.  Payback is what? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Why can't he be more like the patriot Hillary Clinton? 

 

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/veterans/

 

Veterans, the Armed Forces, and their families

Note: This page is a reproduction of the Hillary for America policy proposal on veterans, the Armed Forces, and their families. 

Hillary Clinton’s father, Hugh Rodham, was a chief petty officer at Naval Station Great Lakes during World War II. He instilled in Hillary at an early age the importance of supporting our men and women in uniform, as well as military families and veterans—and an empathy for the challenges that many servicemembers and veterans face.

Hillary believes that by supporting our veterans, we strengthen our military, our economy, and our country. She knows that we cannot separate supporting our veterans from our broader commitment to take care of our troops—soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen—and their families.

 

You have to be living in a separate universe.

Hillary was grossly disrespective of the military and even her Secret Service protectors.

They despised her.

She didn't want military to wear their uniforms in the White House, never conversed with them and generally treated them with disdain.

The Secret Service regarded assignment to her as punishment.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
55 minutes ago, T master said:

 

Yah now there's a POS that has nothing but her own personal gains in mind, to call her a patriot is like calling Stormy Daniels a nun ...

Or Hunter Biden Dad of the Year.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

I don't see any discredit of our military, and putting unqualified people in positions to get a quota has resulted in deaths.

It has been going on for years, and is not a positive.

Biden has his chance now, as the Secretary of Defense has nominated Admiral Paparo to Chief of Naval Operations, while the Beltway favorite is a female Admiral Franchetti.

Paparo would be a signal of China concern, as that is his wheelhouse.

 

By the way, his "personal reasons," as you term it is an issue with using military assets to transport military personnel for abortion procedures.

Further these appointments are senior positions, not "fine young men and women."

They are career officers at flag rank, and it will get done with no negative consequences.

I always appreciate your perspective, but rumor is Tibsy is 109 years old.  They could well be fine young men and women from his perspective. 

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Who is unqualified? 

 

This is just partisan hackery at its worse. Hurting military careers by using ugly partisan rhetoric to support the deliberate hurting of military personal's careers. 

 

 

 Update:  He has to be at least as old as Joe Biden based on this sentence alone. 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Haha (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...