Big Blitz Posted March 5 Posted March 5 5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Here we go again. Frito-Lay this time? Call it out as disgusting and this woke virtue signaling fad goes away. Unless you enjoy explaining to 9 year olds what this means. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 5 Posted March 5 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: So since literally nobody in the USA knows who this is, I had to look it up. Some trans performer in Spain, retained to do some PR for Spanish Doritos, owned by Frito-Lay, in turn owned by Pepsi. Please continue to Streisand Effect this bizarre personality, and let me know the list of which products I cannot buy or consume. I assume it will go beyond Spanish Doritos? This one gonna hit Bills fans hard. (Why does Spain even have Doritos? Buy those wickedly good Jamon flavored potato chips instead!)
B-Man Posted March 5 Posted March 5 It's alright. Moms for Liberty taped the WHOLE interview and have provided what CBS selectively edited out. Only the lemmings are fooled '60 Minutes' Airs Hit Piece on Moms for Liberty and 'Books Bans' That Reeks of Bias By Jennifer Oliver O'Connell A 60 Minutes segment featuring Moms for Liberty co-founders Tiffany Justice and Tina Descovich aired on Sunday, to much controversy. Titled "97 Books," correspondent Scott Pelley outlined the “growing trend of right-wing book bans.” No bias there, whatsoever. Pelley grilled the co-founders of the organization about their campaign to remove books from school libraries that they deemed offensive, and why they insist on using the term "groomer" to describe people who insist children should have access to these books. The interview went as expected: Pelley produced the legacy media hit job with closed-ended questions and narrative massaging cuts and lead-ins. https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2024/03/04/cbs-60-minutes-brought-a-knife-to-a-gunfight-with-moms-for-liberty-and-regrets-doing-so-n2170911 I encourage you to read the entire article for the truth, I know that it is too long for PPP's poorer posters. . 1
Big Blitz Posted March 6 Posted March 6 On 3/4/2024 at 7:15 PM, The Frankish Reich said: Here we go again. Frito-Lay this time? Annnnnnnd gone……congrats for sticking up for this - immediately went to de facto “must not agree with anything conservatives say” mode. Pathetic. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: Annnnnnnd gone……congrats for sticking up for this - immediately went to de facto “must not agree with anything conservatives say” mode. Pathetic. Is it safe to eat Doritos again? And meanwhile, you continue to force us to look at that. Like those old Peter Pan images that used to show up all the time ...
The Frankish Reich Posted March 7 Posted March 7 On 3/6/2024 at 5:38 AM, Tommy Callahan said: We need more of this And moms for Liberty endorses him. In which we pause for a few seconds to consider this: Moms For Liberty endorses a candidate nostalgic for the days when women were not allowed to vote. And still they say they play on natural turf, not astroturf ... 1 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted March 7 Posted March 7 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: In which we pause for a few seconds to consider this: Moms For Liberty endorses a candidate nostalgic for the days when women were not allowed to vote. https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/03/06/mark-robinson-women-vote/ I know you are all about shooting straight and having context matter. Except when it comes to that whole harassment of Jews being ignored in favor of a white guys in Buffalo parable. Anyway, let the noted righty fact checkers at snopes educate you a smidge. That way you won’t have to repeat this over and over. 4
The Frankish Reich Posted March 7 Posted March 7 Just now, JDHillFan said: https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/03/06/mark-robinson-women-vote/ I know you are all about shooting straight and having context matter. Except when it comes to that whole harassment of Jews being ignored in favor of a white guys in Buffalo parable. Anyway, let the noted righty fact checkers at snopes educate you a smidge. That way you won’t have to repeat this over and over. I read the initial Red State "rebuttal." Yes, there was additional "context" but even that context leaves me wondering what the hell he was trying to say. A reporter asked, fairly, something like this: MAGA suggests, by its very name, that America was better/greater at some past time. When was that time? A little prodding and we get to the pre-19th Amendment suffrage days. And he says, "Yes!" I want to go back to those days (and then explains) because in those days Republicans fought for social change. What? You want to go back to a time when there was a horrible deprivation of freedom because that spurred a political party to take a stand against such horrible deprivation of freedom? If people are confused, it is because it is an incoherent thought. Do we want to go back to the days of slavery because, well, there would have been no Republican Party without an abolitionist movement? Stupid comment regardless of the point he thought he was making, and he's still got lots of explaining to do. 1 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted March 7 Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Stupid comment regardless Equally stupid to pretend what you did initially but I guess it was important to make it more scary as it was intended as a slap to those awful soccer moms speaking out. 5
Tommy Callahan Posted March 7 Posted March 7 (edited) It's kind of basic to a lot of folks. hard work equates to positive results. Bad actions equate to negative results. Where people drive the economy. Not state stimulus and spending bills Functioning economic policies Just to name a few. But you run with the discredited sex card the alt left tried to attack him with. Edited March 7 by Tommy Callahan 1 1
Recommended Posts