Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I slammed them hard in live chat about going Edge in round 1 and ignoring ILB in early rounds. But... Listening to them talk about going Edge in round 1. They do make sense though I still disagree. I am hoping I am right about going Edge round 1 is a horrible decision but maybe someone here can prove me wrong?

 

here is the link.

 

  • Vomit 3
  • Dislike 1
Posted

It's a position with a high bust rate.  Unless I had a top 10 pick or unless there was a very compelling need,  I would not select one before R3 or 4 as a general rule.  The Bills have neither,  but that hasn't stopped them before. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Brandon said:

It's a position with a high bust rate.  Unless I had a top 10 pick or unless there was a very compelling need,  I would not select one before R3 or 4 as a general rule.  The Bills have neither,  but that hasn't stopped them before. 

I think Aaron Maybin would disagree with you, that being said.. edge blitzers are highly sought after and because of that, so many of them are picked... thus making their bust ratio higher because of it. But.. yea again.. Edge here, just does not make sense to me. 

Edited by PrimeTime101
Posted

I do feel like we could use another piece at EDGE, but I wonder if it doesn’t make more sense to just wait until we get closer to camp and sign one of the many pass rushers still available.  
 

This is a huge year for Rousseau, and the Bills will want to give Epenesa every chance to show he warrants a legit second contract, here, or elsewhere, but we could really use a reliable vet pass rusher to throw in the rotation and allow us to bring Von back slowly.  
 

If we do go defense again 27, it should be DL.   LB is just such a value waste for that pick in a modern defense. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SCBills said:

I do feel like we could use another piece at EDGE, but I wonder if it doesn’t make more sense to just wait until we get closer to camp and sign one of the many pass rushers still available.  
 

This is a huge year for Rousseau, and the Bills will want to give Epenesa every chance to show he warrants a legit second contract, here, or elsewhere, but we could really use a reliable vet pass rusher to throw in the rotation and allow us to bring Von back slowly.  
 

If we do go defense again 27, it should be DL.   LB is just such a value waste for that pick in a modern defense. 

where is Edge on your list for round 1? first? second? third choice?

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

where is Edge on your list for round 1? first? second? third choice?

 


In RD1:

 

OT

WR

Bijan Robinson

DL (EDGE or DT)

 

I guess it would be 4th, but not so distant that I’d be upset if they picked that position at 27.   I think all four of those make sense in RD1. 

 

As far as linebacker goes, I don’t really have much of an appetite for drafting one at all.  Let Bernard, Dodson and Spector battle it out and/or sign a vet who fits our scheme during camp cuts. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Vomit 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SCBills said:


In RD1:

 

OT

WR

Bijan Robinson

DL (EDGE or DT)

 

I guess it would be 4th, but not so distant that I’d be upset if they picked that position at 27.   I think all four of those make sense in RD1. 

 

As far as linebacker goes, I don’t really have much of an appetite for drafting one at all.  Let Bernard, Dodson and Spector battle it out and/or sign a vet who fits our scheme during camp cuts. 

IDK, I think going Defense round 1 or the thought of it, in yet another draft? just makes me physically ill lol

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Dislike 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I’ve been saying this stuff about edge for awhile. Sometimes I think these guys read here and take their content from here. 

Lol no.. these guys spend a lot of time doing their own homework.

Just now, GunnerBill said:

Who did they pick?

Will McDonnald IV Edge.

Posted
2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

Lol no.. these guys spend a lot of time doing their own homework.

Will McDonnald IV Edge.

 

Yea I can see the case for McDonald. It is a projection because he was largely misused in college IMO. But I like him. Would like him more in a trade down.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

Lol no.. these guys spend a lot of time doing their own homework.

Will McDonnald IV Edge.


Yeah i get that, but some of us were talking about going edge since the combine…now all of a sudden the switch? Very convenient. 

  • Vomit 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

IDK, I think going Defense round 1 or the thought of it, in yet another draft? just makes me physically ill lol


If there’s a legit Tackle available when we pick, and we go DL over OT, I’ll probably have the same reaction.  
 

I get it, if they truly believe in Brown to make a jump and the Kromer “Year Two”

effect, but … yea …. 
 

DL over WR makes sense if they don’t feel there’s a huge difference between what’s there at 27 and what will be there in RD2.   Which could very well be plausible. 
 

Or maybe they see how the draft falls after RD1 and we then pull a draft day trade for Hopkins. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, SCBills said:


If there’s a legit Tackle available when we pick, and we go DL over OT, I’ll probably have the same reaction.  
 

I get it, if they truly believe in Brown to make a jump and the Kromer “Year Two”

effect, but … yea …. 
 

DL over WR makes sense if they don’t feel there’s a huge difference between what’s there at 27 and what will be there in RD2.   Which could very well be plausible. 
 

Or maybe they see how the draft falls after RD1 and we then pull a draft day trade for Hopkins. 

thanks

Posted
51 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

I think Aaron Maybin would disagree with you, that being said.. edge blitzers are highly sought after and because of that, so many of them are picked... thus making their bust ratio higher because of it. But.. yea again.. Edge here, just does not make sense to me. 

 

Aaron Maybin was probably the most obvious bust I've ever seen the Bills take over the last 30+ years.  It's a classic example of why a team shouldn't reach for a player just based on high positional value.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...