Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/3/2023 at 1:27 AM, BarleyNY said:

I chalk this up to it being a good sign. It’s not nearly enough to be certain of his future, but it’s a positive. I’d love to see how he did against zone too. 

 

Less well against zone. That is where most of his struggles were. He had a tendency to run away from the soft spots when he should have been sitting.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 6/2/2023 at 11:37 AM, Jauronimo said:

I believe he ran a few incorrect routes and found himself in the doghouse.  

And missed a few assignments along the way too. I remember one play that they showed where he went in motion and had to block coming down the line. He whiffed on the block and play was blown up. 

 

Hopefully with the addition of a 2nd real TE, some of the motion assignments and blocking along the line fall to Kincaid (or Hines), leaving the slot wr to push upfield more. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...