Westside Posted November 4 Posted November 4 33 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: I am sure this person being filmed terribly has evidence for her claims, right? Can you link to that? Evidence? Since when does a leftist need evidence?
ChiGoose Posted November 4 Posted November 4 7 minutes ago, Westside said: Evidence? Since when does a leftist need evidence? You’re telling on yourself
BillsFanNC Posted November 4 Author Posted November 4 8 minutes ago, Westside said: Evidence? Since when does a leftist need evidence? Shhh don't tell the "attorney" that sworn affidavits are evidence. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted November 4 Posted November 4 1 hour ago, wnyguy said: Real nice, now dispute this one- This was already debunked. I know you don't care but just pointing this out for anyone else that doesn't let random people on X think for them. The claim that overseas ballots arrived "in sequence" (or with consecutive serial numbers) as evidence of fraud in the 2020 election was also debunked. This claim, often cited alongside other allegations of election irregularities, misinterprets standard procedures in how overseas and military ballots are handled, particularly in states like Georgia where these concerns were initially raised. Here’s a breakdown of the findings: Ballot Processing Procedures: Overseas and military ballots are typically printed and issued on demand, meaning they’re produced and numbered consecutively as they’re sent out. These ballots, especially in states with large overseas populations, often have sequential numbers because they’re processed in bulk batches. This is standard and not indicative of fraudulent activity . Investigations and Recounts: In Georgia, a state that faced scrutiny for election procedures, ballots underwent multiple recounts and audits, including a hand audit of the entire vote in a statewide risk-limiting audit. No evidence of fraud, including claims about sequential overseas ballots, was found in these audits. Both state and federal election officials confirmed the legitimacy and accuracy of the results after thorough examination Evidence of Manipulation**: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and other oversight bodies confirmed that the 2020 election was one of the most secure in U.S. history. This finding included verifying ballot authenticity, the integrity of counting machines, and the procedural soundness of how absentee and overseas ballots were processed. In short, sequential numbers in overseas ballots are a normal aspect of election logistics, not evidence of fraud. 1 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted November 4 Posted November 4 7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: You’re telling on yourself I saw another one earlier complaining about claims being vetted. That's what type of people are crying foul as their master has fake electors.
BillsFanNC Posted November 4 Author Posted November 4 This isn't evidence either. After a "water main break" sent everyone including poll watchers and media home in Fulton county, they announced that counting would be stopped until the following morning... But wait what did these five women who stayed behind do? Not only did they keep counting ballots with no poll watchers observing, they scanned the same stacks of ballots multiple times. You can see it as clear as day in the video, but not if you live under a green sky. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 4 Posted November 4 14 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: I saw another one earlier complaining about claims being vetted. That's what type of people are crying foul as their master has fake electors. I saw D presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar sharing grave concerns about the security of our elections in the lead up to 2020. I think many in the country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the election results were declared unassailable, beyond question and ironclad just a short time later. In this case, of course, “many” = liberal voters.
L Ron Burgundy Posted November 4 Posted November 4 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I saw D presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar sharing grave concerns about the security of our elections in the lead up to 2020. I think many in the country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the election results were declared unassailable, beyond question and ironclad just a short time later. In this case, of course, “many” = liberal voters. You mean after all the faulty claims were debunked and recounts were completed? Makes sense!
BillsFanNC Posted November 4 Author Posted November 4 (edited) 7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I saw D presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar sharing grave concerns about the security of our elections in the lead up to 2020. I think many in the country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the election results were declared unassailable, beyond question and ironclad just a short time later. In this case, of course, “many” = liberal voters. Even liberal icons Hillary, Schiff, Lieu and Kamala got in on the voting machines are vulnerable conspiracy theory....before they magically became impenetrable. Edited November 4 by BillsFanNC
L Ron Burgundy Posted November 4 Posted November 4 A normal person would be embarrassed by now. To be wrong every single time. "Here's the video you can see it clear as day. So what if i have no context and am lying about the details!" Voter fraud claims proven to be true - 0 (I am of course talking mass fraud, not onesy twosy instances which are usually maga assshats) DEBUNKED The claim regarding a water main break and vote recount in Georgia during the 2020 election was investigated and debunked. The incident, which took place at the State Farm Arena in Fulton County, Georgia, involved a burst pipe (later described as an overflowing urinal) that caused a brief delay in vote counting on election night. Here’s a breakdown of what actually happened: Water Leak and Initial Reporting: On election night, a water leak temporarily halted vote counting at the arena. It was quickly resolved, and no ballots were damaged. The incident initially led to some misinformation that a major water main break had severely impacted the vote-counting process, which was later corrected. Transparency in Vote Counting: Despite the delay, officials continued to count votes that evening and throughout the night. Observers and the media were allowed to return, and counting continued under supervision. This transparency was confirmed by state election officials, who assured that the incident did not affect the integrity of the vote count. Investigations and Audits: After numerous audits and a statewide hand recount in Georgia, there was no evidence of fraud related to the water leak or the vote-counting process at State Farm Arena. Georgia’s Secretary of State and multiple independent audits confirmed the accuracy of the ballot counts, ruling out any irregularities or tampering related to the water leak. The claim that the water leak was a cover for fraudulent activity was found to be unfounded after these thorough investigations.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted November 4 Posted November 4 7 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: A normal person would be embarrassed by now. To be wrong every single time. "Here's the video you can see it clear as day. So what if i have no context and am lying about the details!" Voter fraud claims proven to be true - 0 (I am of course talking mass fraud, not onesy twosy instances which are usually maga assshats) DEBUNKED The claim regarding a water main break and vote recount in Georgia during the 2020 election was investigated and debunked. The incident, which took place at the State Farm Arena in Fulton County, Georgia, involved a burst pipe (later described as an overflowing urinal) that caused a brief delay in vote counting on election night. Here’s a breakdown of what actually happened: Water Leak and Initial Reporting: On election night, a water leak temporarily halted vote counting at the arena. It was quickly resolved, and no ballots were damaged. The incident initially led to some misinformation that a major water main break had severely impacted the vote-counting process, which was later corrected. Transparency in Vote Counting: Despite the delay, officials continued to count votes that evening and throughout the night. Observers and the media were allowed to return, and counting continued under supervision. This transparency was confirmed by state election officials, who assured that the incident did not affect the integrity of the vote count. Investigations and Audits: After numerous audits and a statewide hand recount in Georgia, there was no evidence of fraud related to the water leak or the vote-counting process at State Farm Arena. Georgia’s Secretary of State and multiple independent audits confirmed the accuracy of the ballot counts, ruling out any irregularities or tampering related to the water leak. The claim that the water leak was a cover for fraudulent activity was found to be unfounded after these thorough investigations. Post the link
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 4 Posted November 4 11 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: You mean after all the faulty claims were debunked and recounts were completed? Makes sense! If you're talking about the vindication of Trump on the debunked charges of Russian conspiracy and silly charges of illegitimate elections, my recollection would be........ yes, Warren, Klobuchar and others expressed their doubts of security after the Mueller debacle that had you scared to deaf* and looking for Ivan at the local Blockbuster. However, their collective concerns pre-dated any Trumpian claims of lost/stolen elections and recounts, back when it was cool to set the table for follow up in the event of a dem loss. Geesh, don't you pay attention to what presidential front runners for your party are saying? *Yup, scared so bad you stopped listening! 29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Even liberal icons Hillary, Schiff, Lieu and Kamala got in on the voting machines are vulnerable conspiracy theory....before they magically became impenetrable. I've been saying for years that the set-up for stolen elections was going down either way, and they were setting the stage to contest. There's precedence, of course.
L Ron Burgundy Posted November 4 Posted November 4 6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: If you're talking about the vindication of Trump on the debunked charges of Russian conspiracy and silly charges of illegitimate elections, my recollection would be........ yes, Warren, Klobuchar and others expressed their doubts of security after the Mueller debacle that had you scared to deaf* and looking for Ivan at the local Blockbuster. However, their collective concerns pre-dated any Trumpian claims of lost/stolen elections and recounts, back when it was cool to set the table for follow up in the event of a dem loss. Geesh, don't you pay attention to what presidential front runners for your party are saying? *Yup, scared so bad you stopped listening! I've been saying for years that the set-up for stolen elections was going down either way, and they were setting the stage to contest. There's precedence, of course. Ah yes your age old tradition to comparing firecrackers to a-bombs I know. They did it before! It's BS. Going back to Mueller eh? I wonder how history will look at that. I don't think they'll see it through the partisan lens you do. A lot of charges were filed because of it. Sure, they didn't dig up enough to charge your "fearless" leader. He did end up handing out some pardons though, you don't usually do that unless someone is guilty. 1
BillsFanNC Posted November 4 Author Posted November 4 29 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Post the link It can't. IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED !!!! is all it has. Source: LRon's rage. 1
4th&long Posted November 4 Posted November 4 49 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I saw D presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar sharing grave concerns about the security of our elections in the lead up to 2020. I think many in the country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the election results were declared unassailable, beyond question and ironclad just a short time later. In this case, of course, “many” = liberal voters. All you had to do was prove it. You got laughed out of court. Fox News go sued. Your boy Rudy lost everything. How many lawyers lost their licenses to practice because of your cult leader? Maga losers. Hahahahahaha 24 hours left and maga is done. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 5 Posted November 5 4 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Ah yes your age old tradition to comparing firecrackers to a-bombs I know. They did it before! It's BS. Going back to Mueller eh? I wonder how history will look at that. I don't think they'll see it through the partisan lens you do. A lot of charges were filed because of it. Sure, they didn't dig up enough to charge your "fearless" leader. He did end up handing out some pardons though, you don't usually do that unless someone is guilty. Look Ron, you asked a question that revealed you had no idea about the concerns expressed by Senator Warren, so I provided context to guide you to the answer. The problem imo is that if you were/are concerned about election security (2016, 2020, 2024) it is importantly, having a fundamental grasp of historical concerns is important. It seems fairly clear to me that you’re limiting yourself to news sites that cater to you bias, and the challenge there is you can come off looking like an uninformed bumpkin. Anyway, now you know the time frame. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted November 5 Posted November 5 27 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Look Ron, you asked a question that revealed you had no idea about the concerns expressed by Senator Warren, so I provided context to guide you to the answer. The problem imo is that if you were/are concerned about election security (2016, 2020, 2024) it is importantly, having a fundamental grasp of historical concerns is important. It seems fairly clear to me that you’re limiting yourself to news sites that cater to you bias, and the challenge there is you can come off looking like an uninformed bumpkin. Anyway, now you know the time frame. Firecrackers and a-bombs. The proof is the actions thereafter.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 5 Posted November 5 10 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Firecrackers and a-bombs. The proof is the actions thereafter. Not at all, Ron. The proof here is in your posts, my reply, and your stunning lack of knowledge of an issue supposedly of importance to you. It’s ok though, you got to use the firecracker line again (and then, again, a short time later). 1
Recommended Posts