Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, finn said:

Just for an intellectual exercise, nothing more, would it be plausible to trade Diggs and sign Hopkins, if Diggs went into full Diva mode? 

His contract makes it nearly impossible, they’ll eat a ton of dead cap. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Madden curse is in full swing now...

 

I'm not going to overreact, but we better have f-----g answers soon or I am going to do a whole lot of overreacting later.

 

W T F?!!!?!?!?

Posted
3 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

His contract makes it nearly impossible, they’ll eat a ton of dead cap. 

 

This!

I assumed the org had checking in with Diggs before the restructure. They didn't. With the way they ended the season that feels like common sense, but I guess not. 

In a worst case scenario, Diggs could tank this roster if he forces himself out just by his cap number alone.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mango said:

 

This!

I assumed the org had checking in with Diggs before the restructure. They didn't. With the way they ended the season that feels like common sense, but I guess not. 

In a worst case scenario, Diggs could tank this roster if he forces himself out just by his cap number alone.

You can't restructure a contract without both parties being involved.

  • Disagree 1
Posted

To make his point that losing is not acceptable, Diggs will miss mini-camp, training camp, and the regular season. Only then will the team learn how to win. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SWATeam said:

You can't restructure a contract without both parties being involved.

 

This isn't true, false. Most contracts are drawn up to include restructure. Teams can restructure a majority of players whenever they please. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

Madden curse is in full swing now...

 

I'm not going to overreact, but we better have f-----g answers soon or I am going to do a whole lot of overreacting later.

 

W T F?!!!?!?!?

 

Well at least we know who to put on ignore early...  :beer: 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Kornfed said:

If I had to explain it, you wouldn't understand.

Ah, assuming things without actually knowing anything must be your gimmick? 

7 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

This isn't true, false. Most contracts are drawn up to include restructure. Teams can restructure a majority of players whenever they please. 

I thought I’ve also heard this. I remember one of the podcasts saying Diggs restructure may not actually mean everything is fine. 
 

Things may not actually be fine. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, HereComesTheReignAgain said:

Based on the reports that Diggs is not at mandatory minicamp, this may not age well.

 

What happen to the reports that he was at Mini-Camp from this morning?  Yes my post was based on the concept he was there, which is what I got alerts on my phone about.  So are those reports wrong or the ones that he isn't there wrong?  I hate information in today's society, nothing is ever accurate

21 minutes ago, HereComesTheReignAgain said:

Based on the reports that Diggs is not at mandatory minicamp, this may not age well.

 

Alright I deleted it...like I said, my original comment was based on the early reports he was there, which must have been false.  If he isn't there for mandatory camp, then its a valid concern and story.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, finn said:

Just for an intellectual exercise, nothing more, would it be plausible to trade Diggs and sign Hopkins, if Diggs went into full Diva mode? 

No.  $40 mil cap hit for Diggs.  He’s going nowhere.

Posted
11 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

Ah, assuming things without actually knowing anything must be your gimmick? 

I thought I’ve also heard this. I remember one of the podcasts saying Diggs restructure may not actually mean everything is fine. 
 

Things may not actually be fine. 

So, i think converting salary into a bonus is at team's discretion, they can do it any time they like. The only net effect is getting paid early and making it guaranteed money..all good for the player.

 

Reducing salary, increasing term etc..a  real restructure, still needs to be agreed upon by both parties.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said:

So, i think converting salary into a bonus is at team's discretion, they can do it any time they like. The only net effect is getting paid early and making it guaranteed money..all good for the player.

 

Reducing salary, increasing term etc..a  real restructure, still needs to be agreed upon by both parties.

Technically couldn’t 2 teams come to an agreement? Bills could get a 3rd but the other team takes on the dead cap?

Posted
1 minute ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

Technically couldn’t 2 teams come to an agreement? Bills could get a 3rd but the other team takes on the dead cap?

My understaning, and it could be wrong is Bills paid that money, it goes on their cap no matter what.

 

Now, I think Bills could retain some of his salary, but that does not give cap relief for sunk costs in bonuses

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...