BillStime Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Kids can't read, write, perform basic math, or understand the English language and leave school without any basic life skills but idiots think class time should be devoted to things kids figured out without the help of teachers and schools since the beginning of time. hoax
dickleyjones Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Kids can't read, write, perform basic math, or understand the English language and leave school without any basic life skills but idiots think class time should be devoted to things kids figured out without the help of teachers and schools since the beginning of time. Kids have been learning about families in school for a long while. And before you misunderstand, yes, porn is not for kids. 1
B-Man Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Moms For Liberty BURIES 60 Minutes With Receipts After Program Runs Hit Piece on 'Banning' Books Let's start here with the bad news. The legacy media is every bit as manipulative and deceptive as you know they are. We already were aware of that, but Sunday night's 60 Minutes segment about 'banning books' in America put the problem in stark relief once again. But here's the good news. Conservatives are onto the game, and they know the corporate media cannot be trusted as far as you could kick them. So, when Moms For Liberty founders Tiffany Justice and Tina Descovich agreed to appear on 60 Minutes to talk about the problem of gender ideology in schools, they were prepared. {snip} And sure enough, Scott Pelley did not disappoint in his segment, which was skewed from the very start, claiming that books are being 'banned,' which, of course, they are not. Anywhere. All concerned parents want is to limit their children's access to pornographic material and sexual indoctrination WHILE IN SCHOOL. And for that, Moms For Liberty gets labeled as 'right-wing extremists.' Pelley here claims twice that Justice and Descovich evaded his questions. Except Pelley has a problem. Moms For Liberty can prove that they did not dodge them. Sounds like a pretty comprehensive answer to us, 60 Minutes. Why didn't that air? We can't comment on what liability 60 Minutes might face here, that is a question for people well-versed in libel and defamation law, but it sure seems like Moms For Liberty has a case, given what they actually said to 60 Minutes versus what 60 Minutes aired. The editing 60 Minutes did isn't even very good. You can actually SEE some of the jump cuts. Reprehensible. https://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2024/03/03/moms-for-liberty-60-minutes-banning-books-n2393553
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Posted March 4 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Moms For Liberty BURIES 60 Minutes With Receipts After Program Runs Hit Piece on 'Banning' Books Let's start here with the bad news. The legacy media is every bit as manipulative and deceptive as you know they are. We already were aware of that, but Sunday night's 60 Minutes segment about 'banning books' in America put the problem in stark relief once again. But here's the good news. Conservatives are onto the game, and they know the corporate media cannot be trusted as far as you could kick them. So, when Moms For Liberty founders Tiffany Justice and Tina Descovich agreed to appear on 60 Minutes to talk about the problem of gender ideology in schools, they were prepared. {snip} And sure enough, Scott Pelley did not disappoint in his segment, which was skewed from the very start, claiming that books are being 'banned,' which, of course, they are not. Anywhere. All concerned parents want is to limit their children's access to pornographic material and sexual indoctrination WHILE IN SCHOOL. And for that, Moms For Liberty gets labeled as 'right-wing extremists.' Pelley here claims twice that Justice and Descovich evaded his questions. Except Pelley has a problem. Moms For Liberty can prove that they did not dodge them. Sounds like a pretty comprehensive answer to us, 60 Minutes. Why didn't that air? We can't comment on what liability 60 Minutes might face here, that is a question for people well-versed in libel and defamation law, but it sure seems like Moms For Liberty has a case, given what they actually said to 60 Minutes versus what 60 Minutes aired. The editing 60 Minutes did isn't even very good. You can actually SEE some of the jump cuts. Reprehensible. https://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2024/03/03/moms-for-liberty-60-minutes-banning-books-n2393553 It would have been a lot more enjoyable to watch that Florida "Throuple" woman interviewed.
phypon Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 hours ago, BillStime said: I also think that ignoring pop culture and Taylor Swift should be a crime. Why aren't schools and teachers getting more involved in top chart musical artists, movies, cosmetics, and hand bag accessories? These children need to be taught how to safely stop traffic on a busy highway and how to peacefully burn down businesses when protesting. Criminals are victims too! 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, phypon said: I also think that ignoring pop culture and Taylor Swift should be a crime. Why aren't schools and teachers getting more involved in top chart musical artists, movies, cosmetics, and hand bag accessories? These children need to be taught how to safely stop traffic on a busy highway and how to peacefully burn down businesses when protesting. Criminals are victims too! Right, and let's start with this!
B-Man Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Ignoring the weak-ass attempts to attack the organization, back to what they are standing for.
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Ignoring the weak-ass attempts to attack the organization Good luck with that one. https://torontosun.com/news/world/schools-out-board-boots-threeway-sex-loving-moms-for-liberty-co-founder "Moms for Liberty" will never live this down. Prediction: they'll change their name.
B-Man Posted March 4 Posted March 4 No, most of Americans care about their message, they are not 'fascinated' with a threeway. . . . . . . . as you apparently are. Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Good luck with that one. https://torontosun.com/news/world/schools-out-board-boots-threeway-sex-loving-moms-for-liberty-co-founder "Moms for Liberty" will never live this down. Prediction: they'll change their name. MEANWHILE I’ll play: @Moms4Liberty are moms who don’t want children sexualized. And they don’t like barren and bitter lesbians OR young Marxists pushing false history, racism, socialism, and radical gender ideology on those in their charge. American schools are matriculating illiterate activists and failing to produce competent and informed citizens. Teachers are part of the problem, and demonizing MOMS who give a ***** is not the solution. God-forbid a parent demand results instead of a ridiculous record of failure. 2020/COVID exposed many mothers to the REASON for the abject failure our school system is. Demolish the @usedgov . #SchoolVouchers #homeschool 1
The Frankish Reich Posted March 4 Posted March 4 (edited) Moms For Liberty is the classic astro-turf group, created by a bunch of Republican activists masquerading as regular old "concerned moms." That is why Bridget Ziegler's role and personal life is - and will always be - relevant. It exposed the organization for what it really is. Phony. A lot of you fell for it hook, line, and sinker. The cure for being embarrassed doesn't start with biting again. Edited March 4 by The Frankish Reich
phypon Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 hours ago, BillStime said: Found a great article for you. Who needs math! https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/oklahoma-school-under-investigation-after-shock-video-shows/ I bet you support that type of thing in schools. Talk about sick! 1
B-Man Posted March 4 Posted March 4 16 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Moms For Liberty is the classic astro-turf group, created by a bunch of Republican activists masquerading as regular old "concerned moms." That is why Bridget Ziegler's role and personal life is - and will always be - relevant. It exposed the organization for what it really is. Phony. A lot of you fell for it hook, line, and sinker. The cure for being embarrassed doesn't start with biting again. LOL, another 'proclamation' from the mountaintop. Moms for Liberty (300 chapters/48 states/130k members) is proven wrong because one or two of it's members were in a sexual scandal. LOL I hope that you apply this "phony" standard to everyone. Sadly, you cannot understand that there is nothing to be embarrassed about, just admiration for women who are standing up for their rights as parents..
B-Man Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 hours ago, BillStime said: Wow. What better proof that those opposing Moms for Liberty have nothing. Thanks B.S. Meanwhile: 1
BillStime Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 15 minutes ago, B-Man said: What better proof that those opposing Moms for Liberty have nothing. Thanks B.S. If Moms for Liberty were winning the PR battle - Bonnie wouldn't be so obsessed about defending them every single minute. lmao
B-Man Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Quick reminder for the board of what Moms for Liberty is truly addressing. But keep throwing those 🦫, 🦫, 🦫's out there. . 1
Recommended Posts