Straight Hucklebuck Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 4 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Unacceptable if that's the case. This team needs more firepower. Especially on Offense. If they pass on WR at #27, I do wonder what’s left at #59. Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: If they pass on WR at #27, I do wonder what’s left at #59. If we don't take WR at 27, it better be OT, TE or Robinson Quote
Straight Hucklebuck Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: If we don't take WR at 27, it better be OT, TE or Robinson That’s the perceived dilemma. No fan is excited about Bernard, Dodson or Spector competing. Maybe the Bills are telling the truth, and they think 1 of those 3 can be a starting MLB. If so, then WR is firmly in play at #27. But the other factor here is, there are only two linebackers in this draft that scouts are excited about as a starting MLB - Sanders and Campebell. If you pass on both of them at #27, are you betting that you can get one of them at #59? And with only (6) picks, can the Bills really afford to trade up? And so, it’s pass on Campbell/Sanders at #27 and then having to trade back 10-picks or so to get one of them, and what are you getting for that move down? A 4th? That doesn’t solve the weapons problem. 1 Quote
Don Otreply Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said: Hope we made a fair offer. 😂, Vet minimum is top one percent income in America, so I’m pretty sure he will be okay, 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: That’s the perceived dilemma. No fan is excited about Bernard, Dodson or Spector competing. Maybe the Bills are telling the truth, and they think 1 of those 3 can be a starting MLB. If so, then WR is firmly in play at #27. But the other factor here is, there are only two linebackers in this draft that scouts are excited about as a starting MLB - Sanders and Campebell. If you pass on both of them at #27, are you betting that you can get one of them at #59? And with only (6) picks, can the Bills really afford to trade up? And so, it’s pass on Campbell/Sanders at #27 and then having to trade back 10-picks or so to get one of them, and what are you getting for that move down? A 4th? That doesn’t solve the weapons problem. You have a few other options. Sign Zach Cunningham wait for a veteran LB to be cut in the summer Or trade a late 2024 draft pick for an LB that isn't a scheme fit on their team I'm just tired of spending premium picks on Defense Edited April 10, 2023 by Warriorspikes51 3 Quote
US Egg Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 (edited) Uninspiring signing, not that it was suppose to be inspiring. Edited April 10, 2023 by I am the egg man Quote
Straight Hucklebuck Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: You have a few other options. Sign Zach Cunningham wait for a veteran LB to be cut in the summer Or trade a late 2024 draft pick for an LB that isn't a scheme fit on their team I'm just tired of spending premium picks on Defense The only thing is they’re running out of money. We know the 2023 cap is less than $8M in space now, and that’s got to cover rookies and IR money, and Beane has said 2024 is already tight. So they need cheap labor. Dip into 2024 picks to secure a weapon and Campbell/Sanders early in this draft? Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: The only thing is they’re running out of money. We know the 2023 cap is less than $8M in space now, and that’s got to cover rookies and IR money, and Beane has said 2024 is already tight. So they need cheap labor. Dip into 2024 picks to secure a weapon and Campbell/Sanders early in this draft? Extend DaQuan Jones. There's a nice chunk. Trade Oliver, there's 10 Million Quote
Bobby Hooks Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 minute ago, I am the egg man said: Uninspiring event. Uninspiring event. I mean, we weren’t going to sign a big money guy, and the team is better than it was before the signing. So I’d say it’s mildly inspirational. 2 1 Quote
EasternOHBillsFan Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 What I'd love: A big time offensive lineman or TE to greatly aid in our offense What we'll get: Another McDermott defensive player Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 Just now, Bobby Hooks said: I mean, we weren’t going to sign a big money guy, and the team is better than it was before the signing. So I’d say it’s mildly inspirational. I want Melvin Ingram. The guy plays strong, nasty and is a complete game wrecker. He has singlehandedly ruined games against us with PIT, KC and MIA 2 Quote
BuffaloBill Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Matt_In_NH said: Unless he has a bad labrum what if it is mediocre? 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I want Melvin Ingram. The guy plays strong, nasty and is a complete game wrecker. He has singlehandedly ruined games against us with PIT, KC and MIA Yeah .. but Ingram isn’t gunna take $1.7 M to come here …would also cost them their comp pick I think … Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 Just now, Aussie Joe said: Yeah .. but Ingram isn’t gunna take $1.7 M to come here …would also cost them their comp pick I think … He may still be available after the draft, then it wouldn't Quote
SCBills Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 14 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: That’s the perceived dilemma. No fan is excited about Bernard, Dodson or Spector competing. Maybe the Bills are telling the truth, and they think 1 of those 3 can be a starting MLB. If so, then WR is firmly in play at #27. But the other factor here is, there are only two linebackers in this draft that scouts are excited about as a starting MLB - Sanders and Campebell. If you pass on both of them at #27, are you betting that you can get one of them at #59? And with only (6) picks, can the Bills really afford to trade up? And so, it’s pass on Campbell/Sanders at #27 and then having to trade back 10-picks or so to get one of them, and what are you getting for that move down? A 4th? That doesn’t solve the weapons problem. I’m excited about Bernard, Dodson and Spector competing if the alternative is drafting a LB at 27. 1 1 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: He may still be available after the draft, then it wouldn't They can’t wait that long … he may still decide to not come here or even retire so what do they do then? Quote
damj Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 Great news. I was hoping we could bring him back Quote
Bobby Hooks Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I want Melvin Ingram. The guy plays strong, nasty and is a complete game wrecker. He has singlehandedly ruined games against us with PIT, KC and MIA I’d take him too, what does that have to do with my post? Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: They can’t wait that long … he may still decide to not come here or even retire so what do they do then? Most of the veterans on the market now will wait to see what teams actually have a spot available and didn't draft their position Just now, Bobby Hooks said: I’d take him too, what does that have to do with my post? You said Shaq was mildly inspirational. I was thinking Ingram would be inspirational Quote
dorquemada Posted April 10, 2023 Posted April 10, 2023 1 hour ago, BananaB said: Same result in playoffs Yeah i get your sputtering rage in a general sense but being mad about Shaq Lawson isn't it dude. He's been a very good player for the Bills, and you certainly aren't going to get an upgrade for what he's making 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.