BillStime Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, Doc said: As an aside, I love how she keeps using my "[this will be] worse than Watergate, 9/11..." line without realizing I'm making fun of her/them all with it, because that's what they said about Russian collusion. But keep using it BSTime. I laugh everytime you do!
aristocrat Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 14 minutes ago, BillStime said: But you freaks use indictments as a benchmark, right? You’re a useful idiot. Just can’t have a free thought. Step back and realize what happened. 1 3
Tommy Callahan Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 8 minutes ago, BillStime said: LOL. if CNN says its a dud. 1
nedboy7 Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 “Crime of the century”. $6.5 million spent over 3 years. no charges. yes I can see how this is a win for the cult. 2
BillStime Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: You’re a useful idiot. Just can’t have a free thought. Step back and realize what happened. Why do you invest so much in losers?
BillStime Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 Just now, John from Riverside said: So when will charges be filed? So much for LOCK HER UP
B-Man Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: So when will charges be filed? They won't. Durham Serves Up a Heap of Obvious Too Long After the Damage Was Done. “Well, chalk another one up for the rightwing nutjobs. We keep being proven right but not getting much for it. It’s very irritating for those of us who are old enough remember when there were consequences for things like pathological lying.” https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2023/05/16/the-morning-briefing-durham-serves-up-a-heap-of-obvious-too-long-after-the-damage-was-done-n1695676 2
aristocrat Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: Why do you invest so much in losers? why do you support people attempting to overthrow the presidency? 1 1
John from Riverside Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, aristocrat said: why do you support people attempting to overthrow the presidency? It looks to me like they were steps missing nothing that they can criminally charge on or else they’d be doing it But overthrowing the presidency do you really want to go there after January 6? 1
aristocrat Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said: It looks to me like they were steps missing nothing that they can criminally charge on or else they’d be doing it But overthrowing the presidency do you really want to go there after January 6? why do you think jan 6 occurred? Four years of gaslighting the country and calling your politcal enemies traitors despite no evidence what do you think the consequences would be? The dems literally hijacked a rightfully elected president, no matter your opinion on him, and tore the country apart to take him down just because they lost an election. Things like Jan 6 were consequences of that. Don't pretend to be some innocent party here. Step back and look at the big picture 1 1 1 3
John from Riverside Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, aristocrat said: why do you think jan 6 occurred? Four years of gaslighting the country and calling your politcal enemies traitors despite no evidence what do you think the consequences would be? The dems literally hijacked a rightfully elected president, no matter your opinion on him, and tore the country apart to take him down just because they lost an election. Things like Jan 6 were consequences of that. Don't pretend to be some innocent party here. Step back and look at the big picture That’s interesting I think that it happened because you had a president that was saying that the last election was rigged and it’s still saying it If anybody is gaslighting, it’s Trump doing it to his own people It’s going to be interesting to see how it turns out if Donald Trump keeps on telling his people that elections are not fair, they may not come out to vote
SectionC3 Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, aristocrat said: why do you think jan 6 occurred? Four years of gaslighting the country and calling your politcal enemies traitors despite no evidence what do you think the consequences would be? The dems literally hijacked a rightfully elected president, no matter your opinion on him, and tore the country apart to take him down just because they lost an election. Things like Jan 6 were consequences of that. Don't pretend to be some innocent party here. Step back and look at the big picture Hoax. There’s good people on both sides. And January 6 occurred because a bunch of violent morons were brainwashed by Trump. Just now, John from Riverside said: That’s interesting I think that it happened because you had a president that was saying that the last election was rigged and it’s still saying it If anybody is gaslighting, it’s Trump doing it to his own people It’s going to be interesting to see how it turns out if Donald Trump keeps on telling his people that elections are not fair, they may not come out to vote Georgia Senate runoff speaks to that.
aristocrat Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 Just now, John from Riverside said: That’s interesting I think that it happened because you had a president that was saying that the last election was rigged and it’s still saying it If anybody is gaslighting, it’s Trump doing it to his own people It’s going to be interesting to see how it turns out if Donald Trump keeps on telling his people that elections are not fair, they may not come out to vote what are you thoughts on these election deniers? Also, so you think doing a sham years long investigation where they ran stories of a sitting president colluding with Russia which turned out to be false would have no consequences? You can't be this naive 2
John from Riverside Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: what are you thoughts on these election deniers? Also, so you think doing a sham years long investigation where they ran stories of a sitting president colluding with Russia which turned out to be false would have no consequences? You can't be this naive I think that it’s OK to raise questions about elections. If you don’t think that they’re fair it’s not like we haven’t seen it done over the years but once again I point out that Donald Trump is the ***** devil he takes what people have done in the past, and he puts it on cocaine, and then spins the wheel Instead of doing what was best for the country after he lost the election, he got his people even more riled up and January 6 happened there really is no other way around it. This is the way that it went. 1 2
B-Man Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 Back to the Durham Report: Durham Report Spells Out How Much FBI Investigation Relied on 'Leads' From Trump's 'Political Opponents' https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/05/16/durham-report-spells-out-how-much-fbi-investigation-relied-on-leads-from-trumps-political-opponents-n746647 . 1 1
aristocrat Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said: I think that it’s OK to raise questions about elections. If you don’t think that they’re fair it’s not like we haven’t seen it done over the years but once again I point out that Donald Trump is the ***** devil he takes what people have done in the past, and he puts it on cocaine, and then spins the wheel Instead of doing what was best for the country after he lost the election, he got his people even more riled up and January 6 happened there really is no other way around it. This is the way that it went. Once again. The left claimed he was a traitor, that the Russians and him colluded to fix the election and would put him in prison for that. Constant reports on cnn that the smoking gun was coming and he'd be led out of the white house in handcuffs. Trump is no saint and i've never claimed that. But again, I'll ask you...did you think running a false investigation for years that tore his presidency and the country apart would have low impact consequences? Rub two brain cells together and think about that. Try for one time to think for yourself. 1 2
John from Riverside Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Once again. The left claimed he was a traitor, that the Russians and him colluded to fix the election and would put him in prison for that. Constant reports on cnn that the smoking gun was coming and he'd be led out of the white house in handcuffs. Trump is no saint and i've never claimed that. But again, I'll ask you...did you think running a false investigation for years that tore his presidency and the country apart would have low impact consequences? Rub two brain cells together and think about that. Try for one time to think for yourself. Donald Trump did a fine job by himself of tearing up his presidency. The twice indicted president did not get indicted because he was a traitor because the Mueller report didn’t have enough information for that. He did plenty of other things. It looks to me like the FBI made a procedural error. They should have done a preliminary investigation before they went into a full on investigation. At the end of the day, if there is a way to criminally charge anybody, you better believe the Republicans would be doing it 1
Doc Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Once again. The left claimed he was a traitor, that the Russians and him colluded to fix the election and would put him in prison for that. Constant reports on cnn that the smoking gun was coming and he'd be led out of the white house in handcuffs. Trump is no saint and i've never claimed that. But again, I'll ask you...did you think running a false investigation for years that tore his presidency and the country apart would have low impact consequences? Rub two brain cells together and think about that. Try for one time to think for yourself. That's "doing what's best for the country" I guess...
aristocrat Posted May 16, 2023 Posted May 16, 2023 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said: Donald Trump did a fine job by himself of tearing up his presidency. The twice indicted president did not get indicted because he was a traitor because the Mueller report didn’t have enough information for that. He did plenty of other things. It looks to me like the FBI made a procedural error. They should have done a preliminary investigation before they went into a full on investigation. At the end of the day, if there is a way to criminally charge anybody, you better believe the Republicans would be doing it lol man i can't imagine living in that brain of yours. just a struggle bus 1 1
Recommended Posts