Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

They won't need to cheat anymore. Their plan is to make the illegals all legal. They dropped hundreds of thousands of illegals into swing states and plan to give them free everything. They will be slaves to the system just like the black voters have been. It's the new slavery. The Dems are who they have always been.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

More "garbage" news. . . . . . . 

 

New: Buzz Aldrin Endorses Trump

Politico 12:00 PM | October 30, 2024

    

Famed Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin on Wednesday endorsed Donald Trump for president, citing Trump’s prioritization of space exploration while he was in office.

 

“Over time, I have seen our government’s approach to space wax and wane,” Aldrin wrote in a statement. “But under the first Trump Administration, I was impressed to see how human space exploration was elevated as a policy of high importance again.”

 

Aldrin endorsed Trump in 2016 too, as Politico notes. Still an interesting counter to the "garbage" remark made by Biden yesterday. 

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/10/30/2024-elections-live-coverage-updates-analysis/buzz-aldrin-endorses-trump-00186248

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

WALZing his way through this. Embarrassing. 


I dont think people care as much about minute army semantics as you think

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


I dont think people care as much about minute army semantics as you think

Probably only those that saw combat and their loved ones. Those wounded and the families of those killed doubly so. Don’t let that stop you from defending the weaseling you see from Vindman and Walz. 
 

minute army semantics…spoken like someone without the balls to serve. 

Edited by Biden is Mentally Fit
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Probably only those that saw combat and their loved ones. Those wounded and the families of those killed doubly so. Don’t let that stop you from defending the weaseling you see from Vindman and Walz. 
 

minute army semantics…spoken like someone without the balls to serve. 


You serve?

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


You serve?

Enlisted but rejected for a medical condition I was unaware of. It was an era when seeing combat would have been highly unlikely. I would never be so bold as to minimize the courage and sacrifice of others in order to fluff a politician. Do you honestly believe men and women that dodged bullets don’t care that people like Walz and Vindman lie about having done so? What in your life experience would lead you to this opinion?

 

If someone asks you or I if we saw combat, it’s an easy answer. Why is it difficult for Walz and Vindman and why do you make excuses for them?

 

Minute army semantics is embarrassing. You should scratch that from your lexicon. 

Edited by Biden is Mentally Fit
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

In New Hampshire, Lily Tang Williams is running against Democrat Maggie Goodlander (who is married to Biden NatSec adviser Jake Sullivan). Here's a little more about the "polar opposite" candidates: 

 

Chinese born “survivor of communism,” Lily Tang Williams of Weare, the Republican nominee, who became a U.S. citizen in 1994 went toe-to-toe with Nashua native, Groton and Yale Law graduate and member of the politically connected Tampsoi family of Nashua, Maggie Goodlander during a debate before the Nov. 5 general election on WMUR-TV.

 

 

Watch some of the highlights. This is how it's done: 

 

https://twitchy.com/dougp/2024/11/02/communist-china-survivor-lily-tang-williams-goes-scorched-earth-against-dem-opponent-during-debate-n2403133

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Enlisted but rejected for a medical condition I was unaware of. It was an era when seeing combat would have been highly unlikely. I would never be so bold as to minimize the courage and sacrifice of others in order to fluff a politician. Do you honestly believe men and women that dodged bullets don’t care that people like Walz and Vindman lie about having done so? What in your life experience would lead you to this opinion?

 

If someone asks you or I if we saw combat, it’s an easy answer. Why is it difficult for Walz and Vindman and why do you make excuses for them?

 

Minute army semantics is embarrassing. You should scratch that from your lexicon. 


I don’t believe they care because it’s a made up nothing burger the right wing latches on to. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


I don’t believe they care because it’s a made up nothing burger the right wing latches on to. 

Deep thoughts by Roundy. 
 

That you don’t care has zero bearing on how combat vets are likely to feel. Pathetic on your part. 

Posted

I’m having a hard time believing this. She’s usually the best but if she’s right, this race is already over. 
 

We’ve been seeing evidence of herding lately but Seltzer doesn’t herd so this is interesting. 
 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I’m having a hard time believing this. She’s usually the best but if she’s right, this race is already over. 
 

We’ve been seeing evidence of herding lately but Seltzer doesn’t herd so this is interesting. 
 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I’m having a hard time believing this. She’s usually the best but if she’s right, this race is already over. 
 

We’ve been seeing evidence of herding lately but Seltzer doesn’t herd so this is interesting. 
 

 


Absolutely shocking poll.  
 

Shes either way off (Emerson has Trump +10, which is more in line with others)

 

OR

 

Something she found hasn’t been picked up elsewhere and will result in a Harris landslide 

 

If she’s accurate, she’s a legend.

 

If she’s wrong, she’s destroyed her reputation… especially with how much weight her poll carries in terms of momentum narrative down the stretch.  (Betting market for PA just flipped to Harris off the heels of this news)

 

Edited by SCBills
Posted
22 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Absolutely shocking poll.  
 

Shes either way off (Emerson has Trump +10, which is more in line with others)

 

OR

 

Something she found hasn’t been picked up elsewhere and will result in a Harris landslide 

 

If she’s accurate, she’s a legend.

 

If she’s wrong, she’s destroyed her reputation… especially with how much weight her poll carries in terms of momentum narrative down the stretch. 
 


Agreed. It’s absolutely shocking. I was expecting something around Trump +8. 
 

I found the article with a deep dive interesting: Iowa Poll: Kamala Harris leapfrogs Donald Trump to take lead near Election Day. Here's how

 

If she’s found something, it appears it’s Harris with a devastating 20-point lead with women combined with a surprisingly strong performance with voters aged 55+ at 2-points over Trump.
 

It’s a big if, but if she’s right, and those numbers play out nationally, we’re looking at Harris being closer to 400 EVs than 300.  It would be stunning  

Posted
Just now, ChiGoose said:


Agreed. It’s absolutely shocking. I was expecting something around Trump +8. 
 

I found the article with a deep dive interesting: Iowa Poll: Kamala Harris leapfrogs Donald Trump to take lead near Election Day. Here's how

 

If she’s found something, it appears it’s Harris with a devastating 20-point lead with women combined with a surprisingly strong performance with voters aged 55+ at 2-points over Trump.
 

It’s a big if, but if she’s right, and those numbers play out nationally, we’re looking at Harris being closer to 400 EVs than 300.  It would be stunning  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, K D said:

 

 


Right, this is an argument in Seltzer’s favor.

 

She’s never been known to herd and routinely goes out on a limb (and is often proven correct).

×
×
  • Create New...