Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

The rapist still can’t get over losing the election.  How pathetic is this traitor?  

you would help your position by using actual terms vs made up ones.

 

hard to take someone using terms backwards, seriously.

 

 

1 minute ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

protesters?  

 

SMH

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

So you support releasing that trash, because of something, something 

 

Ok 

more like equality in the judicial system like its supposed to be.

 

Comprehension is key.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

more like equality in the judicial system like its supposed to be.

 

Comprehension is key.

 

So, because something, something, ya ok 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you support releasing that trash, because of something, something 

 

Ok 

 

You support no charges being brought to people who destroyed homes, businesses to the tune of nearly half a billion dollars? Riots that lead to 4 deaths? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Love it. The TDS tears are so very delicious.

 

This is why it's ok to have the PPP commies on ignore. I just need a one minute Jake Tapper clip to sum up their commie insanity. 

 

 

1 minute ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

You support no charges being brought to people who destroyed homes, businesses to the tune of nearly half a billion dollars? Riots that lead to 4 deaths? 

 

Not only will commies ignore that, they will support locking up trespassing grandmas.

 

There's no discussion to be had with commies.

 

Ignore and tag. Tag and ignore.

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

You support no charges being brought to people who destroyed homes, businesses to the tune of nearly half a billion dollars? Riots that lead to 4 deaths? 

Have no idea at all about that. 

 

Why would that apply to Trump pardoning insurectionists?

 

Do you not understand those two things have nothing to do with each other. Your excuses are lame 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

amplification.  more hate him than other GOP politicians.

 

 

Gets the viewers.  Maybe next week they can do a 90 minute segment on Biden wandering around the White House trying to figure out which door is for the bathroom and how the hell does the damn thing open?  All while he's whispering and looking at the ceiling thinking he sees ghosts.  That would be riveting entertainment. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

BillSy

”Not that I can recall” is actually the appropriate answer. I know this Twitter nitwit wants to make it into something but any lawyer will tell you that it’s actually the right thing to say.

Move on! 


I guess I’m more conservative than you because Trump’s behavior was NOT acceptable then:

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d77b3b9f0caafb8857e0
 

And it’s not acceptable now

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7dxsyaway7lfqdhbyws

 

But according to cult:

 

SO

MUCH

WINNING

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Have no idea at all about that. 

 

Why would that apply to Trump pardoning insurectionists?

 

Do you not understand those two things have nothing to do with each other. Your excuses are lame 

 

Never said they had anything to do with each other, but both were protests, both were called "riots" by each political party. 

  • One protest/riot resulted in 30 million dollars in damages and over 1,000 people being charged 
  • The other protest/riot resulted in 500 million dollars in damages and under 100 people being charged, most charges were dropped

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

Never said they had anything to do with each other, but both were protests, both were called "riots" by each political party. 

  • One protest/riot resulted in 30 million dollars in damages and over 1,000 people being charged 
  • The other protest/riot resulted in 500 million dollars in damages and under 100 people being charged, most charges were dropped

 

Right, so why bring it up? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


I guess I’m more conservative than you because Trump’s behavior was NOT acceptable then:

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d77b3b9f0caafb8857e0
 

And it’s not acceptable now

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7dxsyaway7lfqdhbyws

 

But according to cult:

 

SO

MUCH

WINNING

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Can you try and stick somewhat close to responding to my post? Even just somewhat would be appreciated. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Right, so why bring it up? 

 

Why not? Do you support the dropping of charges for riots who caused half a billion in damages? Yes or no? Stop avoiding the question. It's not a difficult one... 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

Why not? Do you support the dropping of charges for riots who caused half a billion in damages? Yes or no? Stop avoiding the question. It's not a difficult one... 

I plead the 5th 

 

Trump pardoning those trash people is wrong. Let them rot in jail 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

Why not? Do you support the dropping of charges for riots who caused half a billion in damages? Yes or no? Stop avoiding the question. It's not a difficult one... 

Answering the question isn't difficult but its impossible.  Although this quote below is specifically addressing the mindset of journalists its a simple explanation about the mindset of posters too.  It sounds about right to me (other than the use of pronouns "she" and "he" which implies in the example the she is objective and the he is subjective). 

 

"decision-making expert Julia Galef identifies two mindsets that people can adopt: “the soldier” and “the scout.” The scout is the epitome of the traditional reporter. She wants to understand. She wants an accurate picture of the situation, and she works hard to be unblinkered by ideological biases and motivated reasoning. By contrast, the soldier just wants to win. He doesn’t want to understand the other side, and he’s only interested in information that helps him defeat the enemy.

Most progressive journalists see themselves as soldiers.

 

They see the world in us versus them terms, and they don’t want to do anything that might be construed as helping the other side. Skeptical reporting of a claim of racism might be used by political opponents to say racism isn’t real. Credible reporting on the lab-leak theory means admitting Trump might have been right about something. Neither can be tolerated."

 

Soldiers will dodge or ignore the question.  A scout would answer it.  Your dealing with a soldier for the cause so name, rank, and serial number only.

 

That's also why debate and reason can be futile and senseless.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Can you try and stick somewhat close to responding to my post? Even just somewhat would be appreciated. 

 

My focus is/was on the NASTY part - because I will never cheer that on like the cult.

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Westside said:

Why do you carry so much hate towards someone you’ve never met? Has to be more than just a different political belief?

never met you and don't much like you or Irv.  I suspect the feeling is mutual...

40 minutes ago, BillStime said:

These degenerates praise Trump because he validates their racism and xenophobia and that is worth everything to them.

Been saying this since 2016.  He has taken the robes off .  At least we often know who were dealing with, how they "think" and therefore how they can be defeated.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...