Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


“Why are people upset that I’m the chair of a group that invites violence and hatred against teachers?!??”

I’ve been waiting for someone dumber than John from Riverside to show up. To your credit you can at least construct a sentence. Otherwise…

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Nope.

 

He made it up.

 

 

 

 

Melissa Boche of the Los Angeles chapter threatened to gun down librarians. 
 

https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/06/17/a-moms-for-liberty-leader-threatens-gun-violence-against-librarians-audio/

15 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

I’ve been waiting for someone dumber than John from Riverside to show up. To your credit you can at least construct a sentence. Otherwise…


Nice ad hominem. Not surprising to say the least. 

Posted

 

 

 

There are two primary groups who lash out against Moms for Liberty.

 

One is a group of weak-minded trolls who pounce on whatever they are told to like cats helplessly chasing the red dot at the end of a laser pointer. They are party shills and the moment their leaders point that laser pen they are ready to pounce.

 

The rest of them are sick people who cover their true intentions with "identity." They try to push sexualized materials to children and pull kids into adult scenarios, and then they cover themselves in rainbows so that they can claim the backlash is because of their "identity." Anyone with even a hint of objectivity can do minimal research and find many people representing many diverse groups who stand against the same things that you do.

 

 

https://twitter.com/BreaktheProblem/status/1730607737191420406

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Melissa Boche of the Los Angeles chapter threatened to gun down librarians. 
 

https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/06/17/a-moms-for-liberty-leader-threatens-gun-violence-against-librarians-audio/

Thank you for providing this compelling evidence to back up your claim. Did you know that this B word was also an anti-mask activist? Literal Nazi!

 

I would also like to thank you for the link as it backs up my claim that you are a moron. It’s likely that you did not read the article but if you did read it your reading comprehension blows. That particular Nazi lives in Arkansas not Los Angeles. Really nice work on your part. Go back to pretending to read the LA Blade and enjoy. 

Edited by JDHillFan
a moron
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Thank you for providing this compelling evidence to back up your claim. Did you know that this B word was also an anti-mask activist? Literal Nazi!

 

I would also like to thank you for the link as it backs up my claim that you are a moron. It’s likely that you did not read the article but if you did read it your reading comprehension blows. That particular Nazi lives in Arkansas not Los Angeles. Really nice work on your part. Go back to pretending to read the LA Blade and enjoy. 


Okay buddy, keep pretending your side is in any way the majority and not just a bunch of toddlers screeching about bedtime 

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 


Family so long as they’re white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants***

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Ah, the old "projection" claim when the point hits to close to home.

 

Sad, but consistent.

 

 

 

Meanwhile:

 

you're the sad confused one bonnie girl...everyone else understands the differences,  the things aren't linked.  stop lying.  why do you try to protect the terrible?   it makes u terrible too.  you're on the wrong side of every moral and ethical issue.  did u learn nothing at that 3rd rate school? u  sure u didn't actually go to Hillsdale?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
45 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 


Family so long as they’re white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants***

 

 

And this is the poster PPP, who was whining about "projection" earlier.

 

There is NO evidence of this implied racism by Roundy, none whatsoever.

 

So, he invents it, because he can't really argue against Parents looking out for their children against porn.

 

 

 

33 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

you're the sad confused one bonnie girl...everyone else understands the differences,  the things aren't linked.  stop lying.  why do you try to protect the terrible?   it makes u terrible too.  you're on the wrong side of every moral and ethical issue.  did u learn nothing at that 3rd rate school? u  sure u didn't actually go to Hillsdale?

 

And this ?, well I don't really have to point it out do I ?

 

The stream of thoughts, incomplete sentences and illogical comparisons, all capped by an attempted insult.

 

I think that we have all seen the  deterioration  in Joe's posts.

 

I , for one, will keep him in my prayers.

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

And this is the poster PPP, who was whining about "projection" earlier.

 

There is NO evidence of this implied racism by Roundy, none whatsoever.

 

So, he invents it, because he can't really argue against Parents looking out for their children against porn.

 

 

 

 

And this ?, well I don't really have to point it out do I ?

 

The stream of thoughts, incomplete sentences and illogical comparisons, all capped by an attempted insult.

 

I think that we have all seen the  deterioration  in Joe's posts.

 

I , for one, will keep him in my prayers.

 

 

 

 

yes DR Freud, I'll pray for you too.  You need it more than I.  look towards the light....and you want to prescribe behavior to the entire population....

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:

Okay buddy, keep pretending your side is in any way the majority and not just a bunch of toddlers screeching about bedtime 

You are in the position of telling moms they are wrong in their concern for their kids schooling, and telling schools/teachers/librarians they are right for stocking their elementary schools with materials detailing oral and anal. 
 

One of us is definitely in the majority here. 
 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You are in the position of telling moms they are wrong in their concern for their kids schooling, and telling schools/teachers/librarians they are right for stocking their elementary schools with materials detailing oral and anal. 
 

One of us is definitely in the majority here. 
 

what about parents who have no problem with it.  who will control what their kids read regardless.  that's the ideal, non?  responsible parents making THEIR own decisions for THEIR kids.....

Posted
8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

what about parents who have no problem with it.  who will control what their kids read regardless.  that's the ideal, non?  responsible parents making THEIR own decisions for THEIR kids.....

It seems as though you are agreeing with me without realizing it. Parents deciding is good. Schools wanting to get into oral/anal discussion seems less good, non?
 

They can bring all the child appropriate anal/oral books in the world into their home. None of them are banned here in the US. Seems odd for a homophobe like yourself to think it important to have them in elementary schools. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

It seems as though you are agreeing with me without realizing it. Parents deciding is good. Schools wanting to get into oral/anal discussion seems less good, non?
 

They can bring all the child appropriate anal/oral books in the world into their home. None of them are banned here in the US. Seems odd for a homophobe like yourself to think it important to have them in elementary schools. 

it's about principle.  u should try it....and who decides what is appropriate?  you or me or the hari Krishnas and the kama sutra.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

it's about principle.  u should try it....and who decides what is appropriate?  you or me or the hari Krishnas and the kama sutra.


Kids can’t get into r rated movies, porn shops, strip clubs etc. plenty of rules for that stuff. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

The usual suspects here (and elsewhere) continue to push their false narratives regarding this organization

 

Here is a link for those of you interested.

 

You won't really be surprised about how they have been mischaracterized here.

 

It's what the Left does.

 

 

https://portal.momsforliberty.org/about/

 

Who We Are

 

We are Moms, Dads, Grands, Aunts, Uncles, Friends

  
Moms for Liberty welcomes all that have a desire to stand up for parental rights at all levels of government.

Our founders are Tiffany and Tina, moms on a mission to stoke the fires of liberty.  As former school board members, they witnessed how short-sighted and destructive policies directly hurt children and families. Now they are using their first-hand knowledge and experience to unite parents who are ready to fight those that stand in the way of liberty. 

 

 

Our Mission

Moms for Liberty is dedicated to fighting for the survival of America by unifying, educating and empowering parents to defend their parental rights at all levels of government. 

 

Our Vision

Americans empowered and thriving in a culture of Liberty.

 

Our Values

As Joyful Warriors:

We Stand for Truth

We Build Relationships

We Empower Others

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

it's about principle.  u should try it....and who decides what is appropriate?  you or me or the hari Krishnas and the kama sutra.

You have positioned yourself such that you think it important to have, in elementary schools, materials discussing anal/oral. So be it. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

You are in the position of telling moms they are wrong in their concern for their kids schooling, and telling schools/teachers/librarians they are right for stocking their elementary schools with materials detailing oral and anal. 
 

One of us is definitely in the majority here. 
 


No, my side is the one that doesn’t make up an enemy to attack in the name of “protecting children.” You don’t care about children, we knew that after Sandy Hook. You’re doing this to attack gay folks. That’s always been the goal. 

×
×
  • Create New...