Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

That depends upon the definition of "regular season playing time."  Two plays each game technically qualifies.  

 

Otherwise, sure, offline I'd be more than happy to consider it depending that definition.  

 

All I said was that he won't make any significant impact.  I never said he won't play if he's on the team.  

 

So define that and let's talk offline.  If it works out I'll donate my winnings to charity in your name.  Would be good either way, a win-win for you.  :) 

 

 

 

In your first post you said "I don't see him making the final roster."

 

I said that he's going to get "regular season playing time" with the Bills. If you don't think he's going to make the final roster this is a pretty easy bet for you to make.

 

BTW I'm not interested in parsing words if that's the direction your heading towards.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

Bizarre. I sort of liked who they were riding with before. Too crowded. 

I’m thinking the Brass wanted a veteran presence in the RB room. May not see him in September..

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

 

right….. like I had in other posts.  

 

Okay. It's just odd saying that he's "the odd man out" when he's not even on the roster..

 

If you said "he's not returning" that would make more sense to me.

 

Whatever. I understand.

Posted
1 minute ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

Okay. It's just odd saying that he's "the odd man out" when he's not even on the roster..

 

If you said "he's not returning" that would make more sense to me.

 

Whatever. I understand.

Right…. just like saying he was the odd man out last year, as he was a free agent….we knew there was a chance he’d be back. Then they brought him back. And if these kids don’t pan out and can’t do the job, he’ll likely be back again if he’s available.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Paup 1995MVP said:

The lack of use of Yeldon really burned me up.  He had game.  Came out of Bama and was a 2nd round draft pick of the Jags in 2015.  He had a little burst and had good hands.  He wasn't a star, but was an NFL RB.  And after one fumble against the Pats, he almost never saw the field again.  


And yet, when the Bills moved on from him in 2020 at age 28, no other team signed him

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Sierra Foothills said:

 

In your first post you said "I don't see him making the final roster."

 

I said that he's going to get "regular season playing time" with the Bills. If you don't think he's going to make the final roster this is a pretty easy bet for you to make.

 

BTW I'm not interested in parsing words if that's the direction your heading towards.

 

I don't see him making the final roster.  I'm considering a variety of factors that I haven't provided the background for.  

 

As I also said, he doesn't add anything that we don't already have.  He doesn't, and he's not going to be improving.  He's 33.  Anyone that's watched the NFL for any length of time and paid attention knows that 33-year old (or older RBs) typically don't do much.  You know that.  I'm sure that there are exceptions that you can find, but generally that's the case, even for the best RBs.  

 

Here are last season's leaders, and do it for any season.  Sort on age and look at the RB production.  Murray was by a country mile the only one older than 31 that did anything, and the 31-year old was Cordorelle Patterson, a converted WR to RB.  If he makes any kind of a difference this season at 33, it'll be an exception and against the odds.  It seems to me that we could do something greater with that roster spot.  

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2022/rushing.htm#rushing_and_receiving::rush_yds 

 

He obviously wouldn't be used with any frequency as a receiver OOTB, so that's not really a role for him given that we barely used two RBs that specialize in that for that purpose last season.  Remember, Beane brought Hines on for that expressed purpose, and he's an outstanding receiver OOTB.  He had 5 catches after we got him.  We were all scratching our noggins over that.  Cook, another RB with great hands, averaged just over 1/game.  Likewise, that was one of the things touted about him when we drafted him.  So that's not why they signed him.  

 

As to rushing, we drafted Cook to be our speed back, Harris is now there to be our 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust guy and at the forefront of his prime.  So that's not Murray's role either.  So whatever he does it'll be either for injury or depth.  That doesn't spell significant playing time.  So that's why I asked what your definition of "regular season playing time" was.  If all he's going to do is carry the ball on average once a game and be in on a number of snaps otherwise, sure, I suppose that's "regular season playing time," but that would then also fully corroborate my position that this is a nothing signing, wouldn't it?  

 

I could be way off, maybe he'll end up being our starter, but knowing what we know about RBs out of their prime, I'd guess that's not going to be the case.  

 

As to parsing, you're the one that made the offer based upon "regular season playing time," which could mean anything, not on whether or not he makes the roster, which I have zero control over.  Duke Johnson "got regular season playing time" last season.  Just sayin'.  Given our personnel management it wouldn't surprise me if he did, I'm simply not expecting it.  There are a bunch of players now that we've signed or possibly even drafted that won't be on the 53.  That's normal.  

 

Let's make a friendly then.  See what happens.  I don't care if I lose the wager, all the better if it improves the team.  I just don't see him doing much if he does make the roster.  And if he was really that good some team would have picked him up by now.  

 

Go Bills!!  

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

Personally, I thought he looked much bigger, stronger and faster than Motor. He also does not fumble. 

 

Hmm.  I'm not seeing a significant difference other than size.  Maybe my estimation of Motor is higher than yours rather than my evaluation of Murray being lower.  But I see you've got some folks agreeing with you so I'll keep an open mind and relook at Murray more closely.

 

I would agree that Harris is "bigger, stronger and faster."  At least he seemed to be all those things in his games against the Bills.  

Posted

This explains last season and why Hines wasn't used that much as a HB. They see Hines as a special teams star and now have Cook, Harris and Murray slotted in the HB positions. It's brilliant because it puts less mileage on our HBs and gives us flexibility.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, newcam2012 said:

A lot of assumptions here. It's really yet to be be seen how effective the oline will be. Will Brown improve? Torrance is a rookie. Kincaid offers little in the blocking department. 

 

Make no mistake about it the Bills are no power running team nor do they want to be. They will always live and die with Allen's arm and legs. 

 

Lastly, will Dorsey commit to the run? Will Harris still healthy? Will they use Hines as RB? How will Cook progress or will he regress? 

 

The Bills are not a power-running team, as you say.  But it's great to have powerful backs on a passing team going up against nickel and dime defenses.  

 

I'm not sure how good this OL will be, but I do think it's realistic to expect it to be better than v.2022.  

 

7 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

Hmm.  I'm not seeing a significant difference other than size.  Maybe my estimation of Motor is higher than yours rather than my evaluation of Murray being lower.  But I see you've got some folks agreeing with you so I'll keep an open mind and relook at Murray more closely.

 

I would agree that Harris is "bigger, stronger and faster."  At least he seemed to be all those things in his games against the Bills.  

 

Beane said that Hines didn't have time to learn the offense last year.  He seemed to be suggesting that we'll see more of him in the backfield this year.  With Hines' catching-out-of-the-backfield skills, we ought to.  

 

Edited by hondo in seattle
  • Agree 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

I don't see him making the final roster.  I'm considering a variety of factors that I haven't provided the background for.  

 

As I also said, he doesn't add anything that we don't already have.  He doesn't, and he's not going to be improving.  He's 33.  Anyone that's watched the NFL for any length of time and paid attention knows that 33-year old (or older RBs) typically don't do much.  You know that.  I'm sure that there are exceptions that you can find, but generally that's the case, even for the best RBs.  

 

Here are last season's leaders, and do it for any season.  Sort on age and look at the RB production.  Murray was by a country mile the only one older than 31 that did anything, and the 31-year old was Cordorelle Patterson, a converted WR to RB.  If he makes any kind of a difference this season at 33, it'll be an exception and against the odds.  It seems to me that we could do something greater with that roster spot.  

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2022/rushing.htm#rushing_and_receiving::rush_yds 

 

He obviously wouldn't be used with any frequency as a receiver OOTB, so that's not really a role for him given that we barely used two RBs that specialize in that for that purpose last season.  Remember, Beane brought Hines on for that expressed purpose, and he's an outstanding receiver OOTB.  He had 5 catches after we got him.  We were all scratching our noggins over that.  Cook, another RB with great hands, averaged just over 1/game.  Likewise, that was one of the things touted about him when we drafted him.  So that's not why they signed him.  

 

As to rushing, we drafted Cook to be our speed back, Harris is now there to be our 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust guy and at the forefront of his prime.  So that's not Murray's role either.  So whatever he does it'll be either for injury or depth.  That doesn't spell significant playing time.  So that's why I asked what your definition of "regular season playing time" was.  If all he's going to do is carry the ball on average once a game and be in on a number of snaps otherwise, sure, I suppose that's "regular season playing time," but that would then also fully corroborate my position that this is a nothing signing, wouldn't it?  

 

I could be way off, maybe he'll end up being our starter, but knowing what we know about RBs out of their prime, I'd guess that's not going to be the case.  

 

As to parsing, you're the one that made the offer based upon "regular season playing time," which could mean anything, not on whether or not he makes the roster, which I have zero control over.  Duke Johnson "got regular season playing time" last season.  Just sayin'.  Given our personnel management it wouldn't surprise me if he did, I'm simply not expecting it.  There are a bunch of players now that we've signed or possibly even drafted that won't be on the 53.  That's normal.  

 

Let's make a friendly then.  See what happens.  I don't care if I lose the wager, all the better if it improves the team.  I just don't see him doing much if he does make the roster.  And if he was really that good some team would have picked him up by now.  

 

Go Bills!!  

 

 

 

Fair enough.

 

I'll say barring injury he makes the opening day roster.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:

 

The Bills are not a power-running team, as you say.  But it's great to have powerful backs on a passing team going up against nickel and dime defenses.  

 

I'm not sure how good this OL will be, but I do think it's realistic to expect it to be better than v.2022.  

 

 

 

You’re right that power running isn’t their primary option, but it’s clear that the additions of Harris, Torrence and now Murray suggest they’re headed in the power running direction when they do choose to run. Which, as you suggest, might be a really smart counter punch against defenses that’ll be expecting pass first. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Dillenger4 said:

I think it's clear that the Front Office is sick of seeing our offense not being able to gain a 3rd &1 or 3rd &2 on the ground, easily. We tried sooo many times last year with twinkle toes Singletary. He couldn't get an inch.

We rely on going for it on 4th down, using Allen or passing and holding our breath. This is NOT sustainable.

We now have two bigger pounding backs in Harris and Murray.

Goaline situations. 3rd and short situations are now much easier and the line should be better for it all too.

Late in teh season is when you run. Everyone did it to us. Now we can control drives.

 

With all due respect, I disagree with this.  In 2020, 2021, and early 2022, they were terrible in 3rd and 4th and less-than-2 yards.  It was mostly Moss running into the line and going nowhere.  Last year, once Moss was out of the mix, Singletary actually did quite well in those situations.  I don't have statistics to cite, but I watched every snap of every game and was pleasantly surprised to see what had been a major issue become a non-issue.  This isn't to say that Singletary is a power back or a short-yardage ace, but once he took over that role, he was pretty solid in getting those first downs on 3rd and 4th and short.  I'm curious to know if I'm the only one on this board who noticed this improvement.

 

I should also add that, in the same vein, when the Bills ran the ball last season and committed to it/stuck with it, they were quite effective.  Singletary ran well and later in the season, Cook found his stride and ran well too (he was bad in the beginning of the season).  That said, it was pretty rare that they actually did commit to it and/or stuck to it.

 

I do agree that with Harris, Murray, the new guards, and Brown at full health, they should be even better at 3rd and 4th and short in the upcoming season.  Likewise, if they commit to the run game, I think it will be even better than last season.  And to clarify, I'm referring to the RUNNING BACK run game and not the Josh Allen run game.  Allen running the ball is quite effective, but I don't want to steer the conversation into the whole exposure to injury thing - that's another topic for another thread (and there are already many of those).

Edited by msw2112
Posted
7 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

Bizarre. I sort of liked who they were riding with before. Too crowded. 


I think Sal is right.  It may be a game specific signing against teams where we need tough yards at 3rd and 1, 4th and 1, and goal line.  With not playing much, he’ll be completely rested and he’s not frank gore.  He just turned 33.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I can’t really understand why so many here are questioning this and don’t think he will make the roster. The bills have always carried 4 rbs and rb on the roster I don’t see why this year would be any different. I know Jones only played special teams but now you have a special team guy in Hines who can also play on offense. 
 

I think it’s much more likely we carry Murray on the roster than a 7th wr or even Quentin Morris as a 3rd TE

  • Agree 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, 1st&ten said:

Bills are going to surprise the league & run the wishbone.


we could do this in the redzone seriously at the very Murray and Harris are both together as very strong goal line options 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Murray replaces Duke Johnson. His ceiling is that Matt Breida, TJ Yeldon role. 4th RB on the 53 who is inactive on Game Day unless there's an injury to Cook, Harris, or Hines.

 

His floor is he's on the Practice Squad. Which was what he was doing last season. 

 

But make no mistake about it, he's inactive unless there's an injury. McDermott doesn't dress 4 RB's. And he won't dress over Cook, Harris, or Hines.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...