2023 NFL Draft - Day 1 Debrief

[gonzo1105]

2 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

 

I would love to get Bergeron, but trading up is the only way to do that.  No way he's falling that far when he's the best OT left.  I'm not OK with Spencer Brown there and I hope the FO isn't either.

 

We already traded away the 4th round pick so we don't have much to work with unless Beane is willing to dip into next year's as well.

it’s way more likely that Beane drops down from 59 to recoup that pick or 2 than trade up again. He’s basically reliving what he did last year. If the Bills move from 59 to 70 they recoup their 4th rounder back but they might only want to move down to like 65 or so which would get a 5 and a 6 

[NewEra]

Great work as always.  
 

I agree with everything you said.  
 

the one thing I’ll pick out is the example of the ravens putting Hamilton on him.  I feel the ravens and chargers are currently the only teams that can do that.  He’s a matchup nightmare for almost everyone else.  
 

Random note- maybe we can get Swift for a 6th?  🤣 

 

Gibbs is going to be a star in that offense, but LOL @ that lions draft.  

[Billz4ever]

5 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

it’s way more likely that Beane drops down from 59 to recoup that pick or 2 than trade up again. He’s basically reliving what he did last year. If the Bills move from 59 to 70 they recoup their 4th rounder back but they might only want to move down to like 65 or so which would get a 5 and a 6 

 

I would hope Beane is more worried about solidifying the OL rather than worrying about later round picks.  We got Allen a new weapon, now we have to make sure the protection is there.  I don't think Brown is the answer.

Edited April 28, 2023 by Billz4ever

[pennstate10]

Excellent review Gunner. 
I think your work is better than some of the people who do this for a living (McShay and Graham for 2). 
 

I agree that a safety like Hamilton could take Kincaid one on one. For most plays. But not every play. Also, that’s taking a #14 to neutralize a #25 pick. So you can look at it as Kincaid neutralizing Hamilton. 

[gonzo1105]

Just now, Billz4ever said:

 

I would hope Beane is more worried about solidifying the OL rather than worrying about later round picks.  We got Allen anew weapon, now we have to make sure the protection is there.  I don't think Brown is the answer there.

My prediction is that all the OL that people are hankering for will be off the board before 59. Best on the board at 59 are Dawand Jones and Blake Freeland and I don’t think Buffalo would be interested in either. I finished round 2 but haven’t started round 3. I’ll post it when I get done today 

[hondo in seattle]

33 minutes ago, ngbills said:

To be a lions fan. Two top 20 picks and they get a RB and LB. 

 

Devil's advocate...

 

I get the positional value argument.  But let's say both these guys turn out to be perennial all-pros and future HOFers.  

 

No All-Pro pick is a bad pick, regardless of position.  

 

Edited April 28, 2023 by hondo in seattle

[Beck Water]

3 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

Excellent stuff Gunner!  This was the only interesting draft in years.

 

Kincaid isn't Pitts, but Pitts is unique, so no knock there.  Kincaid is as good an athlete as Knox, with better hands.  This Offense has serious potential in a way it hadn't before.  They needed a playmaker on O and they got one.  Boom.

 

Biggest shock was Gonzalez dropping to 17.  NE actually moved down, picked up a 4th....and still got the best CB in the draft.

 

I wasn't shocked by the RBs taken in top 12.

 

 

 

Is anyone else concerned that he missed the Rose Bowl and didn't complete the athletic tests at either the combine or his pro day due to a "back injury"?

[Chaos]

3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Big Board Check

So after all that what is left as we head into day two? Here is the top 15 best available by my big board:

 

1. Joey Porter Jnr, CB, Penn State

2. Brian Branch, S, Alabama

3. Trenton Simpson, LB, Clemson

4. Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee

5. Drew Sanders, LB, Arkansas

6. Antonio Johnson, S, Texas A&M

7. Michael Mayer, TE, Notre Dame

8. Clark Phillips III, CB, Utah

9. John Michael Schmitz, IOL, Minnesota

10. Cam Smith, CB, South Carolina

11. O'Cyrus Torrence, IOL, Florida

12. Josh Downs, WR, UNC

13. Matthew Bergeron, OT, Syracuse

14. Hendon Hooker, QB, Tennessee

15. Keion White, DE, Georgia Tech

I would put Joe Tippman in that list. I would probably take Downs out of list. If Tippmann and Begeron were both available, I would rank Tippman higher.  In terms of guessing the Bills pick, I think between Tippman and Begeron, I would expect Tippman, 1) I think he is the better prospect and 2) the public commitment to Spencer Brown. 3) Morse has a much higher injury risk than the average NFL player, and Tippman would seem to be better than any option at that spot.  I would expect Tippman to beat out Ryan Bates for the starting guard spot. 

[gonzo1105]

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Is anyone else concerned that he missed the Rose Bowl and didn't complete the athletic tests at either the combine or his pro day due to a "back injury"?

A lot of top guys don’t participate in the bowls anymore so no. He had an injury , he was cleared by multiple doctors. I don’t need to see him test, you can see it on his film 

[GunnerBill]

1 minute ago, Chaos said:

I would put Joe Tippman in that list. I would probably take Downs out of list. If Tippmann and Begeron were both available, I would rank Tippman higher.  In terms of guessing the Bills pick, I think between Tippman and Begeron, I would expect Tippman, 1) I think he is the better prospect and 2) the public commitment to Spencer Brown. 3) Morse has a much higher injury risk than the average NFL player, and Tippman would seem to be better than any option at that spot.  I would expect Tippman to beat out Ryan Bates for the starting guard spot. 

 

Yea that list isn't Bills specific. That is by my overall grades. Tippman is my 22nd BPA.

[Beck Water]

2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

A lot of top guys don’t participate in the bowls anymore so no. He had an injury , he was cleared by multiple doctors. I don’t need to see him test, you can see it on his film 

 

OK, not worried so much about missing the bowls, but not testing at either day seems a bit troubling.

Regarding cleared by multiple doctors - Just saying the Bills have been burnt by this in the past.  We'll hope it's different now.

Edited April 28, 2023 by Beck Water

[GunnerBill]

59 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

I don't think he gets open a lot.  3 of his targets resulted in INTs. Some of that may be on Josh, but Knox's int number and % are second highest of the top 4 receivers on the team. 

 

He does. Dorsey and Josh are the reason Knox's numbers are not higher. Where they do target him - in the redzone - he is a top 5 performing tight end over the past 2 seasons by almost any metric. He was criminally under used by the Bills last year. And McDermott felt so too is my very strong suspicion. They worked it out a little down the stretch but there were parts of the season where it was like our OC forgot we had a tight end out there.

[HappyDays]

23 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Is anyone else concerned that he missed the Rose Bowl and didn't complete the athletic tests at either the combine or his pro day due to a "back injury"?

 

Kyle Trimble of Banged Up Bills has no concerns:

 

And this was reported a couple weeks ago:

 

The Bills have never taken medical risks in the 1st round under Beane. I'm sure they did their due diligence.

[Alphadawg7]

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I absolutely loved that first round! It was bonkers, it was crazy, there were trades all over the place and there was a nice balance between the things that felt true in January (Young and Stroud 1&2, Will Anderson being the first non-QB, the Titans being all in on offensive line, Nolan Smith being a late 1st) and the things that have been trendier as we have gone through the process (Emmanuel Forbes going high, the receiver run not starting until later, Darnell Wright being a top 10 pick)!!  So here are my thoughts on where that leaves us with day 1 in the books.

 

Totally agree, that was maybe the most entertaining first round (or any round) I can remember watching.  Not only was it hard to know where anyone might go, you had trades flying left and right.  If I am not mistaken I think there were 5 trades inside the top 10 even.  

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The Bills Pick

In what felt very much like a repeat of last year Brandon Beane flipped his 4th round pick to move up a few spots in the latter portion of round 1 to make sure he snagged a guy who was high on his board before the drop off in talent hit. Beane confirmed in the press conference last night that the Bills did not have first round grades on all four of the receivers that went in that crazy run from pick 20 to pick 23, however I still believe that there were at least a couple of guys in that run that they would have coveted at #27. Once all 4 were gone he started calling up - the Giants and Jacksonville - to get ahead of the Cowboys for Dalton Kincaid. So what I like about the pick and the process is it says to me that there was an absolute commitment to getting a weapon for Josh Allen. The AFC is an arms race right now. The Bengals have great weapons, the Chargers just added a dynamic element to their offensive skill positions, the Ravens have suddenly gone from a weak set of weapons to a potentially nice looking combination. The Bills have got to make sure they keep up and their focus was clearly on adding an offensive playmaker. Kincaid was the 18th overall player on my big board and by the time the Bills picked he was the 5th best remaining and the best remaining offensive player.

 

As for Kincaid himself, I think he does shift the paradigm and said so in another thread recently. This is a guy you can put on the field with Dawson Knox and create a bunch of different mismatches. He essentially is your Cole Beasley replacement in a different body type. He is a "big slot" more than a true tight end. He runs really good routes for a tight end, he has very good hands and Brandon Beane talked about his "feel" for coverages being Beasley-esque and I see where he was going with that. I was not a fan of any of the other tight ends at this spot for the Bills because they were less athletic versions of Dawson Knox and I thought taking a slot receiver off the field to put say Michael Mayer out there made us less dynamic, not more. I don't feel that way about Kincaid. He adds a completely new dynamic to the offense and working out if you play the Bills 12 personnel in base or nickel is going to be a constant challenge for defensive coordinators. I also think personality wise... he feels like a kid who will get on great with Josh, and get on great with Dawson. 

 

Okay, so what do I like less about the pick. Positional value is still positional value and while Kincaid is more of a big slot than he is a true tight end he isn't a Kyle Pitts level receiver coming out at the position and you are still spending a first round pick on a slot guy. I care a bit less about it in this draft than I would normally given the weakness at the top of the class, but would be remiss of me not to mention it. Secondly, he is 23, will turn 24 in October and by the end of his 5 year rookie deal will be 29. Again, in this class because of covid and additional eligibility there are a lot of older prospects. But the reality is he is likely a one contract guy unless he really turns into one of the elite weapons in the league at the position. In terms of weaknesses in his game... he can't really block. Beane skirted around it a bit in the presser and said it without saying it but his blocking consists of "can he get in the way and just hold a guy up for half a second." That is less of a problem for the Bills if their plan is lots of 12 personnel with Knox but say Dawson misses time your choice then is try and ask Kincaid to play as your traditional tight end and go with a slot receiver or, more likely, bring out Gilliam, an extra blocker or a blocking tight end who offers nothing as a pass catcher and in those situations you are definitely reducing the dynamism of your offense. I also thing he can be bullied a touch when you get a really physical player against him in coverage. There were not many that could compete in that regard in the PAC 12 but there will be some of them in the NFL. If I was Baltimore for instance I'd say to Kyle Hamilton - just go plan man on Kincaid, get physical and we will play 10 v 10 elsewhere. None of the above should be seen as me hammering the pick, I understand it and I think given where the board was at it was one of the better potential outcomes. But it is right to show both sides. 

 

He becomes only the second player on our offense drafted in the first round. So at least in that regard Josh won't be a club of 1 anymore! The challenge now is on Josh and Ken Dorsey to find a way to utilise our two tight ends to maximise their ability. No good crying about weapons you don't have. In Diggs, Knox and now Kincaid they have three guys who you can really create with. And if they can't it is on them. For Ken Dorsey in particular failure with this group now and spells of the season where "run Josh Allen" seems to be our only offense should leave him out of a job next January. 

 

I very much agree with your whole write up here.  its no secret that I was both skeptical we would go TE round 1 unless the board fell in a way where it was the clear BPA, and that it did.  So not only did I expect it to be Kincaid at that point, I felt it was the correct choice.  Heading into the draft, I really wasn't excited about the idea of having such a heavy investment into the TE position given what we pay Knox and then an additional first round pick (now a 1st and 4th), especially given I did not have a lot of confidence in Dorsey getting the kind of production from a 2nd TE.  However, that was also mostly because I never imagined Kincaid making it to our pick (and technically he didn't as I think it was pretty obvious he was going to Dallas and why we moved up) and we would have likely taken either Mayer or Washington who are much more of a typical TE than Kincaid who is more of a WR in a TE sized body.  So I was more interested pre-draft in getting a receiver type like LaPorta in round 2 or one of the other guys in the round 3 or 4.  

 

That being said, I am pretty excited about Kincaid given I am less worried now about his targets being too low given he is that more WR type and Beane made it clear that is what he was drafted to be.  So now I can feel better about him being a relevant part of our offense, although I still need to see Dorsey make it happen on the field.  One of my biggest criticisms with Dorsey last year was not doing a good job of utilizing the talents and skill sets of what was already on the roster.  We brought in both Cook and Hines to be big receiving threats, and yet they were just used that way (Hines wasn't used at all).  With struggles at slot, I thought he could have done a better job of trying to get Shakir more involved.  And Knox I felt there should have bene more emphasis to get Knox more targets, especially given the inconsistency from Davis and the slot position.  

 

But it was Dorseys first year, so the good news is that it should be better this year and now that we used a first on Kincaid, there will be pressure to be sure he gets the kind involved.  

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

My Mock

I matched my personal best from last year by correctly mocking 27 of the eventual first rounders (and given that this was 27/31 and not 27/32 I think it probably counts as a new PB!) The guys I missed on were Quentin Johnston and Mazi Smith (both of whom I knew were very possible 1sts I just couldn't find a slot for) plus Jack Campbell (shocker to me) and Felix Anudike-Uzomah who I actually had at #31 to the Chiefs in version 2.0 before swapping out for McDonald in the final version.

 

I also had 6 exact player and team matches (not all at the exact spots given some of the trade activity). That was up from 4 last year and in an unpredictable 1st round I am pretty happy with that. There were then a further 6 right position, wrong player (which is a tick down on my average of about 8 there) and 6 where I missed a player's exact draft slot (not the team but the position) by one.... including literally just having Myles Murphy and Bryan Bresee to the Saints and Bengals the wrong way round. 

 

I will score it by the Fantasy Pros mock methodology later too. Which seems to be the most respect of the scoring formulas people use for mocks these days. 

 

Nice job, this year was quite difficult I will say.  I didn't put as much time in with all the baby prep, so definitely enjoyed your wealth of info to help fill some gaps in.  

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Player(s) I was high on...

I have two of my 11 first round grades still on the board in Joey Porter Jnr and Brian Branch. Branch surprises me less because he is a safety (I know he played some corner in college too but I'm not sure that will work in the NFL) and positional value comes into play but I am really surprised by Porter sliding. To an extent I get Forbes (ball skills) and Banks (potential) jumping him but if you asked me which corner in this class has the best pure coverage skillset to go play in an NFL game tomorrow it is Porter. I wonder if the Steelers complete the family fairytale by drafting him with the first pick on day 2 and letting him follow in his father's footsteps? That would be one hell of a story. 

 

Joey Porter Jr was my biggest surprise, I thought he was a lock in the first, especially given how some of the other positions were not overly strong in the first.  I also figured Branch would go in the first, but wasn't as confident in him going there as I was in Porter.  I expect both of these guys to go real fast in the 2nd round.  

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Player I was down on...

I was kind of surprised that there were no major reaches down the board. There were no "John Schneider moments" in the days when the Seahwaks would draft late in the first and pick a 3rd round prospect. Nor was there a Cole Strange moment. Belichick actually got the 4th best player in the draft my board at pick #17, and screwed the Jets and Rodgers in the process. The two lowest graded players by my board to get selected last night were the two Smiths - Mazi and Nolan - who are both later 2nds on my board. I know I am lower than most on Nolan Smith but his tape screams athlete who still needs to learn to play football to me. That said, the value and the fit in Philly where he can play just as a situational pass rusher his first couple of years while they try and develop him further makes some sense. 

 

Agree on this too...except I would say no "Raider moments" ha.  That being said, the one big "reach" for me was Gibbs to Detroit at 12.  I thought Gibbs would go round 1, and even thought he was in play for the Lions.  But I figured if he went to Detroit it would have been at 18 instead of 12.  I wasn't surprised Bijan went at 8, Falcons were a popular landing spot for him leading up to the draft and its what I expected.  But didn't think Gibbs would go top 15 too.  

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Biggest shock of the night

I think just the trade action early. I actually like the eventual outcome for both Houston and Arizona. Houston got a Quarterback, and it got one of the two true blue chippers in this class without ruining their 2024 draft. I would not have been in favour of giving up a 2024 first if it was their only one, or if they had spent it on anyone other than Carter or Anderson. But all they have essentially done is punted their "spare" first rounder forward a year to try and kick start the Demeco Ryans era now. And I think that makes sense. They have been waiting to try and re-start the franchise for two years. It was time for them to put some actual effort into it. And for Arizona originally I thought it was a bad move. Despite picking up an extra first this is a team with multiple needs and they moved back so far that they risked being out of even the second tier of prospects. I really like Paris Johnson Jnr. He was my #5 overall player. I think when you look at the success of Charles Cross last year in Seattle you have to be looking for these quick footed pass protecting left tackles these days in the top 10 rather than the old bulldozer stereotype. In terms of a single pick I didn't see anyone who had John Schneider and Pete Carrol going with Devon Witherspoon. I like it, I understand it, well played fellas.  

 

Agreed, the amount of trades (I think 5 in the top 10) was even more than I thought.  I think all the trades feel like win-wins too inside that top 10.  Of course how players pan out will truly determine that, but I think all the teams did well for what their teams needed to do with those trades.

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Worst Pick

Worst single pick is the Chicago Bears taking a right tackle only - who we KNOW is a right tackle only because he tried and failed to be a left tackle in college - at 10th overall. That is horrific value. A top 10 pick on a right tackle who is a better run blocker than pass protector and to be honest who I don't see any real special traits in. Even if he hits, what good is it if Justin Fields who isn't the fastest processor in the world is being buried from the blindside every time he drops back to pass. They spent a high 2nd round pick on Teven Jenkins, another overhyped college right tackle, just two sodding years ago. They have tried him at left tackle, right tackle and both guard spots since to try and rescue some value from that pick. Remember folks insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting better results. That franchise has been a trainwreck for a long time now since the days when Jerry Angelo and Lovie Smith at least gave it some level of respectability in the 00s. 

 

While I'm on a roll ragging on the NFC North a word for the Lions. To this point I have been a fan of the job Brad Holmes has done as GM rebuilding that team. They have picked the best football players and have focused on premium positions - left tackle, edge rusher, wide receiver. But It was @BADOLBILZ who was saying the other day in the context of the Bills that is kind of easier to stick to that rule of thumb when you don't feel you are close. Once you feel you are close there can be a tendency to start looking at your roster and attacking those "needs" you have to get you over the top. Having the 12th and 18th picks in the NFL draft and coming away with a running back and an off the ball middle linebacker is just bad draft strategy in the modern NFL. The 1990s just called in Detroit. They want their draft back. I don't hate Campbell or Gibbs as players, but I hate it as an approach to team building in 2023. 

 

Yeah, I was pretty surprised by this pick by the Bears, not at all who I thought they would take.  And for the Lions, I had Campbell as a Lions pick, just thought it would be the 2nd round based on many thinking Campbell would slide there.  Jack Campbell feels like a Dan Campbell guy all the way, so wasn't surprised they took him.  And I am not as down on Jack as many are here, so I don't hate the pick at 18 if that is they guy they coveted.  But I do think Gibbs at 12 was a mistake and should have gone another direction there and then taken Gibbs at 18 instead of Gibbs - Campbell.

 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Big Board Check

So after all that what is left as we head into day two? Here is the top 15 best available by my big board:

 

1. Joey Porter Jnr, CB, Penn State

2. Brian Branch, S, Alabama

3. Trenton Simpson, LB, Clemson

4. Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee

5. Drew Sanders, LB, Arkansas

6. Antonio Johnson, S, Texas A&M

7. Michael Mayer, TE, Notre Dame

8. Clark Phillips III, CB, Utah

9. John Michael Schmitz, IOL, Minnesota

10. Cam Smith, CB, South Carolina

11. O'Cyrus Torrence, IOL, Florida

12. Josh Downs, WR, UNC

13. Matthew Bergeron, OT, Syracuse

14. Hendon Hooker, QB, Tennessee

15. Keion White, DE, Georgia Tech

 

That will do it for the day 1 debrief. Day 2 is normally my favourite day of the draft, so hope everyone enjoys. I will be updating my best remaining list about every 10 picks from now in the Draft live thread as we go along and I'll be back here tomorrow morning to breakdown day 2!!

 

You remaining big board looks solid to me.  Good work as usual Gunner

[Straight Hucklebuck]

For such atrocious WR talent with only 1 or 2 first round grades, 4 went in a row, right around where they were originally projected to go, and I think, several more are going to go today. 

 

Gunner, I wonder what you think of Kincaid verses Musgrave? 

 

Musgrave had the same fluid motion, less production and more serious injury. 

 

Joe Marino always poses the question, how much of Dalton Kincaid, could I have gotten in Luke Musgrave further down? 

 

 

Regardless, I think it's fine. Don't overthink it Bills. Split him out and get him the ball. This shouldn't be a science experiment. 

[Straight Hucklebuck]

The other thing I was watching after the Kincaid pick was do the Cowboys or Bengals take Tight Ends? 

 

Everyone else was available, but when those clubs also passed on Mayer and Washington, it said to me that the Bills read the situation correctly. 

 

They got the highest valued Tight End in the draft. 

 

 

Edited April 28, 2023 by Straight Hucklebuck

[Augie]

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I don't understand the point.... all 4 receivers and Kincaid were all being mocked in the first round. That isn't in dispute.

 

I’m glad you took today off.    😋

[Beck Water]

34 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Kyle Trimble of Banged Up Bills has no concerns:

 

And this was reported a couple weeks ago:

 

The Bills have never taken medical risks in the 1st round under Beane. I'm sure they did their due diligence.

 

Thanks, Days.  Latter led me to this, which has injury info on a number of prospects:

https://fantasyinjuryteam.com/2023/04/11/2023-nfl-draft-injury-concerns/

[Mr. WEO]

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

Is anyone else concerned that he missed the Rose Bowl and didn't complete the athletic tests at either the combine or his pro day due to a "back injury"?

 

Nah.  Guys skip non playoff bowl games now.  He is fully cleared.

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

He does. Dorsey and Josh are the reason Knox's numbers are not higher. Where they do target him - in the redzone - he is a top 5 performing tight end over the past 2 seasons by almost any metric. He was criminally under used by the Bills last year. And McDermott felt so too is my very strong suspicion. They worked it out a little down the stretch but there were parts of the season where it was like our OC forgot we had a tight end out there.

 

He's definitely a red zone target. 

 

TE is always the best friend of a QB under duress, yet Josh rarely tossed his way.  It's hard to believe it was because he was so wide open.

[Beck Water]

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

He does. Dorsey and Josh are the reason Knox's numbers are not higher. Where they do target him - in the redzone - he is a top 5 performing tight end over the past 2 seasons by almost any metric. He was criminally under used by the Bills last year. And McDermott felt so too is my very strong suspicion. They worked it out a little down the stretch but there were parts of the season where it was like our OC forgot we had a tight end out there.

 

Part of it, to my eyes, was the role they had him in.  Yes, he was running routes, but a lot of his routes were chip-and-release short routes - flat, pivot, angle, option return, "sloppy" return or reverse return, whatever ya call it.  Those are the routes Allen historically does NOT want to take, with the exception of throwing to Beasley with whom he'd built that trust.  Josh "got over it" and started to use these to good effect at times in 2021 and early 2022, then regressed mid-to-late last season.  Was Dawson open on those routes?  At times, WIDE open.

 

At other times, I do think Knox still reads the defense wrong, or at least differently than Allen does, and isn't where Allen expects him to be.  I think that was a problem with McKenzie and Shakir as well.

 

What I saw worked out down the stretch, is that Brown played a bit better and needed less help so Knox was free to run more of a route tree.  When he ran deeper routes Allen targeted him sometimes.  He's still (I think) inconsistent in his ability to release against press man - as Cover1 points out, despite the "Rambo" rep he isn't necessarily very physical.

I think Kincaid is different, because I think he'll be used more as a "big slot" than a conventional TE.  So whatever the slot role was supposed to be with Crowder/McKenzie, I think that's where we'll see Kinkaid.

Edited April 28, 2023 by Beck Water