Jump to content

The Bills First Round Selection (#27) will be offense. And from among these five players.


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Nope--maybe you want a tight end more than anything else in this draft, but the Bills do not. 

 

They just shelled out a huge amount for Knox and won't go there again in a few years, especially with Josh Allen always running for his life.  And besides, the OC does not know how to use tight ends well, properly anyway.

 

The Bills, I hope, will finally start fixing their most obvious problem, a weak, always in flux offensive line.  Hoping they trade up to get the best right tackle they can get.

 

 

Edited by Mister Defense
Posted
1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think both are decent players. But how do they change the paradigm? Mayer is a good solid all around tight end. We have one of those. He is name Dawson Knox and he is much more athletically talented than Mayer and we already under use him. Knox is a better matchup weapon. Running Mayer out there instead of a slot receiver makes our O less dynamic IMO. Washington does bring something a bit different. He is an excellent blocker. But again he isn't as good as Knox in space or ball in his hand. So you want to spend a 1st on an in line blocking tight end who might have a bit of additonal redzone value (where Knox is already a top 5 contributor among tight ends)? I don't think that is good value. 

 

Don't get me wrong there are teams for whom Mayer in round 1 makes sense (less so Washington for me, but there you are). But the Bills are not one of them. 

 

Kincaid is a different category altogether. He is a genuine bona fide weapon. He doesn't really block. But 12 personnel where Kincaid and Knox are on the field together is a potential matchup nightmare for defenses so long as Dorsey and Allen can work out how to use them.

I agree Gunner, Kincaid would fit much better then Mayer or Washington I think those guys would just slow are offense down . I rather get someone later rds like Kuntz or Schoonmaker . 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Dr. Who said:

I don't know if that is hyperbole or not, but obviously the pick of a TE early is dependent on Dorsey using 12 personnel. No one is advocating using a first round pick for a backup to Knox and it is disingenuous to suggest such.


There is no chance what so ever the Bills offense is switching to primarily 12 personnel to where Washington got 10+ TDs.  This isn’t Madden where you just click what ever playbook you want.  
 

Dorsey is not going to scrap his entire offense, the offense Allen has excelled in, the offense that has been the top offense over the last 3 seasons to switch to 12 personnel full time for a rookie TE just because there wasn’t a better option at pick 27. 
 

PS:  Try and find a SB winner whose primary offense was 12 personnel.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


There is no chance what so ever the Bills offense is switching to primarily 12 personnel to where Washington got 10+ TDs.  This isn’t Madden where you just click what ever playbook you want.  
 

Dorsey is not going to scrap his entire offense, the offense Allen has excelled in, the offense that has been the top offense over the last 3 seasons to switch to 12 personnel full time for a rookie TE just because there wasn’t a better option at pick 27. 
 

PS:  Try and find a SB winner whose primary offense was 12 personnel.  

I think 12 personnel would be very effective in the RZ where Dorsey so far has shown lack of creativity. That is also where a lot of our turnovers showed up. 12 personnel is a formation that creates more confusion and decision making for the Defense. Supposedly Dorsey has some familiarity with it. I don't think it is an outrageous idea. You are free to think otherwise.

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

I think 12 personnel would be very effective in the RZ where Dorsey so far has shown lack of creativity. That is also where a lot of our turnovers showed up. 12 personnel is a formation that creates more confusion and decision making for the Defense. Supposedly Dorsey has some familiarity with it. I don't think it is an outrageous idea. You are free to think otherwise.


Im not saying he wouldn’t incorporate it, I am saying it’s not going to become a focal point of this offense like so many people keep saying it will if we take a TE in the first.  

Posted
19 hours ago, LEBills said:

Kincaid, though “cleared,” also had a back fracture which I think is going to drop him further than people expect.

 

I remember the last time the Bills passed on a great TE with back issues.

 

I highly doubt Kincaid will still be on the board at 27 but if he is it's hard to imagine him not sticking out as the BPA. It might feel like a weird pick with Knox already locked up on an extension, but you simply can't pass up on a pass catcher with that level of talent in a weak draft whether TE is a glaring need or not.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

I am not lobbying for Flowers.  But FWIW, Greg Cosell, who has watched a minute of NFL film, profiled Zay Flowers as a WR he saw as being able to play at "all 3 levels" in the NFL.

 

To the OP, I'll point out that the same argument people make against drafting ILB in the first, applies to some extent to TE. 

 

The top 10 WR in the league have $20-$30M/yr AAV contracts.

The top 2 TE in the league have contracts over $15M AAV, Kelce is $14.3M, then it tails off down to $10 Even Engram at $11M

 

By the way of the top 10 salary TE in AAV, only two (Njoku and Engram) were drafted in the 1st round.

I don't see Flowers lining up outside but he can certainly be a factor at each of the three field levels.

Posted
23 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I remember the last time the Bills passed on a great TE with back issues.

 

I highly doubt Kincaid will still be on the board at 27 but if he is it's hard to imagine him not sticking out as the BPA. It might feel like a weird pick with Knox already locked up on an extension, but you simply can't pass up on a pass catcher with that level of talent in a weak draft whether TE is a glaring need or not.


I personally would take the risk and take him if he is there because he can function as a big slot and is excellent against zone so he isn’t limited to a TE2 role.

 

Ive just been watching the draft for so long, there are always a few guys with injuries that slip past where all of us non-insiders expect. Even Gronk was a second rounder and I think Kincaid may fall there too. Additionally, I’m not sure the Bills will think of him as more than a TE2 which in most offenses is a role player. Will be happy to be wrong but we will see in a few days.

  • Agree 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, LEBills said:


I personally would take the risk and take him if he is there because he can function as a big slot and is excellent against zone so he isn’t limited to a TE2 role.

 

Ive just been watching the draft for so long, there are always a few guys with injuries that slip past where all of us non-insiders expect. Even Gronk was a second rounder and I think Kincaid may fall there too. Additionally, I’m not sure the Bills will think of him as more than a TE2 which in most offenses is a role player. Will be happy to be wrong but we will see in a few days.

 

Yea we don't have the medicals. And this regime has been VERY wary of prospects without clean medicals early in the draft. I am not saying that will put them off Kincaid if he is there but it is definitely worth some consideration.

1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

Mingo may be in the conversation

 

6’2 220 Elite top speed.
 

DK Metcalf & AJ Brown type

 

If we take Mingo at #27 I might put through my very late night coffee cup through my TV. 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On 4/22/2023 at 5:20 PM, RiotAct said:

we’ll probably be drafting around 10:30 - 11 PM I’d imagine?  Assuming we stay put at 27, that is

Oh.. Thank you! I can't wait to see who is picked!! :)

Posted

Anybody but a TE.  I'd favor WR in the 1st.

 

I say no to TE for 3 reasons;

 

First they have Dawson, he's a good to a little better than average TE.  You want to put a 2nd blocking TE out there for some plays fine, but don't need to use a 1st round pick for that.

 

The Bills don't have a noddle armed QB.  Allen can easily throw a 20 yard out, so IMO better to be throwing it to a WR and better to line line up with 3 WR and 1 TE than 2 and 2.  On occasion throwing two TE's out there is fine but again don't need to use a 1st round pick for that.

 

Last and most important, IMO TE is the 2nd toughest position  to project success in college to the NFL.  QB being #1.  There were 5 TE's selected prior to Knox in the 3rd round, not one of them is still with the team that drafted them.  One is playing in Arena league.  It is just too hard to project who will really be good.  Kelce and Kittle were both drafted lower than Knox, Gronk was taken in 2nd.  So to my point, just too hard to project how great college TE's will turn out in pro's, much harder than other positions it seems and the Kittles, Kelce, and Gronks are just too few and far between.

 

For those wanting a TE in round 1, don't blame Beane in 4 years if the guy bombs out,  blame it on desire to take a TE in 1st.  Probably safer to pick TE lower.

Posted

I think Wright, Flowers, Kincaid and Addison could be in play on offense.  None of them transform this offense to a much higher level (in my opinion).  They would all help.

 

I think defensive players should be under consideration here, including CB and S.  My reasoning is that you have to stop the opposition as well as score on a them.  I’m not a big fan of any of the ILBs in this draft.  Ironically, Campbell seems like the high floor safe choice and that IS what I’m looking for, but he seems like a real stretch at 27. 

Posted

I really think strengthening our OL would pay big dividends and since there aren't any MLB's with a 1st round grade, one of several OT's would be my preference, followed by LB or WR/TE.

Posted
7 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

I think Wright, Flowers, Kincaid and Addison could be in play on offense.  None of them transform this offense to a much higher level (in my opinion).  They would all help.

 

I think defensive players should be under consideration here, including CB and S.  My reasoning is that you have to stop the opposition as well as score on a them.  I’m not a big fan of any of the ILBs in this draft.  Ironically, Campbell seems like the high floor safe choice and that IS what I’m looking for, but he seems like a real stretch at 27. 

ESPN's model gives Campbell a 50% chance of being available at 59.  An even bigger percentage for Drew Sanders.  Bills fans may have whipped ourselves into an LB frenzy. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, GreggTX said:

I really think strengthening our OL would pay big dividends and since there aren't any MLB's with a 1st round grade, one of several OT's would be my preference, followed by LB or WR/TE.

The question is who exactly are the OTs that are worth taking at 27? Paris Johnson and Broderick Jones are not going to be there. Maybe Darnell Wright. It would be great if a potential LT worthy of the pick were available, but it won't happen and you can get a RT in the second or third.

Edited by Dr. Who
Posted
3 minutes ago, GreggTX said:

I really think strengthening our OL would pay big dividends and since there aren't any MLB's with a 1st round grade, one of several OT's would be my preference, followed by LB or WR/TE.

Which OT's do you think are going to be available at 27?

Posted

These small guys are being pushed up the board because of lack of WRs this year. It's rare for a first round small guy to do anything. I hope they don't take flowers. So many diminutive WR busts in the first. T. Austin, J. Ross, W. Fuller just to name a few. Give me a Mingo, Rice, Tillman in the second all day. Get Oline/Mlb/Te in the first. There might be some that were successes but I can't think of any small WR studs in the 1st.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...