Westside Posted September 17 Posted September 17 Not a peep from the fascist left. They must overwhelmingly support voter fraud. What a bunch of simpletons.
B-Man Posted September 17 Posted September 17 On 9/14/2024 at 10:26 AM, B-Man said: BREAKING: Pennsylvania Court Ruling a Massive Election Integrity Win on Mail-In Ballots Remember during the 2020 elections, when several blue states (including the commonwealth of Pennsylvania) rewrote on the fly the laws about how, when, and where mail-in ballots (AKA vote by mail) would be counted? It led to many voters becoming jaded and distrustful of a system that had been considered one of the most honest and free to hold elections in the world. Courts ended up striking down those revised laws, and now we have news of a massive win for election integrity on mail-in ballots by the state Supreme Court in one of those states--the Keystone state of Pennsylvania: https://redstate.com/beccalower/2024/09/13/new-court-ruling-a-big-election-integrity-win-on-mail-in-ballots-in-pennsylvania-n2179302 300,000 closer in a state decided by 90,000
Doc Posted September 18 Posted September 18 6 hours ago, B-Man said: Any replies ? He's a disenfranchised drinker!
B-Man Posted September 20 Posted September 20 Census Bureau Miscounts Always Mysteriously Favor Democrats By Ward Clark We are all familiar with the process of the decennial census, mandated by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution. The enumeration of the United States population is used, among other things, to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among the 50 states. We may remember that the loss of (productive) population in places like California and New York has caused those states to lose House seats since the 2020 tally. Now a House of Representatives inquiry into the conduct of the census reveals that miscounts in that tally may have been hiding that the loss in blue states may have been underestimated; the Census Bureau has apparently miscounted in many areas, and oddly enough, the miscounts always seem to favor Democrats. https://redstate.com/wardclark/2024/09/20/census-bureau-miscounts-always-mysteriously-favor-democrats-n2179563 https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/09/18/exclusive-house-oversight-probes-why-census-miscounts-boost-democrats-in-electoral-college-apportionment/ .
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20 Posted September 20 At least some entities are trying to strengthen election integrity. 1
B-Man Posted September 20 Posted September 20 Keep up the fake narrative about the 'safe' 2020 election. 2
ChiGoose Posted September 20 Posted September 20 21 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: At least some entities are trying to strengthen election integrity. I think you included the wrong Tweet / link. The one you posted is about people pushing a policy to make election counts less accurate and take much, much longer. Basically, the opposite of integrity. 1
B-Man Posted September 22 Posted September 22 On 9/20/2024 at 1:19 PM, ChiGoose said: I think you included the wrong Tweet / link. The one you posted is about people pushing a policy to make election counts less accurate and take much, much longer. Basically, the opposite of integrity. Hahahahahhaahaha. Your ignorance is showing Goose. Simple, Basic, Georgia Election Ballot Rule Sends Left-Wing Activists into Apoplexy A very simple ballot counting rule was affirmed by the Georgia election board on Friday in a 3-2 vote. The “hand count” ballot rule (183-1:12) is very basic and simple. Essentially it says all the paper ballots must be hand counted and matched to the number of people recorded electronically to the vote. Example, if 1,000 votes are electronically counted, there should be 1,000 physical ballots to match. This is not complicated and will not take much time. The ballots are not being checked for voting accuracy, or vote recording/candidate specifics. However, despite the simplicity of the new rule, the DNC and left-wing activists are furious about the simple process. “This is nothing more than an 11th-hour effort by Donald Trump and his ‘pit bulls’ to slow down the counting of ballots so they can attack and undermine any result they don’t like,” Jamie Harrison, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said on Friday afternoon. What Georgia election rule 183-1-12 does through the hand count is stop the issue of scanning a ballot more than once to count a single ballot (or batch of ballots) as multiple votes of the batch. One ballot, one vote, one voter, match the counts and easy peasy. If you count 100 one-dollar bills, you should have $100. However, if you count 100 one-dollar bills and your sales report shows $500 sold there’s a problem. Ballots are the same. Seeing the leftists go bananas over this single and simple rule enforcement, makes me wonder how much the Clyburn team need to scan batches of ballots multiple times. If they lose Pennsylvania (Philly and Pittsburgh) as a fraud vector for success, Georgia becomes much more important. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/09/21/simple-basic-georgia-election-ballot-rule-sends-left-wing-activists-into-apoplexy/ 1
ChiGoose Posted September 22 Posted September 22 31 minutes ago, B-Man said: Hahahahahhaahaha. Your ignorance is showing Goose. Simple, Basic, Georgia Election Ballot Rule Sends Left-Wing Activists into Apoplexy A very simple ballot counting rule was affirmed by the Georgia election board on Friday in a 3-2 vote. The “hand count” ballot rule (183-1:12) is very basic and simple. Essentially it says all the paper ballots must be hand counted and matched to the number of people recorded electronically to the vote. Example, if 1,000 votes are electronically counted, there should be 1,000 physical ballots to match. This is not complicated and will not take much time. The ballots are not being checked for voting accuracy, or vote recording/candidate specifics. However, despite the simplicity of the new rule, the DNC and left-wing activists are furious about the simple process. “This is nothing more than an 11th-hour effort by Donald Trump and his ‘pit bulls’ to slow down the counting of ballots so they can attack and undermine any result they don’t like,” Jamie Harrison, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said on Friday afternoon. What Georgia election rule 183-1-12 does through the hand count is stop the issue of scanning a ballot more than once to count a single ballot (or batch of ballots) as multiple votes of the batch. One ballot, one vote, one voter, match the counts and easy peasy. If you count 100 one-dollar bills, you should have $100. However, if you count 100 one-dollar bills and your sales report shows $500 sold there’s a problem. Ballots are the same. Seeing the leftists go bananas over this single and simple rule enforcement, makes me wonder how much the Clyburn team need to scan batches of ballots multiple times. If they lose Pennsylvania (Philly and Pittsburgh) as a fraud vector for success, Georgia becomes much more important. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/09/21/simple-basic-georgia-election-ballot-rule-sends-left-wing-activists-into-apoplexy/ Once again, you are projecting your own ignorance, B-Man. Not surprising that some rando blog is missing the point, nor that you are as well. Seems that is a requirement of being a conservative these days... People are not good at counting large quantities of things. They are slow and they are inaccurate. This is why banks have money counting machines and don't rely on tellers to hand count large quantities of currency. Using a small number like 1,000 is designed to make this proposal seems simple and easy, but it's obviously misleading. There were 4,999,960 ballots cast in Georgia in 2020. Given population trends, there will likely be more in 2024. The rule requires three different people to hand count each ballot, so if we have 5,000,000 ballots, that means 15,000,000 instances of a person manually counting. This is the best case scenario. Given the numerous studies showing that people are bad at this (hence why we have machines do large counting for us), the odds that they arrive at the same correct number on the first try is probably close to zero. Which will probably mean doing it again, and then probably again, and again, and so on. So how long is it going to take to certify?
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 23 Posted September 23 28 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: They do things like this, hold the election, declare the democratic candidate the winner, and when legal challenges are filed they send Marc Elias and his DNC lawyer team to the location and file countless motions to block all objections on procedural grounds and other legal process points. They don't win motions to throw out objections to election fraud based on evidence or fact. 3 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 23 Author Posted September 23 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: They do things like this, hold the election, declare the democratic candidate the winner, and when legal challenges are filed they send Marc Elias and his DNC lawyer team to the location and file countless motions to block all objections on procedural grounds and other legal process points. They don't win motions to throw out objections to election fraud based on evidence or fact. This and get their activists in the reliable media to flood the zone with declarations of the most secure election in US history. 3
B-Man Posted September 24 Posted September 24 Trump-Hating Colorado Secretary Of State Loses Another Election Integrity Battle by M.D. Kittle Jena Griswold, Colorado’s rabidly leftist Secretary of State who will forever be known for her anti-democratic drive to knock former President Donald Trump off the ballot, has suffered another election law loss in federal court. The U.S. District Court for the Colorado District last week issued an order demanding the Democrat secretary of state release Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) reports suspected of containing dead registrants on the state’s voter rolls. The reports, according to a settlement, include individuals who may have died within the past three years. It’s another significant election integrity victory for the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), https://thefederalist.com/2024/09/23/trump-hating-colorado-secretary-of-state-loses-another-election-integrity-battle/ . 1
Recommended Posts