Cancel all groomers

[Unforgiven]

https://summit.news/2023/06/28/28685/

 

250 Hollywood Celebrities Sign Letter Demanding Big Tech Censor Anyone Who Opposes Trans Surgeries On Kids

 

Some 250 woke Hollywood celebrities from movies, TV and music have signed their names to an open letter urging big tech companies to crack down on anyone who doesn’t fall into line with the trans agenda, including advocating life changing gender surgeries on children.

The letter was sent to the CEOs of Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Twitter by GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) and the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), and was signed by hundreds of famous names including Amy Schumer, Ariana Grande, Demi Lovato, Jamie Lee Curtis, Judd Apatow, Patrick Stewart and many more.

 

Movies and tv shows suck, hollywood is the gutter...who is listening to any of these jackasses?

 

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/nbc-out-proud/re-coming-children-chant-nyc-drag-march-elicits-outrage-activists-say-rcna91341

 

‘We’re Coming For Your Children’ chant at NYC Drag March elicits outrage, but activists say it’s taken out of context

 

Believe them, they are screaming the truth on this one. Animals the whole lot of them.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/new-york-governor-signs-safe-haven-law-transgender-youth-rcna91156

New York governor signs 'safe haven' law for transgender youth

New York is now among a dozen states that have laws protecting access to transition-related medical care for minors.

 

 

 

These people are truly monsters.

Edited June 28, 2023 by Unforgiven

[boater]

Man.. if someone did trans-surgery on my child they'd get a sock in the face.

 

No one, but no one, should be making gender decisions before the age of 18. (actually, I endorse age 25 when the prefrontal cortex is fully developed).

[Big Blitz]

Communists.  All of em.  

[Unforgiven]

STOP THE MONSTERS.

 

[B-Man]

 

 

I had to turn it off about 2/3rds of the way through.

 

Disgusting.

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

California Senate passes bill allowing 12-year-olds to consent to gender-affirming care

 

 

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2023/06/28/california-senate-passes-bill-allowing-12-year-olds-to-consent-to-gender-affirming-care-n2384918

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

California Senate passes bill allowing 12-year-olds to consent to gender-affirming care

 

 

https://twitchy.com/brettt/2023/06/28/california-senate-passes-bill-allowing-12-year-olds-to-consent-to-gender-affirming-care-n2384918

 

here is the actual law - No spin…  defend this you sick *****. You people are really mentally unhinged 

 

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB665

Stay away from our kids you sick perverts 

[ChiGoose]

11 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

here is the actual law - No spin…  defend this you sick *****. You people are really mentally unhinged 

 

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB665

Stay away from our kids you sick perverts 

Can you cite the specific section or subsection you disagree with?

BTW: I appreciate you posting a link to the actual text. Too often, it’s just conjecture without grounding in the legislative text. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Can you cite the specific section or subsection you disagree with?

BTW: I appreciate you posting a link to the actual text. Too often, it’s just conjecture without grounding in the legislative text. 

 

my kids are right at this age, they have no business making independent life altering decisions pushed by pharma shops. 
 

this is absolutely twisted and perverse. If you have children you know how ***** up this is. 
 

I rarely get mad about stuff but this is deplorable.  
 

defend this … go ahead. Why ? 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

Haven't you already tried to cancel everyone who isn't afraid of LBGTQ people without success?

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-california-bill-mental-health-youth-custody-628928834873#

 

Perhaps you still disagree but this is a different kettle of fish.

 

However, the bill does not authorize the state to remove minors from the custody of their parents, said Assemblywoman Wendy Carrillo, the bill’s Democratic sponsor, in an email. “This bill makes no changes to the processes of the child welfare system in California and no changes to the processes of removal,” she explained. 

Legal experts agreed, telling The Associated Press that while it’s true the bill allows minors to seek mental health services to discuss gender identity without parental consent, minors would still need such consent for any medical procedures.

Edited June 29, 2023 by redtail hawk

[ChiGoose]

9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

my kids are right at this age, they have no business making independent life altering decisions pushed by pharma shops. 
 

this is absolutely twisted and perverse. If you have children you know how ***** up this is. 
 

I rarely get mad about stuff but this is deplorable.  
 

defend this … go ahead. Why ? 

 

I have a child. I’m not defending anything. I’m just asking what particular part of the law’s text you disagree with.

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Haven't you already tried to cancel everyone who isn't afraid of LBGTQ people without success?

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-california-bill-mental-health-youth-custody-628928834873#

Read the bill not the AP softening.   You are so in the tank for your handlers 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Read the bill not the AP softening.   You are so in the tank for your handlers 

no one in gov't handles me.  You?

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

Just now, ChiGoose said:

I have a child. I’m not defending anything. I’m just asking what particular part of the law’s text you disagree with.

I read conditions are defined where 12 year olds may approve medical procedures without parental consent. I disapprove. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I read conditions are defined where 12 year olds may approve medical procedures without parental consent. I disapprove. 

Me too

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

no one in gov't handles me.  You?

My wife does consulting work for local school administrations… so I don’t have a perfect answer 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

My wife does consulting work for local school administrations… so I don’t have a perfect answer 

k, I scanned the doc. Looks like only change is for mental health and domiciliary housing should a child desire it.  Bunches of stipulations and prof evals required.  No non parental consent med procedures.  Legal folks, do u see different?

[ChiGoose]

11 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

I read conditions are defined where 12 year olds may approve medical procedures without parental consent. I disapprove. 

Section 1(k)?

Section 2(a)(1)?

Section 2(b)?

 

What language do you object to?

6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

k, I scanned the doc. Looks like only change is for mental health and domiciliary housing should a child desire it.  Bunches of stipulations and prof evals required.  No non parental consent med procedures.  Legal folks, do u see different?

This is why the actual text is important.
 

1st graders and 16 year olds are different but are both children. So bad actors take something that may only be appropriate for kids 16+ and then say it’s for all children in order to elicit an emotional response. 
 

Likewise with “gender affirming care.” It’s talked about like it means surgery when, for the most part, it’s therapy. (This also is frequent with the term “abortion” which may include miscarriages in the medical field but is assumed to be voluntary in the political world)

 

The game for the activists is to misrepresent the facts and then call out anyone trying to explain them as being a pedophile. But I have sympathy for people who don’t understand what’s going on and think that people who just want kids to feel safe in their own skin are actually advocating something evil based on the lies they hear. 

Edited June 29, 2023 by ChiGoose

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

28 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Section 1(k)?

Section 2(a)(1)?

Section 2(b)?

 

What language do you object to?

This is why the actual text is important.
 

1st graders and 16 year olds are different but are both children. So bad actors take something that may only be appropriate for kids 16+ and then say it’s for all children in order to elicit an emotional response. 
 

Likewise with “gender affirming care.” It’s talked about like it means surgery when, for the most part, it’s therapy. (This also is frequent with the term “abortion” which may include miscarriages in the medical field but is assumed to be voluntary in the political world)

 

The game for the activists is to misrepresent the facts and then call out anyone trying to explain them as being a pedophile. But I have sympathy for people who don’t understand what’s going on and think that people who just want kids to feel safe in their own skin are actually advocating something evil based on the lies they hear. 

the first paragraph authorizes a 12 yr old to independently consent to medical treatment. That’s indefensible. 
 

Have any of you dealt with a 12 year old.

 

they argue about taking a shower or brushing their teeth. 
 

and you ***** head garbage ***** morons want them to have medical procedure autonomy??

 

you are seriously the dumbest individuals on the planet.. it’s not close. 

Edited June 29, 2023 by Over 29 years of fanhood

[ChiGoose]

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

the first paragraph authorizes a 12 yr old to independently consent to medical treatment. That’s indefensible. 

So your opposition is to 12 year olds being able to get therapy without consent of their parents?