Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
52 minutes ago, Westside said:

That’s not proof. You have accusations not evidence.

 

Trumpers claim Biden and the entire Democtat Party are pedophiles.

 

Where's the proof?

Posted
1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

Trumpers claim Biden and the entire Democtat Party are pedophiles.

 

Where's the proof?

Deflect, deflect, deflect.........

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

Trumpers claim Biden and the entire Democtat Party are pedophiles.

 

Where's the proof?

Please tell us what you’d like to be called? All the good ones like…..Deplorables, Nazis, Putin lovers were already taken! 

Posted
10 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Please tell us what you’d like to be called? All the good ones like…..Deplorables, Nazis, Putin lovers were already taken! 

 

Many of your cmpatriots here have claimed that Biden and Democrats are pedophiles. I don't know if you have. 

You know the thread you're in, right?

Posted
1 minute ago, Kemp said:

 

Many of your cmpatriots here have claimed that Biden and Democrats are pedophiles. I don't know if you have. 

You know the thread you're in, right?

I’m not sure about that. Groomer is not analogous with pedophile. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’m not sure about that. Groomer is not analogous with pedophile. 

 

Surprised you're unaware of the connection.

Maybe you should look it up.

Posted

This thread of another great example of useful idiocy in action.

 

Why is there any controversy whatsoever about how completely inappropriate it is to be talking to CHILDREN, not only about inappropriate sexual content, but how it's an easy, flippant decision to change their sex?

 

Instead there's deflection, denials that it's even happening at all etc. all from people on the left because they've been told to at best look the other way and at worst support it. 

 

Meanwhile, five years ago if a teacher spoke to or showed a six year old sexual content everyone would agree that individual at minimum needs to be fired immediately if not put away for awhile.

 

Not anymore.

 

Because useful idiots.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

This thread of another great example of useful idiocy in action.

 

Why is there any controversy whatsoever about how completely inappropriate it is to be talking to CHILDREN, not only about inappropriate sexual content, but how it's an easy, flippant decision to change their sex?

 

Instead there's deflection, denials that it's even happening at all etc. all from people on the left because they've been told to at best look the other way and at worst support it. 

 

Meanwhile, five years ago if a teacher spoke to or showed a six year old sexual content everyone would agree that individual at minimum needs to be fired immediately if not put away for awhile.

 

Not anymore.

 

Because useful idiots.

 

 

And keep in mind that teachers have zero expertise in human sexuality. They should NOT be talking to children about any of this. As close as they should get is to contact the parent and recommend the child see a trained expert. And NOT the guidance counselor either. They also have ZERO training in this subject matter. 

Posted

 

 

This trans activist who explains how children are like donuts and suggests we wait for them to declare their own gender so they can have their own gender-reveal party.

 

I'd like to solve the puzzle.

 

F3Mi2e3WAAIabx3?format=webp&name=small

 

 

 

 

 

Kids: I wanna learn some math

 

This dude:

 

F3MWl7qXkAA6Sk2?format=webp&name=small

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

There is a reckoning coming.

 

 

This is why I laugh everytime a MAGA tells me I'm using the D playbook.  You MQAGA's just parrot every approved phrase (groomer) and talking points on every issue that your handlers think are winners for them.  good thing they aren't.  but parrot on....

 

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
×
×
  • Create New...