Jump to content

Which NFL player did you think was going to be good but turned out to be a bust?


Magox

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Neither of those are busts. They might both have been poor uses of a first round pick, but neither were busts IMO. McKelvin played 9 years in the league, started 72 games, and was a starting level corner (although I agree not worth the pick they spent). Whitner played 11 years, started 152 games and went to two probowls. That isn't a bust. 

 

That is what I mean there HAS to be a way of distinguishing between a guy who was maybe overdrafted, or maybe didn't quite meet expectation, or maybe just wasn't the best player on the board when a team picked and a guy who is a flat out failure in the NFL. Aaron Maybin was a bust. 

You think and often post as a draftnik which is great and even much appreciated. The thing is, selections like McKelvin and Whitner would get you fired in the NFL. Do tell me, what difference does it make if a player is "good" when you are losing football games? 

 

As a GM or head coach trying of course to win football games, the only real goal should be to bring in players who will win you said football games. Between McKelvin and Whitner, how many games did they in fact win for us? Now, think of players such as Josh, Bruce, Kelly and Andre. These players were/are winners.

Again, inept management (Levy/Jauron for instance) said no to drafting great players to draft the likes of Whitner/McKelvin (yes I know that Levy didn't draft McKelvin) and use huge amounts of cap space to do so. 

 

We can dance around with semantics if you choose to do so but in terms of winning football games (the ultimate goal), the above mentioned players were busts, as were most of the players mentioned in this thread.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

You think and often post as a draftnik which is great and even much appreciated. The thing is, selections like McKelvin and Whitner would get you fired in the NFL. Do tell me, what difference does it make if a player is "good" when you are losing football games? 

 

As a GM or head coach trying of course to win football games, the only real goal should be to bring in players who will win you said football games. Between McKelvin and Whitner, how many games did they in fact win for us? Now, think of players such as Josh, Bruce, Kelly and Andre. These players were/are winners.

Again, inept management (Levy/Jauron for instance) said no to drafting great players to draft the likes of Whitner/McKelvin (yes I know that Levy didn't draft McKelvin) and use huge amounts of cap space to do so. 

 

We can dance around with semantics if you choose to do so but in terms of winning football games (the ultimate goal), the above mentioned players were busts, as were most of the players mentioned in this thread.

 

Winning football games comes down to more than one thing. When you are losing not everything you do is therefore a failure. Just as when you are winning not everything you are doing is therefore a success. The Bills could have made better picks that McKelvin and Whitner. But that does not make them busts. Otherwise almost every player ever drafted is a bust. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2023 at 10:26 AM, Sestak4ever said:

Trent Richardson. Was unstoppable against good competition in the SEC. I think it was more mental than physical for him. Didn’t have the desire and never wanted to work at his craft.

When I watched him, he had no instincts. 

 

Commentators in Cleveland would talk about how he ran up the backs of his blockers, and you only saw the talent after contact was made and he was twisting and pulling for extra yards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/21/2023 at 7:04 PM, Goin Breakdown said:

Man this is hard because if they are "sneaky" good then I can't say the word bust because there wasn't a clear "sure thing" label on them. 
 

I did have hopes for Trent edwards but....... you know. And James Hardy. 

I remember going to a kids day against the Bengals with my ex wife, Hardy was so damn sloppy that day. Told her he was going to get cut. Bonehead flash start nailed it for me. 

 

I liked him and thought he'd be pretty good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2023 at 3:51 AM, SirAndrew said:

This is where I view it differently. I’d say that not living up to one’s draft selection is the exact definition of bust. 

 

It's that simple? It's binary?

 

There's no grey area? What if the player lives up to one person's expectations but not another's?

 

Was John Fina a bust? Lee Evans? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chance Warmack. Several league guys told me he was a can’t miss blue chipper. Hyped him up like he was the next John Hannah, Joe D, or Larry Allen. Never been more wrong about a prospect coming out. Just didn’t have the fire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

It's that simple? It's binary?

 

There's no grey area? What if the player lives up to one person's expectations but not another's?

 

Was John Fina a bust? Lee Evans? 

 

There’s definitely some grey area, because living up to expectations is subjective. I’m just saying that most draft picks can’t be considered busts. No one expects the seventh round pick to be a starter, while people expect top ten picks to change the franchise. This puts more expectations on the first rounder, making him more likely to be considered a bust.
 

I think of our QB situation over the years. I’d easily consider Losman and Manuel as busts, while Trent Edwards wasn’t a bust by my standards. Third round QB’s aren’t expected to be franchise guys. Lastly, would I consider Evans or Fina a bust? No, we got seven good seasons out of Lee Evans, and Fina was average, but as a guy taken lower in the first round, he contributed to this team for a decent amount of time. 

Edited by SirAndrew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/21/2023 at 7:00 PM, Magox said:

I got to thinking the other day, which player did I believe was going to be a sneaky good player in the league that was a complete bust?

 

For me I was sure that Andy Isabella was going to be a good WR in this league, and he hasn't done jack squat.

I actually thought Christian Ponder was going to surprise a lot of people.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Playoffs? said:

This for me too.. he was absolutely dominant at Penn State. 

Brown got injured and it ruined his career. He looked amazing beforehand. I think injuries disqualify someone from being a bust if they looked good before the injuries. Steve Emtman was dominant early on, but his injury rendered him a shell of himself. If not for the injuries, both Brown and Emtman would have been excellent players, I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2023 at 7:35 AM, Bill from NYC said:

OK, I'll say it.........Rob Johnson

 

I saw him play once when he was in college, and I caught an NFL game he was in before we traded for him. I was impressed by his size, accuracy, arm strength, and ability to run.  RJ had everything.....except  a head for the game.

 

Even after it was apparent that he would never amount to much (to be kind), I was waiting in the back of my mind for RJ to step up one day and to watch his tremendous skillset take over. Obviously this never happened. 

 

The scouts seemed to know about RJ before we did. Iirc, he was the 1st pick of round 4.  One would think that a QB with his talent would be selected FAR earlier. RJ made me rate QBs in a different way today. Let's see how Anthony Richardson fares in the NFL. He has all the talent in the world but does he have a feel for the game? I know I wouldn't touch him if I were a GM.

In three seasons as a starter on a loaded USC team with Tony Boselli as his LT and a sequence of #1 receivers that included Curtis Conway, Johnny Morton, and Keyshawn Johnson, he never beat ND or UCLA and repeatedly choked in those games. His brother Brett was the number one QB coming out of high school and flamed out at UCLA too (he blamed the program, transferred to Michigan State, and flamed out there too). There was something about RJ: despite the obvious physical talent, he dropped to round 4 for very good reasons. I was never a believer.

 

In his final performance against UCLA in 1994, he was sacked 6 times and turned the ball over three times in a 31-19 loss. And USC was WAY more talented than UCLA that year. The six sacks were a harbinger of things to come. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-11-20-sp-65097-story.html

Edited by dave mcbride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

As an Irish fan, I thought Brady Quinn was going to be a good NFL QB.

 

Side note, I still wonder how Jeff Samardzija would have fared as a WR in the NFL, even though he made the right choice in going instead to the MLB.

Funny, I heard him talk about his nfl experience just the other day. He talked about how the team that drafted him changed coordinators multiple times in his first contract and also lost a lot of talent. I.e. he was set-up for failure or not good enough to overcome those obstacles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...