gobills404 Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 He’s gonna be Josh’s #2 target after Diggs 4 4 1 Quote
Big C Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 7 minutes ago, NoSaint said: though as mentioned early in the night, 4 was the price for 25 and 3 would get them to like 22 or such. It was a predictable price. Not a guy I would’ve guessed it for but with the right coordinator our talent is a real challenge on defenses. hines and Kincaid on the field with knox/Davis/diggs creates a good bit of pressure with 5 guys that have the whole route tree or a physical run set. Yeah. I like this better than any WR they might have taken in this range. 2 1 Quote
MAJBobby Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 3 minutes ago, Bangarang said: We are an offense that doesn’t use TEs. When Knox got his new contract I said it would be a bargain if his usage increased a lot but it didn’t. Same applies here. Could be a great pick if Dorsey has a plan on how he wants to use him and get him the ball. If we just go through the motions with him like we do a lot of other players then it becomes a head scratcher. I imagine Dorsey asked for this so hopefully he can get creative with 2 TE sets. Stop thinking of him as a TE. Start thinking of him as a Jacked up Slot WR 7 Quote
Motorin' Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 26 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: Best hands in draft. Better than the WRs And excels against zone. 2 1 Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 Dying at all the posters who read Michael Mayer is Gronk 2.0 and fell in love simply off of that and parrot the comparison to say we chose the wrong TE. Dalton Kincaid was the top TE in the class. 1 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, Yantha said: Agreed. I think we just drafted our "WR". Yep. Could draft depth WR but I think they go with a big person or LB. Edited April 28, 2023 by Buffalo_Stampede 2 Quote
sullim4 Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 I like the pick. Knox simply has not been a reliable pass catcher and Kincaid seems much better at that. I was never a fan of the Knox contract, and this feels like Beane would want it back if he had the chance as well. 1 2 Quote
Yantha Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, gobills404 said: He’s gonna be Josh’s #2 target after Diggs Eventually. I think this lit a fire under the whole offense. Knox and Davis are pulling all nighters at the gym. Quote
NastyNateSoldiers Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 29 minutes ago, beerme1 said: Our Gronk? Bye Knox? We finally got Zach ERTZ! 1 1 1 Quote
JoPoy88 Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said: In his presser Beane just said that they aren't asking him to do much in the way of blocking. Wonder if they see him more of a big slot than doing much on-line by that comment. They shouldn’t ask him to block much. This is a passing team full stop. It was a shame last year Knox had to stay in more because of the line issues. But even if those issues persist, this kid is a pass catcher, pure and simple. And I’d bet Beane had a higher grade on DK than some of the wideouts that went before him. Dan Jeremiah had him 9th overall. Quote
Special K Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: I don't understand how anyone could hate this pick. We just got an elite pass catcher to pair with Diggs. Go get Hopkins and dare teams to keep up with us. I watched that game...Kincaid is a really good player. I had my sights set on the Bills drafting an OT like Darnell Wright in round 1, but since he and the other good Tackles were off the board, Kincaid is a darn good consolation prize! Quote
MAJBobby Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, BillsFan130 said: Ummm yes?… it’s not baseball with no salary cap so yes It would hurt the roster building… you can keep pushing The cap down the road by extensions/restructures, but got to pay the piper eventually. So just ignore the fact that Josh likes throwing to WRs and we traded up for TE when we underuse our starting TE? We traded up for a TE so, 32.5 catches for Kincaid this year. Over/under? Except it doesn’t. Those that cannot evaluate the game or players turn to cap talk. Do you. Quote
WotAGuy Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 12 minutes ago, ALLEN1QB said: ALL THE HATERS DON'T KNOW JACK!! Umm….his name is “Dalton”. 4 1 Quote
offyourocker Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 Just now, Motorin' said: And excels against zone. We need that and the great hands. 1 Quote
Simon Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said: His hairline is 46.5 Couple more years and he'll be one aerodynamic sonofabitch 2 Quote
NoSaint Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 Just now, offyourocker said: Maybe we trade Knox for Hopkins? Again, think replacement for McKenzie not replacement for Knox 4 1 Quote
Bangarang Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, MAJBobby said: Stop thinking of him as a TE. Start thinking of him as a Jacked up Slot WR The point still stands. Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted April 28, 2023 Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, Bangarang said: We are an offense that doesn’t use TEs. When Knox got his new contract I said it would be a bargain if his usage increased a lot but it didn’t. Same applies here. Could be a great pick if Dorsey has a plan on how he wants to use him and get him the ball. If we just go through the motions with him like we do a lot of other players then it becomes a head scratcher. I imagine Dorsey asked for this so hopefully he can get creative with 2 TE sets. Kincaid is a lot more versatile than simply labeling him a ‘TE’…he’s a much more gifted pass catcher/route runner than Knox. He could line up in the slot every play and never play ‘true’ tight end and he still provides a lot more value than anyone in that late run on wrs would have. 4 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.