Motorin' Posted October 30 Posted October 30 1 minute ago, Starr-Bills said: Nothing like mocking the victim, cool dude. Sounds Jussie
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 30 Posted October 30 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Nothing like mocking the victim, cool dude. Her story is probably fake because there is no political campaigning allowed within the designated area of a polling station. Its something that I've witnessed being enforced several times. For example, campaign signs are not allowed. Neither is encouraging voters to cast their ballot for one of another candidate. Political parties have representatives at the stations to watch for these types of activities and to enforce the rules. The clue to that is she said she's from California. If "MAGA" set up shop the DNC's rep would have observed the activity and ordered they be moved. Edited October 30 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 30 Posted October 30 10 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Nothing like mocking the victim, cool dude. Nothing like being a gullible dupe. Cool dude.
ChiGoose Posted October 30 Posted October 30 45 minutes ago, Motorin' said: You seem like someone who is unfamiliar with the possability of institutional corruption. Which is rather odd, given that you live in the land of Maddigan, Ed Burke, Blagojevich, and on and on. It's exactly the opposite. Because I live in a state that has experienced rampant institutional corruption, I'm acutely aware of it and it's implications for the people. That's why I think poll watchers and election observers are a good thing (so long as they follow the rules). The GOP uses them too. The goal is literally to ensure that rules are being followed. If you have the opportunity, it could be a good thing to try yourself. Years ago, I got to be an observer on a recount. It was pretty cool to see and be a part of. 1
Motorin' Posted October 30 Posted October 30 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: It's exactly the opposite. Because I live in a state that has experienced rampant institutional corruption, I'm acutely aware of it and it's implications for the people. That's why I think poll watchers and election observers are a good thing (so long as they follow the rules). The GOP uses them too. The goal is literally to ensure that rules are being followed. If you have the opportunity, it could be a good thing to try yourself. Years ago, I got to be an observer on a recount. It was pretty cool to see and be a part of. Of course it's a good thing. It's just not that hard to believe that a small number of dishonest brokers could enable fraudulent activity, especially to keep their own corrupt system in place. 1
4th&long Posted October 30 Posted October 30 Trump already knows he is losing. Same old tired playbook. 1
B-Man Posted October 30 Posted October 30 On 10/28/2024 at 11:36 AM, B-Man said: The correct response. Virginia Takes Noncitizen-Voting Case to Supreme Court ahead of Election by David Zimmerman Virginia attorney general Jason Miyares on Monday took the commonwealth’s noncitizen-voter case to the Supreme Court, after a lower court blocked officials from purging their voter rolls of noncitizen aliens. A federal appeals court on Sunday backed a lower court’s Friday ruling that ordered Virginia to restore some 1,600 suspected noncitizens who are ineligible to vote to the state’s voter rolls. Miyares and Governor Glenn Youngkin responded with a pledge to take the case to the Supreme Court with just nine days left before the election. They followed through on Monday. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/virginia-ag-vows-to-take-noncitizen-voting-case-to-supreme-court-ahead-of-election/ . Supreme Court clears way for Virginia to remove 1,600 alleged noncitizens from voter rolls By Melissa Quinn The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed Virginia to move forward with its removal of roughly 1,600 alleged noncitizens from its voter rolls just days before the 2024 election. The high court granted a request from state officials to pause a lower court order that blocked Virginia from continuing its systematic voter removal program that was launched in August, exactly 90 days before Election Day. A provision of the National Voter Registration Act requires states to complete programs aimed at purging ineligible voters from registration lists up to 90 days before federal elections. The injunction issued by the lower court will harm "Virginia's sovereignty, confuse her voters, overload her election machinery and administrators, and likely lead noncitizens to think they are permitted to vote, a criminal offense that will cancel the franchise of eligible voters," state officials wrote. Federal and Virginia law prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-virginia-voter-rolls/ . 1 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 30 Posted October 30 On 10/28/2024 at 12:17 PM, Roundybout said: Sounds like they have the right to vote to me Incorrect. In related news the sun is expected to set in the west tonight.
BillsFanNC Posted October 30 Author Posted October 30 But poll watchers says the King. I'm old enough to remember republican poll watchers being kicked out of polling and ballot counting centers in many states, made to stand 30+ feet away or behind cardboard covered windows in the 2020 most secure election in US history. That's the King's idea of transparent democracy. Chicago style! 3
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted October 30 Posted October 30 34 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Years ago, I got to be an observer on a recount. It was pretty cool to see and be a part of. 1 2
BillsFanNC Posted October 30 Author Posted October 30 This didn't happen. Not possible. 2020 was the most secure election in US history. 1
Roundybout Posted October 30 Posted October 30 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: This didn't happen. Not possible. 2020 was the most secure election in US history. This rocks. No voter intimidation for you!
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 30 Posted October 30 Just now, Roundybout said: This rocks. No voter intimidation for you! Or fair elections........
ChiGoose Posted October 30 Posted October 30 People big mad about the Virginia case do realize that it was orchestrated to cause this controversy, right? There was absolutely nothing preventing Virginia from purging voters before the 90-day deadline. They waited because they wanted the headlines. If they actually cared about this issue, they would have just done it sooner to avoid this mess. 1
BillsFanNC Posted October 30 Author Posted October 30 These didn't happen either. How do I know? Because 2020 was the most secure election in US history, that's how. If you don't think the communists will be even more brazen this time around then I don't know what to tell you. Election day is going to be a massive shlit show. 1
Motorin' Posted October 30 Posted October 30 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: People big mad about the Virginia case do realize that it was orchestrated to cause this controversy, right? There was absolutely nothing preventing Virginia from purging voters before the 90-day deadline. They waited because they wanted the headlines. If they actually cared about this issue, they would have just done it sooner to avoid this mess. You're imputing motive with no evidence other than concocting a reason that makes your side in the right. Perhaps they wanted to do it at a point in time after which non-citizens could no longer register to vote after the process? 2
Recommended Posts