Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Goodell (booooooo) proposed Feb President day weekend for Super Bowl. 18 weeks. 
yeah, that dome!!!???  So, 1970s last regular game was Dec 10th. All you boomers saying today is same? Nov Dec Jan Feb. this is not a fall sport anymore!!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 12:22 PM, SoCal Deek said:

Nah….people just ran out of ways to call them expensive. 😉 Did you come up with a new one? 

Expand  

Nothing PG13 or less.  :) 

 

Back on topic, drove by last weekend and there is lots of steel taking shape.  They'll probably be finished by this Friday.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 12:30 PM, ScotSHO said:

Nothing PG13 or less.  :) 

 

Back on topic, drove by last weekend and there is lots of steel taking shape.  They'll probably be finished by this Friday.

Expand  

Feels like we should be due for the next installment of the drone flyover video…no? 

Posted

I genuinely despise the design as well. It’s not a joke when I say that these are the two images I picture when I see the renderings:

 

toilet-top.png

 

IMG-8688.jpg

 

Nothing about it seems great. Everything about it screams “average”. 

  • Dislike 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 2:38 AM, Since1981 said:

Goodell (booooooo) proposed Feb President day weekend for Super Bowl. 18 weeks. 
yeah, that dome!!!???  So, 1970s last regular game was Dec 10th. All you boomers saying today is same? Nov Dec Jan Feb. this is not a fall sport anymore!!

Expand  

Great point about how far into winter the schedule goes nowadays vs. the 70s when the season always ended before Christmas. If anything, the NFL should start the season earlier, but the broadcast networks won’t allow that as it would compete with the start of college football for ratings. 

Posted (edited)
  On 5/2/2024 at 3:11 PM, Einstein said:

I genuinely despise the design as well. It’s not a joke when I say that these are the two images I picture when I see the renderings:

 

toilet-top.png

 

IMG-8688.jpg

 

Nothing about it seems great. Everything about it screams “average”. 

Expand  

I'm sure it'll be nice enough. But with these cost overruns I can see them cutting back on details.

 

Here in lovely Manch-Vegas NH they built a ball park for the AA Blue Jays team the Fishercats in 2005. The original plan was for brick facades like Fenway Park. Very nice. But when costs went up we got corrugated metal siding instead.

 

Still a very nice ball park. I think it's a better design than Sahlen Field, with open concourses that allow you to see the game while at concessions. But corrugated metal siding is not brick.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 5/2/2024 at 3:11 PM, Einstein said:

I genuinely despise the design as well. It’s not a joke when I say that these are the two images I picture when I see the renderings:

 

toilet-top.png

 

IMG-8688.jpg

 

Nothing about it seems great. Everything about it screams “average”. 

Expand  

Fair enough, but I'm wondering what exactly you were expecting. Is it not better than the 'recently' constructed open air stadiums in the surrounding NE area of the country (Chicago, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Cincinnati, New York, New England, Philadelphia....to name more than a few)?

Edited by SoCal Deek
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 3:11 PM, Einstein said:

I genuinely despise the design as well. It’s not a joke when I say that these are the two images I picture when I see the renderings:

 

toilet-top.png

 

IMG-8688.jpg

 

Nothing about it seems great. Everything about it screams “average”. 

Expand  

Expensive 

Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 3:11 PM, Einstein said:

I genuinely despise the design as well. It’s not a joke when I say that these are the two images I picture when I see the renderings:

 

toilet-top.png

 

IMG-8688.jpg

 

Nothing about it seems great. Everything about it screams “average”. 

Expand  

Looking at your first image, you know damn well by now that the stadium isn’t coming with a retractable roof. 

  On 5/2/2024 at 3:28 PM, PromoTheRobot said:

I'm sure it'll be nice enough. But with these cost overruns I can see them cutting back on details.

 

Here in lovely Manch-Vegas NH they built a ball park for the AA Blue Jays team the Fishercats in 2005. The original plan was for brick facades like Fenway Park. Very nice. But when costs went up we got corrugated metal siding instead.

 

Still a very nice ball park. I think it's a better design than Sahlen Field, with open concourses that allow you to see the game while at concessions. But corrugated metal siding is not brick.

Expand  

I think this is pretty much the reason why we don’t have any fly-through or detailed renderings of the interior like we’ve seen with other stadium projects. I don’t think they want us seeing anything or getting our hopes up if costs skyrocket and they start cutting things. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 5:37 PM, SoCal Deek said:

but I'm wondering what exactly you were expecting.

Expand  


When Pegula originally came in with all the bravado (ie: "If I want to make some money, I'll go drill a gas well"), I had the impression that he would be going all-out, even if that meant he would have to pull a substantial amount from his own pocket.
 

  On 5/2/2024 at 5:37 PM, SoCal Deek said:

Is it not better than the 'recently' constructed open air stadiums in the surrounding NE area of the country (Chicago, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Cincinnati, New York, New England, Philadelphia....to name more than a few)?

Expand  


I do expect our stadium to be on the same level or slightly better than the stadiums you listed. But you just named stadiums that are 20+ years old. Chicago's stadium is 101 years old and last underwent refurbishment in 2003. Steelers stadium is 23 years old. Browns stadium is 25 years old. Bengals stadium is 24 years old. Patriots stadium is 22 years old. Eagles stadium is 21 years old.

I mentioned before that I see this brand new stadium akin to the stadiums that were built 20-25 years ago. Which isn't ideal for a brand new stadium. It is like spending $50k on a new kitchen and installing shag carpeting and red cabinets.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 5/2/2024 at 3:28 PM, PromoTheRobot said:

I'm sure it'll be nice enough. But with these cost overruns I can see them cutting back on details.

 

Here in lovely Manch-Vegas NH they built a ball park for the AA Blue Jays team the Fishercats in 2005. The original plan was for brick facades like Fenway Park. Very nice. But when costs went up we got corrugated metal siding instead.

 

Still a very nice ball park. I think it's a better design than Sahlen Field, with open concourses that allow you to see the game while at concessions. But corrugated metal siding is not brick.

Expand  

 

Off topic, but Sahlen Field/Pilot Field is vastly overrated at this point.  It was ground-breaking in 1988.  However, it is not a good design with today's standards.  It needs to be about 5-6K seats smaller, needs to have open concourses and a better standing/socialization scene.  It also has a terrible backdrop.  The concourses are like a concrete tomb.  If you are there with a large crowd on a hot day, the concession lines clog up the concourse every 40 feet or so, and it is about 25 degrees hotter in there than anywhere else.

 

The sitelines are also gunked up there as you go down foul territory.  The seats face the outfield much more than current designs and in the case of a full/large crowd, you need to look across a lot of people sideways to see the infield.   All the newer AAA and AA ballparks have passed it by.  The Jays' renovations during covid put a decent coat of paint on the insides, and improved the lighting, but without that, the ballpark would be in much worse decay. 

 

People locally still talk about it like it is the Minor League's crown jewel.  It is now the 2nd oldest park in AAA, oldest in the International league, and it is dusted by places like Columbus, Indianapolis, Nashville, Charlotte, etc.

Edited by May Day 10
  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 2:33 AM, mrags said:

I just saw a bunch of renderings for it on FB. They did it like Gillette. Built a whole city center around it. Hotels, shopping, restaurants. You know, like how we should have built ours. Oh well 

Expand  

I don't get how Terry could have screwed this up so badly. Build around it, put a dome or a retractable roof and you can have tons of events in there. We could have held the Draft, a Superbowl etc. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 6:38 PM, May Day 10 said:

 

Off topic, but Sahlen Field/Pilot Field is vastly overrated at this point.  It was ground-breaking in 1988.  However, it is not a good design with today's standards.  It needs to be about 8K seats smaller, needs to have open concourses and a better standing/socialization scene.  It also has a terrible backdrop.  The concourses are like a concrete tomb.  If you are there with a large crowd on a hot day, the concession lines clog up the concourse every 40 feet or so, and it is about 25 degrees hotter in there than anywhere else.

 

The sitelines are also gunked up there as you go down foul territory.  The seats face the outfield much more than current designs and in the case of a full/large crowd, you need to look across a lot of people sideways to see the infield.   All the newer AAA and AA ballparks have passed it by.  The Jays' renovations during covid put a decent coat of paint on the insides, and improved the lighting, but without that, the ballpark would be in much worse decay. 

Expand  

 

This is Northeast Delta Dental Stadium. Capacity 6500 but can hold 9000 with standing room. There's the Sam Adams Club in left field where you can have dinner while watching the game. And there's a Hilton Garden Hotel in center field with its own patio restaurant.

 

https://www.stadiumjourney.com/stadiums/northeast-delta-dental-stadium-s273

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 6:42 PM, SoonerBillsFan said:

I don't get how Terry could have screwed this up so badly. Build around it, put a dome or a retractable roof and you can have tons of events in there. We could have held the Draft, a Superbowl etc. 

Expand  

I don't love the new stadium by any means but disagree with a couple points here.  I think Buffalo can still end up hosting the draft once the new stadium opens and we were never getting a Superbowl here no matter what.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 5/2/2024 at 6:18 PM, Einstein said:


When Pegula originally came in with all the bravado (ie: "If I want to make some money, I'll go drill a gas well"), I had the impression that he would be going all-out, even if that meant he would have to pull a substantial amount from his own pocket.
 


I do expect our stadium to be on the same level or slightly better than the stadiums you listed. But you just named stadiums that are 20+ years old. Chicago's stadium is 101 years old and last underwent refurbishment in 2003. Steelers stadium is 23 years old. Browns stadium is 25 years old. Bengals stadium is 24 years old. Patriots stadium is 22 years old. Eagles stadium is 21 years old.

I mentioned before that I see this brand new stadium akin to the stadiums that were built 20-25 years ago. Which isn't ideal for a brand new stadium. It is like spending $50k on a new kitchen and installing shag carpeting and red cabinets.

Expand  

No idea what you’re talking about. Steel and concrete haven’t changed much in the last century. What has changed are the fan experience amenities in the latest stadiums. I can pretty much guarantee you that the new Bills Stadium will have modern amenities. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...