ChiGoose Posted September 28 Posted September 28 50 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why is it so hard for your side to follow the law? Buddy, they don’t even understand what the law is. They’ve gone so far down the internet rabbit hole that they can’t tell up from down anymore. The only thing that anchors them is Dear Leader. 1
B-Man Posted September 28 Posted September 28 5 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: 3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: The CORRECT headline. The one the usual suspects try to spin. (and fail) 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Like clockwork with the msm talking points on why election integrity is a bad thing. Duplicate ballots are awesome. Leave them, out there. 1
ChiGoose Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Tommy Eyerolls keeps to his script. Just parroting the talking points he knows by heart. Trying to think critically hurts his head too much. Better to just repeat what he’s been told to say.
Backintheday544 Posted September 28 Posted September 28 1 hour ago, B-Man said: The CORRECT headline. The one the usual suspects try to spin. (and fail) We have a federal law that says voter roles cannot be purged 90 days before an election. Alabama is trying to 87 days. so the correct headline is Alabama violates federal law to remove voters. I understand you love Trump and with that comes being ok with violating laws. He is a 34 time felon and cannot own a nonforprofit in NY. But for fun, why do you personally think it’s ok for Alabama to not follow the Federal law? 1
B-Man Posted September 28 Posted September 28 What is scandalous is that the Justice Department is explicitly saying that Alabama is removing eligible voters from the rolls. Alabama's removing ineligible voters. They're going far beyond enforcing a law, they're misrepresenting Alabama's activities in a clear attempt to discredit the state's electoral process. Also a foretaste of what's to come, if Harris/Walz win. DOJ's statements show they're usurping the states' rights, trying to define who is an isn't an "eligible voter" for the states. (Borrowed from a well-known poster)
Thurmal34 Posted September 29 Posted September 29 Only one reason to care about who is eligible. Your ideas are outdated and incapable of adaptation to what your voter base wants. so instead of adapting to what the people want, the answer is to tell everyone that the only ones that are right are you. lol.
Doc Posted September 29 Posted September 29 On 9/28/2024 at 12:32 PM, B-Man said: The CORRECT headline. The one the usual suspects try to spin. (and fail) They need their votes.
B-Man Posted September 29 Posted September 29 THEFT: Biden-Harris Admin May Have Used Taxpayer Money to Hide Medicare Price Hike Before Election Amy Curtis A while back, we told you about the Biden administration stealing money from Medicare to offset the cost of electric vehicle tax credits. Doing so caused a spike in prescription prices for seniors -- maybe that's why Kamala said they have to cut their pills in half -- and the Biden administration tried to bribe insurers to hold off on price hikes until after the election. https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/09/29/gop-investigating-why-biden-harris-took-medicare-money-to-pay-for-evs-n2401547
B-Man Posted October 1 Posted October 1 Dominion and Georgia Face Heat in Court by Eric Nelf Questions raised about Dominion voting machines finally got the best form of sunlight today – sworn testimony in open court subject to cross-examination. Election security experts Clay Parikh and Ben Cotton testified in Fulton County (Atlanta) Superior Court today. They testified that they were able to identify the master encryption passwords stored in plain text and unsecured on the databases housed in Dominion voting machines. They further testified that basic security protocols call for these passwords to be kept separate and secret so that only authorized persons can access them. This information was turned over to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in March 2024 at the latest, according to the lawyers at the hearing. The allegations, if true, are explosive and have deep ramifications going back years. Many claims of election voting machine issues have been either overstated or outright fabricated, which has done much to discredit any legitimate attempts to increase election confidence. In fact, the left likely wants the right to make overstated or incorrect claims regarding election integrity. It provides them a weapon to use when legitimate questions are raised. It has the added bonus of likely suppressing voter turnout on the right by dampening enthusiasm. That does not mean our election processes are above scrutiny, however. And today, two experts raised legitimate questions that deserve answers. https://redstate.com/eric-neff/2024/09/30/dominion-and-georgia-face-heat-in-court-n2179992 1
Starr-Bills Posted October 1 Posted October 1 Open primaries, ending gerrymandering and popular vote would force both parties towards the middle. Which surprisingly seems to be what the people want. Hummm. Must be some one else who benefits from the current system 🧐 1
Backintheday544 Posted October 3 Posted October 3 https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/03/trump-election-conspiracist-tina-peters-sentenced.html Republicans election rigger gets 9 years. 1
Starr-Bills Posted October 3 Posted October 3 53 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/03/trump-election-conspiracist-tina-peters-sentenced.html Republicans election rigger gets 9 years. Here is a twitter link for those here who don’t understand hyperlinks. 1
Scraps Posted October 3 Posted October 3 20 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Here is a twitter link for those here who don’t understand hyperlinks. Well, she did get credit for 2 days served. 1
BillsFanNC Posted October 3 Author Posted October 3 36 minutes ago, B-Man said: Whatever you do, don't you dare call them commies. 1
B-Man Posted October 4 Posted October 4 A 69-year-old patriot, and mother of a Seal who died serving his country, Tina Peters has just been sentenced to NINE years in prison for attempting to expose corruption within the election process she was responsible for overseeing. They're trying to frighten anyone who might spill the beans 1
Recommended Posts