Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The reason Clapper can still stand behind the letter he signed is clear to anyone who actually read it.

 

The letter says directly, plainly and clearly that...

 

THEY HAD NO DIRECT EVIDENCE that the laptop contents were part of a Russian disinformation operation.  Instead they say that their experience tells them that it might be.

 

And that was plenty good enough for Politico and the rest to run with the false headline that the laptop IS

Russian disinformation. 

 

See how that works?

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

The reason Clapper can still stand behind the letter he signed is clear to anyone who actually read it.

 

The letter says directly, plainly and clearly that...

 

THEY HAD NO DIRECT EVIDENCE that the laptop contents were part of a Russian disinformation operation.  Instead they say that their experience tells them that it might be.

 

And that was plenty good enough for Politico and the rest to run with the false headline that the laptop IS

Russian disinformation. 

 

See how that works?

 

 

 

Of course he did.  He's a clown.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Of course he did.  He's a clown.

 

Indeed he is. But he and the rest left themselves an out.

 

"The letter clearly said that we had no direct evidence and that we were only going with our experience and intuition that it might be Russian disinformation.  It's not our fault that the entire media misled the country by not accurately reporting what we signed our names to...."

 

I

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Indeed he is. But he and the rest left themselves an out.

 

"The letter clearly said that we had no direct evidence and that we were only going with our experience and intuition that it might be Russian disinformation.  It's not our fault that the entire media misled the country by not accurately reporting what we signed our names to...."

 

Yup.  But if they had no evidence, they had no business signing onto a letter that influenced the election.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  But if they had no evidence, they had no business signing onto a letter that influenced the election.

 

They'll keep on doing it until the IC as we know it is smashed into 1000 pieces.

 

The good thing is that half or more of the country now knows to dismiss reporting based on IC sources immediately without a moments pause.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Facebook was looking to earn favors with the Biden-Harris regime when they censored the Hunter Biden laptop story.  

I've just obtained the full 82-paged report that the Judiciary Committee is about to release.  

"Obviously, our calls on this could colour the way an incoming Biden administration views us more than almost anything else..." said Faecbook's then- Vice President of Global Affairs Nick Glegg in an internal message.  

One Microsoft employee said the, "FBI tipped us all off last week that this Burisma story was likely to emerge." This happened on October 14, 2020. That's the same day The New York Post released the story.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

The U.S. government system is MUCH more corrupt than I had even imagined!

 

Not sure why even Libs don't welcome the light being shown on all this.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
2 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

How is the laptop? I hope it is well. 

 

People just can't stop talking about it 

 

It did its job...

Posted

All this deep state nonsense is even dumber when one looks at the bloodbath that is the Trump 2.0 economy.  This weekend many American families struggled with higher costs, a softening job market, and a rapidly declining stock market.  Trump struggled with whether to go three wood or driver off of the tee.  Sick and sad. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Doc said:

 

It did its job...

Did it? I saw Trump rambling on about it looking like the crazy idiot he is. 

 

You think it helped get votes? Doubt that. It's food for the rabid fringe 

 

Perhaps its a distraction so people won't think much of Trump's deep admiration of the mass murderer Putin 

Posted
2 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Did it? I saw Trump rambling on about it looking like the crazy idiot he is. 

 

You think it helped get votes? Doubt that. It's food for the rabid fringe 

 

Perhaps its a distraction so people won't think much of Trump's deep admiration of the mass murderer Putin 

 

It was real.  Biden and the Dems, including "former intelligence officials" lied about it and were caught in the lie.  So yes, it did.

×
×
  • Create New...