Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:

so happy we are past that now. 2017, rioting/murdering over statues and ranting about football players not saluting the flag enough. Man we were dumb as a nation. 

 

covid sucked but it helped put things in perspective a little. worry about your health not a statue FFS

And right here we’ve learned another invaluable lesson today:

 

Another thing thar died, was/is IRONY! 
 

Unbelievable. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:

 

well there were a lot of dumbasses during Covid for sure, the former president being one of them. 

 

I'm talking about now that we are (mostly) past covid. Doesn't rioting over a General Lee statue just seem really pathetic these days? We survived a global pandemic, you think I care about the well being of a statue

 

 

 

 

Are they handing out diplomas on a matchbook over at SUNY Amherst these days? (Kidding, a bit) The statue and false Nazi quote was long BEFORE Covid. And yes, I think it’s utterly childish to go out and destroy public property because you don’t like a statue. 

Posted
2 hours ago, SCBills said:

“If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth” -Western Media

 

*With the exception of voter fraud, right?  The BIG LIE must never die.

 

2 hours ago, SCBills said:

Do you believe non-violent first time offenders who got caught up in the moment

 

giphy.gif

 

2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

1) favoring federal authority over state authority 

2) opposing electoral college 

3) general support of centralization of power 

 

That's cute. Just last week, the leading GQP Presidential nominee would not dismiss the idea of signing a national abortion ban if reelected.

 

Idiots

 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

*With the exception of voter fraud, right?  The BIG LIE must never die.

 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

That's cute. Just last week, the leading GQP Presidential nominee would not dismiss the idea of signing a national abortion ban if reelected.

 

Idiots

 

 

 

 

As an executive order or by signing a bill that’s been passed by houses of Congress? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

As an executive order or by signing a bill that’s been passed by houses of Congress? 

 

Is that really a question?

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

No, he said it. No different from him wanting to pardon the said same people. 

 

We are not stupid, you guys are just unbelievable 


lol you are hilarious

Posted
11 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:

 

You wouldn't know anything about SUNY Amherst you are not from around here

Wrong! I most definitely was. Nice try though. 

16 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Is that really a question?

 

Yes, it’s a question. That’s what the question mark means. How about answering it? 

Posted
10 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


You’re a Biden supporter. Which according to polls is far worse lol

No, according to elections--you know, the thing that counts--I'm a winner and you are a Trump supporter 

8 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

What lies do i parrot around here like u do?

What lies? 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, according to elections--you know, the thing that counts--I'm a winner and you are a Trump supporter 

What lies? 

Do u act like a 2 year old all the time?

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Do u act like a 2 year old all the time?

Do u? 

 

Two year-olds can't make message board comments. How about, "Do you act like a child all the time?" 

 

Isn't that better? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Do u? 

 

Two year-olds can't make message board comments. How about, "Do you act like a child all the time?" 

 

Isn't that better? 

Annnnddd there you go proving my point. You are just like this administration, oatmeal for brains!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Wrong! I most definitely was. Nice try though. 

Yes, it’s a question. That’s what the question mark means. How about answering it? 

 

Well, obviously he can't sign an EO; so it would have to come across his desk as a bill assuming the GQP wins majority in both. BUT he would have the option to veto it.

 

Posted

 

 

 

News anchors and pundits have repeated lies about Donald Trump and race so often that some of these narratives seem true, even to Americans who embrace the fruits of the president’s policies.  The most pernicious and pervasive of these lies is the “Charlottesville Hoax,” the fake-news fabrication that he described the neo-Nazis who rallied in Charlottesville, Va., in August 2017 as “fine people.” 

 

But like many fake news narratives, repetition has helped cement this one into a reasonably plausible storyline for all but the most skeptical consumers of news.  In fact, over the weekend, Fox News host Chris Wallace pressed White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney on why Trump has not given a speech “condemning … white supremacist bigotry.”  Well, Chris, he has, and more than once.  The most powerful version was from the White House following Charlottesville and the heartbreaking death of Heather Heyer.  President Trump’s succinct and direct words:

 

“Racism is evil, and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fact check: Meme on Trump 'very fine people' quote ...

USA Today

The media misquoted Trump's 'very fine people on both sides' statement about Charlottesville

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/17/fact-check-trump-quote-very-fine-people-charlottesville/5943239002/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full text: Trump’s comments on white supremacists in Charlottesville

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/15/full-text-trump-comments-white-supremacists-alt-left-transcript-241662

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Well, obviously he can't sign an EO; so it would have to come across his desk as a bill assuming the GQP wins majority in both. BUT he would have the option to veto it.

 

Thanks! So in essence what you’re saying is you’re in favor of ultimate rule by the Executive Branch. I thought you were opposed to that sort of thing….no? Sounds like ‘democracy’ only works for you when the voters agree with YOUR position. 
(Now, just so you know, I am also not in favor of such a ban.)

Posted

 

The Big Lies: Trump on Charlottesville etc.

 

Don't forget this all-time beauty, the usual suspects here are STILL unable to admit their mistake.

 

 

Released TODAY:

 

Durham releases final report 

 

Special Counsel John Durham released a damning final report Monday after more than three years investigating the Russia collusion probe, declaring the FBI had no verified intelligence or evidence when it opened up the Crossfire Hurricane probe of President Donald Trump's campaign in the summer of 2016.

 

"Neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation," Durham wrote in a 300-plus page report sent to Congress and others and obtained by Just the News. DOJ was slated to make the report public later Monday.

 

The prosecutor faulted the FBI and Justice Department for failing to follow their own standards and allowing a probe to persist, including the surveillance of an American citizen without basis under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

 

"Based on the review of Crossfire Hurricane and related intelligence activities, we concluded the Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report," Durham wrote.

 

"The FBI personnel also repeatedly disregarded important requirements when they continued to seek renewals of that FISA surveillance while acknowledging -- both then and in hindsight -- that they did not genuinely believe there was probably cause to believe that the target was knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of foreign power."

 

The report's release touched off instant outrage and impact on Capitol Hill, where House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan tweeted he planned to summon Durham for testimony next week.

 

Durham specifically faulted the FBI for relying on evidence from Hillary Clinton's campaign, including the Steele dossier, saying leadership lacked the necessary distrust of politically motivated allegations.

 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/john-durham-releases-final-report-concluding-fbi-had-no

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

Back to the thread, Big lies that continue to be held by the Left.

 

 

 

Guess we know why Rep. Adam Schiff didn’t release that smoking gun evidence he had.

 

He lied

 

 

 

 

Accountability is a one way street in DC.

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...