Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 6/28/2023 at 6:21 PM, The Frankish Reich said:

My second point: when dealing with a cognitively challenged president, or one who exhibits extremely poor judgement, the best thing is to have a stable team of level-headed advisors in place. In fact, a stable team of level-headed advisors is often preferable to a high-functioning know-it-all who refuses to take advice from persons with expertise in a particular area.

 

Not no, but HELL the bleep bleep NO.

 

With 334,967,580 people in the USA, surely we can find someone not in cognitive decline.  We're not talking about if someone 80 is still OK to work in an office, we're talking about the most powerful person in the world.  

 

Why is it OK to have unelected people making Presidential decisions?  Are you really OK with that?

 

And no, the answer is not President Trump either.

 

 

 

Edited by reddogblitz
Posted
On 6/28/2023 at 6:21 PM, The Frankish Reich said:

My second point: when dealing with a cognitively challenged president, or one who exhibits extremely poor judgement, the best thing is to have a stable team of level-headed advisors in place. In fact, a stable team of level-headed advisors is often preferable to a high-functioning know-it-all who refuses to take advice from persons with expertise in a particular area.

My suspicion is what's in place in the Biden administration is not a group of advisors assisting the President but instead a group of advisors assuming the role of President where the actual person elected by the voters acts as front man to mouth their decisions to the public.  A facade and nothing more.

And who are these advisors?  Do we know their names?  They are unelected unknowns working in the shadows.  What is their source of  direction and agenda?  How did they come to their positions?  Who decided they should be making policy and determining the actions of the executive branch and overall American domestic and foreign policy?

Is having a President in charge of our government an illusion?

More importantly, why is no one in any official capacity raising these questions?  I call this a "soft" coup or if some prefer a quiet insurrection.  No gunfire, no protests, no hearings. No media stories.  Just a quiet takeover of the White House.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

My suspicion is what's in place in the Biden administration is not a group of advisors assisting the President but instead a group of advisors assuming the role of President where the actual person elected by the voters acts as front man to mouth their decisions to the public.  A facade and nothing more.

And who are these advisors?  Do we know their names?  They are unelected unknowns working in the shadows.  What is their source of  direction and agenda?  How did they come to their positions?  Who decided they should be making policy and determining the actions of the executive branch and overall American domestic and foreign policy?

Is having a President in charge of our government an illusion?

More importantly, why is no one in any official capacity raising these questions?  I call this a "soft" coup or if some prefer a quiet insurrection.  No gunfire, no protests, no hearings. No media stories.  Just a quiet takeover of the White House.

 


Was nut job Stephen Miller elected?

 

Was Ivanka elected to work on procuring those Chinese patents?

 

Was Jared elected to cultivate relationships with MBS so he could secure $2 BILlLION?

 

Shall we go on All Pro Psyop?

Posted
4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Was nut job Stephen Miller elected?

 

Was Ivanka elected to work on procuring those Chinese patents?

 

Was Jared elected to cultivate relationships with MBS so he could secure $2 BILlLION?

 

Exactly.

The Executive Branch is a colossus. Not even the best organized, smartest workaholic President could be personally involved in all decisionmaking.

The President-by-Committee is what we have. So I care a lot about the competence and judgement of that committee. Maybe even more than the competence of the President himself?

Posted
8 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Exactly.

The Executive Branch is a colossus. Not even the best organized, smartest workaholic President could be personally involved in all decisionmaking.

The President-by-Committee is what we have. So I care a lot about the competence and judgement of that committee. Maybe even more than the competence of the President himself?


Yes exactly - but we shouldn’t discuss the absolute shitshow of the Trump administration and the constant turnover.

 


Turnover on the president’s “A Team”President Trump’s “A Team” turnover is 92% as of January 20, 2021

 

Who wouldn’t want to be associated with the most corrupt POTUS in our lifetime?

 

 

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, BillStime said:


Was nut job Stephen Miller elected?

 

Was Ivanka elected to work on procuring those Chinese patents?

 

Was Jared elected to cultivate relationships with MBS so he could secure $2 BILlLION?

 

Shall we go on All Pro Psyop?

The difference is we knew what those people were doing.  Can you produce the names of the inner circle calling the shots now?  These people are not there to advise Biden.  They're there to replace him.

This administration is the 3rd term of the Obama administration.  What exactly is Susan Rice's role inside the WH?  What actual duties does she perform?  She's Obama's inside person. There to manage day-to-day.

If you look at Biden's career and 2020 campaign he's spent a lifetime staking out safe middle of the road positions.  The far left focus is definitely out of character.  Prior to January 2021 he's supported none of this.  It's clearly somebody else's agenda.  That agenda belongs to the Obama wing of the party.  Those are the people running the WH.  The elected President?  Not so much.  A shadow government.  So if people not elected are driving the agenda and not the President is this still a democracy?  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
35 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The difference is we knew what those people were doing.  Can you produce the names of the inner circle calling the shots now?  These people are not there to advise Biden.  They're there to replace him.

This administration is the 3rd term of the Obama administration.  What exactly is Susan Rice's role inside the WH?  What actual duties does she perform?  She's Obama's inside person. There to manage day-to-day.

If you look at Biden's career and 2020 campaign he's spent a lifetime staking out safe middle of the road positions.  The far left focus is definitely out of character.  Prior to January 2021 he's supported none of this.  It's clearly somebody else's agenda.  That agenda belongs to the Obama wing of the party.  Those are the people running the WH.  The elected President?  Not so much.  A shadow government.  So if people not elected are driving the agenda and not the President is this still a democracy?  


JFC - listen to you.  What does it say about Trump that 95% of his staff turned over?
 

You felt good about white supremacist Stephen Miller - mister anti brown anti immigration far right not job?

 

And what experience does JaVanka - both who struggled to get security clearances - have being anywhere near the West Wing?

 

Seriously - All Pro Psyop - gtfoh 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


JFC - listen to you.  What does it say about Trump that 95% of his staff turned over?
 

You felt good about white supremacist Stephen Miller - mister anti brown anti immigration far right not job?

 

And what experience does JaVanka - both who struggled to get security clearances - have being anywhere near the West Wing?

 

Seriously - All Pro Psyop - gtfoh 

 

 

I'm not clear how your response addresses my suspicions and theory about what's going on currently in the White House.

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


JFC - listen to you.  What does it say about Trump that 95% of his staff turned over?
 

You felt good about white supremacist Stephen Miller - mister anti brown anti immigration far right not job?

 

And what experience does JaVanka - both who struggled to get security clearances - have being anywhere near the West Wing?

 

Seriously - All Pro Psyop - gtfoh 

 

 


what does trump have to do with what he said? Please explain very clearly 

Posted
16 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I'm not clear how your response addresses my suspicions and theory about what's going on currently in the White House.


lmao - why does it matter?

 

You are fine with make believeand psyops - may the best story win, right?

 

15 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Please explain very clearly 

 


giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7dc8c3d6bd89091d976

Posted
25 minutes ago, BillStime said:


lmao - why does it matter?

 

You are fine with make believeand psyops - may the best story win, right?

 

 


giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7dc8c3d6bd89091d976


can’t explain can you? Simp

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, BillStime said:


lmao - why does it matter?

 

You are fine with make believeand psyops - may the best story win, right?

None of your responses have refuted my contention in any way.

We've got a clearly mentally comprised commander in chief.  It's a credible theory somebody else is driving the agenda.

One repeating situation we see is where an unknown person is directing the President on which questions to answer and when to get off stage.  Who has the authority to command the President to be silent?  Theoretically nobody.  But we witness that in practice.

The idea with theories is to investigate to find things that either support or refute the theory and I see nothing offered anywhere to refute my contention President Biden is a figurehead, fake President.

Posted
17 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

None of your responses have refuted my contention in any way.

We've got a clearly mentally comprised commander in chief.  It's a credible theory somebody else is driving the agenda.

One repeating situation we see is where an unknown person is directing the President on which questions to answer and when to get off stage.  Who has the authority to command the President to be silent?  Theoretically nobody.  But we witness that in practice.

The idea with theories is to investigate to find things that either support or refute the theory and I see nothing offered anywhere to refute my contention President Biden is a figurehead, fake President.


Your feelings are noted.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...