Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said:

Meanwhile government contractor with top secret clearance donating 100’s of millions to the felon, coordinating his pac with the campaign and talking to foreign enemies (Putin)on the down low for years. 
 

I know let’s start a rumor that the Dems are doing what we already are doing. I mean really are you this dull. (Thanks for the vocab lesson BIMF I used it in a sentence)

You need a question mark after dull.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I guess he feels he is going to lose, that explains this stupid outburst 

 

 

 


Indont know why we think this is anything new, his fan base knows it’s the only way they can stay relevant.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

LFG common sense!!!  
 

 

 

Is this real? I've been let down by the legal process before. Something like this comes out and then they allow it to continue pending appeal and then it gets overturned etc etc. This would be huge if it sticks. They wouldn't be able to watch the election play out and then come up with extra ballots. But they still could fudge the numbers on the cities where it takes "weeks" to certify

Posted
36 minutes ago, K D said:

Is this real? I've been let down by the legal process before. Something like this comes out and then they allow it to continue pending appeal and then it gets overturned etc etc. This would be huge if it sticks. They wouldn't be able to watch the election play out and then come up with extra ballots. But they still could fudge the numbers on the cities where it takes "weeks" to certify


 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, K D said:

Is this real? I've been let down by the legal process before. Something like this comes out and then they allow it to continue pending appeal and then it gets overturned etc etc. This would be huge if it sticks. They wouldn't be able to watch the election play out and then come up with extra ballots. But they still could fudge the numbers on the cities where it takes "weeks" to certify

 

It is real.  But, though the Appelate Court reversed the lower court's ruling in part, and vacated it in part, it also remanded the case back to the lower court.  And it specifically stated in the decision that "(t)oday’s decision says nothing about remedies."

 

So, it isn't necessarily the victory it seems from reading that tweet about it.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

And to think that fraud like this could happen just a few years after we all experienced the most secure election in US history!

 

Inconceivable. 

 

 

 

  • Angry 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 10/25/2024 at 12:03 PM, Big Blitz said:


 


 

 

 

The correct response.

 

 

Virginia Takes Noncitizen-Voting Case
to Supreme Court ahead of Election

by David Zimmerman

 

Virginia attorney general Jason Miyares on Monday took the commonwealth’s noncitizen-voter case to the Supreme Court, after a lower court blocked officials from purging their voter rolls of noncitizen aliens.

 

A federal appeals court on Sunday backed a lower court’s Friday ruling that ordered Virginia to restore some 1,600 suspected noncitizens who are ineligible to vote to the state’s voter rolls.

 

Miyares and Governor Glenn Youngkin responded with a pledge to take the case to the Supreme Court with just nine days left before the election. They followed through on Monday.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/virginia-ag-vows-to-take-noncitizen-voting-case-to-supreme-court-ahead-of-election/

 

 

.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

The correct response.

 

 

Virginia Takes Noncitizen-Voting Case
to Supreme Court ahead of Election

by David Zimmerman

 

Virginia attorney general Jason Miyares on Monday took the commonwealth’s noncitizen-voter case to the Supreme Court, after a lower court blocked officials from purging their voter rolls of noncitizen aliens.

 

A federal appeals court on Sunday backed a lower court’s Friday ruling that ordered Virginia to restore some 1,600 suspected noncitizens who are ineligible to vote to the state’s voter rolls.

 

Miyares and Governor Glenn Youngkin responded with a pledge to take the case to the Supreme Court with just nine days left before the election. They followed through on Monday.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/virginia-ag-vows-to-take-noncitizen-voting-case-to-supreme-court-ahead-of-election/

 

 

.


You’re going to lose again. You cannot disenfranchise voters any longer.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
Just now, Roundybout said:


You’re going to lose again. You cannot disenfranchise voters any longer.

I think you mean legal voters, right?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


You’re going to lose again. You cannot disenfranchise voters any longer.

 

Are you in possession of the facts here?

 

These are self identified non citizens.

The state's actions were a continuation of a precedent set in 2006 by gov Tim Kaine.

Recognize that name?

Hillary's running mate and favorite of on of our staunch Dem poster's here?

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Are you in possession of the facts here?

 

These are self identified non citizens.

The state's actions were a continuation of a precedent set in 2006 by gov Tim Kaine.

Recognize that name?

Hillary's running mate and favorite of on of our staunch Dem poster's here?

 


Sounds like they have the right to vote to me 

Posted
2 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Sounds like they have the right to vote to me 

 

Non citizens, in this case self proclaimed non citizens do not have that right.

×
×
  • Create New...