Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Stuartjohn said:

 

No he was to blame for 13 seconds!!

 

Nope, that is 100% on coaching. They are ultimately responsible. They dropped the ball multiple times in a matter of 13 seconds.

  • Agree 2
Posted
11 hours ago, boyst said:

Levi Wallace is buried behind Patrick Peterson and once projected starter Ahkello Witherspoon. Joey Porter, Jr. comes in with lots of fanfare and will be shoved down everyone's throats Tevon Diggs style, while fellow rookkie Cory Trice is also in Pittsburgh.

 

He is owed $5.5mm while a hit of only $1.5mm.

 

If he was cut should we consider bringing him back to Buffalo as a depth CB behind White, Elam, Jackson and Benford (who maybe moving to safety?).

 

Fair question. Well-constructed post.

 

10 hours ago, streetkings01 said:

He’s one of those players that only fits our system.

 

Tre White was starting to be used in press coverage more frequently before his injury. Elam is a press corner too. I believe that the transition from Frazier to McDermott will include the Bills playing less off coverage.

 

10 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

That isn't that bad and it is better than Tre White was last year. 

 

I wouldn't bring Levi back to start, but if they want to bring him back as depth to fight for a spot I wouldn't hate it. 

 

10 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

When did he have his touch? 🤣

 

Jokes aside, because I do believe part of Levi's "struggles" were based on how our Defensive system pushes the ball to the #2 option, I'd welcome him back for depth. He's a better CB5 option than Jamarcus Ingram or Kyler McMichael. Especially once the injury bugs start biting.

 

White

Elam

(Johnson)

Benford

Dane Jackson

Wallace

(Lewis/Neal)

 

Nice looking group imo.

 

If he came back for the veteran minimum I'd be fine with it but I doubt Levi would think that coming back to Buffalo as a depth player would be a good career decision.

 

10 hours ago, FireChans said:

I mean I guess you could call old legs Josh Norman a "replacement" attempt, but a 1 year deal for a known quantity in the McD defense is just as much a depth signing.

 

There were other replacement attempts... Kevin Johnson, Vontae Davis, Phillip Gaines if I recall correctly.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said:

Levi was the only guy who stood up and took some responsibility for 13 seconds.  Everybody else dove for cover.  He can play on my team any time.

After he left for the Steelers.  I swear McDermott had the team go all Fight Club after the game in "the first rule about 13 seconds is we don't talk about 13 seconds."  

Posted
4 hours ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

There were other replacement attempts... Kevin Johnson, Vontae Davis, Phillip Gaines if I recall correctly.

 

 

That isn't quite right. Gaines and Davis were brought in as FAs in 2018 before Wallace was signed as an UDFA after that year's draft. Davis retired in game 2 and Gaines got first shot at replacing him, sucked, and that is when Levi first got his shot. Levi replaced them. Not the other way around. 

 

Kevin Johnson came the next year. He was a 1 year $3m deal and was definitely brought into compete. Maybe they thought he'd flat beat Levi out, but he didn't though at times in the season they job shared. Then in 2020 came Josh Norman. It was really only those two guys who might have been efforts to replace Levi. He beat them both out and then held off the challenge from Dane Jackson in 2021.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
8 hours ago, Stuartjohn said:

 

No he was to blame for 13 seconds!!

you need to read up on that around here.

 

it is a dead horse of a topic but he was one of the symptoms not the problem.

8 hours ago, Stuartjohn said:

 

No he was to blame for 13 seconds!!

you need to read up on that around here.

 

it is a dead horse of a topic but he was one of the symptoms not the problem.

Posted
5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

That isn't quite right. Gaines and Davis were brought in as FAs in 2018 before Wallace was signed as an UDFA after that year's draft. Davis retired in game 2 and Gaines got first shot at replacing him, sucked, and that is when Levi first got his shot. Levi replaced them. Not the other way around. 

 

Kevin Johnson came the next year. He was a 1 year $3m deal and was definitely brought into compete. Maybe they thought he'd flat beat Levi out, but he didn't though at times in the season they job shared. Then in 2020 came Josh Norman. It was really only those two guys who might have been efforts to replace Levi. He beat them both out and then held off the challenge from Dane Jackson in 2021.

 

All true but same general idea... as an undrafted free agent Levi wasn't supposed to be a 4 year starter for the Bills.

 

He was never supposed to be the guy.

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

All true but same general idea... as an undrafted free agent Levi wasn't supposed to be a 4 year starter for the Bills.

 

He was never supposed to be the guy.

 

Correct. But we are not talking about him coming back to be a starter either.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Correct. But we are not talking about him coming back to be a starter either.

What's crazy is that I could see him starting if he came here in 2023 the Elam was inconsistent and how sophomore slumps go, then Dane Jackson being no different than Jackson (though the Bills have been grooming him to be a contributer)

Posted

Levi was among those banished for the 13 second debacle.  The special teams coach that didn't call for a squib kickoff.  Levi for stupidly guarding the sidelines even though the Chiefs had 3 timeouts left and did not need to use the sidelines.  

 

Some people who shared responsibility were essentially too big to fail -- too important to cut.  McDermott, Frazier, Edmunds.  But a marginal CB?  C-ya.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Utah John said:

Levi was among those banished for the 13 second debacle.  The special teams coach that didn't call for a squib kickoff.  Levi for stupidly guarding the sidelines even though the Chiefs had 3 timeouts left and did not need to use the sidelines.  

 

Some people who shared responsibility were essentially too big to fail -- too important to cut.  McDermott, Frazier, Edmunds.  But a marginal CB?  C-ya.

the ST coach called the squib is what we all understood; the word never got to the kicker to kick a squib and there was blame on McD for that.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Utah John said:

Levi was among those banished for the 13 second debacle.

 

He had an offer on the table that was pretty close to the Steelers before he saw he was wearing black & yellow shorts and made his decision. Had Beane not been jerked around by McKissic, he would have countered the Steelers offer and re-signed Wallace. Your idea he was "banished" is not accurate.

Posted
14 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Nope, that is 100% on coaching. They are ultimately responsible. They dropped the ball multiple times in a matter of 13 seconds.

 

 

Levi made it very plain that the coaching was not to blame, that the communication between himself and Poyer was to blame for that play.

 

And nobody has come out and said it, but it sure looks like Farwell being let go tells us who it was who broke the chain in getting the word to the kicker on that kickoff that wasn't a squib. 

 

That and Cheetah, Kelce and Mahomes being the best in football at that time and playing at the top of their abilities. Nobody blames the KC defense for not being able to stop Allen on those last three or four drives, even when there was virtually no time. Nor should they. The coaches sure get their share of the responsibility, but the players on both sides also should be blamed. Not to mention that coin. If it falls tails, Buffalo wins that game, there's zero doubt in my mind.

 

Again, they get their share of the blame, but putting it on them 100% says more about you than it does about what actually happened.

Posted
4 hours ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

All true but same general idea... as an undrafted free agent Levi wasn't supposed to be a 4 year starter for the Bills.

 

He was never supposed to be the guy.

 

 

 

There's not really a thing about who is supposed to be the guy. Whoever plays best, that's who's supposed to be the guy.

5 hours ago, boyst said:

you need to read up on that around here.

 

it is a dead horse of a topic but he was one of the symptoms not the problem.

 

 

 

It is indeed a bit of a dead horse. But he was more than a symptom. He himself has said that they called the coaches called the right play, and that the communication between Poyer and Wallace didn't work in the moment.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

Again, they get their share of the blame, but putting it on them 100% says more about you than it does about what actually happened.

 

Yes, it says I know how Leadership and Accountability works. Thank you!

Just now, Thurman#1 said:

But he was more than a symptom. He himself has said that they called the coaches called the right play, and that the communication between Poyer and Wallace didn't work in the moment.

 

You understand that is him taking ownership of his part in it, which is the right thing to do. And because his other option is to throw everyone else under the bus and he may need them for a job someday. This is what he's supposed to say, and good on him. But it isnt all on him. The coaches failed their players.

Posted
On 5/11/2023 at 12:33 AM, boyst said:

Levi Wallce is buried behind Patrick Peterson and once projected starter Ahkello Witherspoon. Joey Porter, Jr. comes in with lots of fanfare and will be shoved down everyone's throats Tevon Diggs style, while fellow rookkie Cory Trice is also in Pittsburgh.

 

He is owed $5.5mm while a hit of only $1.5mm.

 

If he was cut should we consider bringing him back to Buffalo as a depth CB behind White, Elam, Jackson and Benford (who maybe moving to safety?).

 

 

You're misstating the numbers a bit there.

 

The $1.5M is dead cap, not cap hit. And dead cap doesn't matter to us, as it's the Steelers who gave him that signing bonus.

 

And he's not owed $5.5, that's cap hit. His salary will be $4M. That's what the Bills would have to pay.

 

In their current financial state, I don't see them paying him that to be a backup. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Yes, it says I know how Leadership and Accountability works. Thank you!

 

You understand that is him taking ownership of his part in it, which is the right thing to do. And because his other option is to throw everyone else under the bus and he may need them for a job someday. This is what he's supposed to say, and good on him. But it isnt all on him. The coaches failed their players.

 

 

That's absolute nonsense. Wallace didn't have two options. He had thousands. Here's one: "No comment." Here's another: "That's not for me to say." Here's another: "Well, everyone on that field gave 110% in that game and I still consider them all my brothers and yadda yadda yadda."

 

Instead he went far into depth explaining exactly and precisely why the fault for that play was not on the coaches but on the communication between he and Poyer.

 

And you may "know how Leadership and Accountability work," but you're the one who said it's 100% on the coaches. That would seem to indicate that assuming you do know how it works, you weren't using what you know when you said that. Yeah, they should take responsibility. But no, nobody who wants to figure out what really happened should just say it was 100% on the coaches. It wasn't. They deserve their share, but there was plenty to go around.

 

It isn't all on Wallace either? Yeah, very correct. That's why I didn't say it was all on him. I said the problem on that play was the communication between he and Poyer as he said, but that there was plenty of blame to go around including ... well, I already wrote it once, no need to do so again.

 

I really respect Levi, wish him the best, and wouldn't mind if he ended up back here at some point if the money works out.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

You're misstating the numbers a bit there.

 

The $1.5M is dead cap, not cap hit. And dead cap doesn't matter to us, as it's the Steelers who gave him that signing bonus.

 

And he's not owed $5.5, that's cap hit. His salary will be $4M. That's what the Bills would have to pay.

 

In their current financial state, I don't see them paying him that to be a backup. 

still to this point, the steelers could benefit cutting him for cap reasons.

 

and the other statement you made is about his integrity - he was honest and forward with what happened. i respect the hell out of that

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...