Jump to content

RD 1, Pick 25: TE Dalton Kincaid, Utah


SDS

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Chaos said:

I don't see kindcaid and knox as competing for TE1 at all.  Knox will play TE1 and Kincaid will line up in the slot on 1TE sets.  and kincaid will move over to TE2 in two tight end sets.   Kindcaids flexibiliytin this regard gives him a McCafferty-like confusion to the defense about what the offense is planning. Defense simply can't judge based on personnel in the huddle when you have a guy like that. 

 

This is what I’ve been a hoping for.  More 12 personnel.  Becoming more scheme flexible- more variety- keeping the opposition guessing but never knowing-  

 

He’s a tremendous chess piece and has some of the best hands ever.  While he gets ripped for his blocking as TE- he’s one helluva blocking slot WR.

Edited by NewEra
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I lived in Victor Idaho population like 300 lol
 

They had a chokehold on everything there. If you did not go to their church, you could not get a job they control the schools they control city government police department everything.

 

As far as places out west go, Victor Idaho is one of them. At least there's Grand Teton Brewery and a road that takes you to Broulim's.

 

7 minutes ago, NewEra said:

While he gets ripped for his blocking as TE- he’s one helluva blocking slot WR.

 

He could just stand there and be better than Beasley...

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kincaid is going to make defenses make hard decisions … the offense will now dictate what the defense does 

 

whether he is flexed out wide, in the slot , or in line defenses are going to have to make a decision 

 

do I treat him like a TE and go big? Now potentially letting him run right by   LBrs and out savvy safeties ?

 

or…. Do I treat him like a WR, put another DB on the field … and let him now beat up a 5’11 slot corner in man to man … he will get leverage on most in that spot 

 

a man to man nightmare because defenses need to declare intentions … he is too fast for LBrs, to fluid and savvy for safeties and too big for corners 

 

A++

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

He didn’t have socks on though. What type of person doesn’t wear socks when they meet someone?

 

Rex Ryan???   🤷‍♂️

 

That’s how he hits on you, and why so many people pull a hammy trying to get away. 

  • Angry 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

He didn’t have socks on though. What type of person doesn’t wear socks when they meet someone?

Seriously your worried about THAT? SMH!  He pry didn't have any underwear on either lol

Edited by Mike in Horseheads
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

Now you're saying to the defense, "We may be two TE with a good running back, or we may have Kincaid in the slot or we may be five wide

Put Shorter on the Field instead of Davis, and you can run a 1960's green bay style sweep with Josh playing Paul Hornung. 

2 hours ago, NewEra said:

 While he gets ripped for his blocking as TE- he’s one helluva blocking slot WR.

Bold added by me. The bolded part is a "BINGO"

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

That's interesting and makes sense to me.  Thanks.   Actually, it's better than that, if Cook's on the field with Kincaid.  Now you're saying to the defense, "We may be two TE with a good running back, or we may have Kincaid in the slot or we may be five wide.  Which personnel do you want on the field, and which defense do you want to play?"  And by the way, that's the way Kincaid's presence, if he can be what we think, can be more valuable than just his numbers.   That shows why he doesn't have to be Kelce to be great for the Bills.

 

I really wasn't talking about whether Knox would be 1 or 2 positionally.  I was talking about productivity in the offense, which is where I think Kincaid could surpass Knox.  

 

Man, for the first time I'm getting a sense of how dangerous this offense could be.   Cook and Murray or Harris, with Hines to change the pace.  A veritable fleet of receivers, with Diggs and Davis and the slot guys and who knows, maybe a rookie surprise, Knox and Kincaid.  Josh Allen at the helm, behind a seriously beefed up offensive line.  Tackles have to get the job done, and if all that comes together, that's massive firepower.  

wish we all could see that !
 with O line upgraded enough or even better than enough ?


I do :)

 Here we go again !!

Excited for the Season already

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Seriously your worried about THAT? SMH!  He pry didn't have any underwear on either lol

so you thought about Mike ? You did dint you 

LOL

2 hours ago, Chaos said:

Put Shorter on the Field instead of Davis, and you can run a 1960's green bay style sweep with Josh playing Paul Hornung. 

Bold added by me. The bolded part is a "BINGO"

Wow !

 Nice work there Chaos

and double Bingo

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

Kincaid is going to make defenses make hard decisions … the offense will now dictate what the defense does 

 

whether he is flexed out wide, in the slot , or in line defenses are going to have to make a decision 

 

do I treat him like a TE and go big? Now potentially letting him run right by   LBrs and out savvy safeties ?

 

or…. Do I treat him like a WR, put another DB on the field … and let him now beat up a 5’11 slot corner in man to man … he will get leverage on most in that spot 

 

a man to man nightmare because defenses need to declare intentions … he is too fast for LBrs, to fluid and savvy for safeties and too big for corners 

 

A++

Exactly he’s too big to jam with a DB and he’s too quick to have a LB cover him. He’s really just a matchup nightmare in this offense with this QB as because of his incredible hands you can just ISO him on a DB and give him a 50/50 ball. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Exactly he’s too big to jam with a DB and he’s too quick to have a LB cover him. He’s really just a matchup nightmare in this offense with this QB as because of his incredible hands you can just ISO him on a DB and give him a 50/50 ball. 

It actually extends farther than that
For a long time we have fans have been complaining about not being able to run the ball. Effectively wonderful we need to.

 

Double tighten sets fix that problem and put a bigger blocker on the field and it’s a matchup problem for the defense

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Chaos said:

Put Shorter on the Field instead of Davis, and you can run a 1960's green bay style sweep with Josh playing Paul Hornung. 

Bold added by me. The bolded part is a "BINGO"

Did you mean ‘Ringo’? Great Packer Center?

yes, “a seal here! And a seal here and run it UP THE ALLEY!”

 


Sean is a good coach, already ascending to 13th winningest HC. But he’ll NEVER be compared to Vincent T. 

Edited by Chandler#81
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...