Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The more I think about it this makes the most sense. Imo the pressure is on Beane to make this draft work and fortifying Josh would be the best bet, whether it be a stud RB, a top tier WR or a OL to help solidify the trenches. To me it’s really between a stud RB or a mainstay OL because to hear Beane a top WR isn’t as important as one would think. 
 

Not having an abundance of draft picks this year I expect Beane to tap into the the 2024 draft resource to make this happen, either using a day 2 or 3 pick to move up in this year’s draft. Why not use a future draft pick when the heat is on now for a successful draft. If Beane comes up short this year he may not have to worry about next year’s draft. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 5
  • Haha (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted

I love this time of the year, it’s the most exciting outside of the games themselves. Bear with me the draft will be here soon enough and then you won’t hear that much from me the rest of the year. All I do is envision different scenarios from all different angles, I only post about 5% of what goes through my head. If ESPN (not that they are the most credible) is posting this then it gives me even more hope that something like this will happen. 

2 minutes ago, Herb Nightly said:

So ,you just read Matt Miller on ESPN Insider? Nothing to see here.. 

If I had it…

Posted
3 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

It only makes sense. Why wouldn’t Beane do something like this, it’s no secret that he’s been whiffing on most of his drafts and the way the season ended last year there’s been talk about him having some heat on him. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted

Trading up makes sense for Paris Johnson or Peter Skoronski.  Two very good olinemen who would start in 2023. Trading up for anyone else would seem to be foolish to me. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Trading up makes sense for Paris Johnson or Peter Skoronski.  Two very good olinemen who would start in 2023. Trading up for anyone else would seem to be foolish to me. 

 

I wouldn't complain at all, but this would be uncharacteristic of Beane.  

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

I wouldn't complain at all, but this would be uncharacteristic of Beane.  

This thread is about trading up. What trade ups would be more characteristic of Beane? 

Edited by Chaos
Posted
1 hour ago, Tipster19 said:

The more I think about it this makes the most sense. Imo the pressure is on Beane to make this draft work and fortifying Josh would be the best bet, whether it be a stud RB, a top tier WR or a OL to help solidify the trenches. To me it’s really between a stud RB or a mainstay OL because to hear Beane a top WR isn’t as important as one would think. 
 

Not having an abundance of draft picks this year I expect Beane to tap into the the 2024 draft resource to make this happen, either using a day 2 or 3 pick to move up in this year’s draft. Why not use a future draft pick when the heat is on now for a successful draft. If Beane comes up short this year he may not have to worry about next year’s draft. 


a day 2 pick next year barely moves the needle, I’m not sure a day 3 pick gets them any traction in round 1 at all. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chaos said:

This thread is about trading up. What trade ups would be more characteristic of Beane? 

 

A defensive player.  Possibly Torrence, I guess, if they're going offensive line.

 

By projections, they'd have to get up pretty far to get either Skaronski or Johnson.  

Posted
15 minutes ago, Yantha said:

Offensive players are locker room cancers.

 

I prefer nice people.

Defensive players are paranoid and conspiracy mongers.

 

You can't win either way.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

A defensive player.  Possibly Torrence, I guess, if they're going offensive line.

 

By projections, they'd have to get up pretty far to get either Skaronski or Johnson.  

Probably next years #1.  With older Von Miller, Older Jordan Poyer, Older Mycah Hyde, Older Mitch Morris (all four of whom are broken to various degrees plus a broken Tre White) would indicate 2023 is a win now year.  Personally I don't care much about saving nexts years #1 as the foundation of a new rebuild.  But pretty good chance all of those guys are gone. And then we are building around Allen, Johnson/Skoronski-Dawkins-McGovern, a new Center (I would hope to get Tippman with our second round pick this year).  Allen and strong line is the best foundation we can hope for after the mass exodus we should expect after this season. 

  • Vomit 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tipster19 said:

The more I think about it this makes the most sense. Imo the pressure is on Beane to make this draft work and fortifying Josh would be the best bet, whether it be a stud RB, a top tier WR or a OL to help solidify the trenches. To me it’s really between a stud RB or a mainstay OL because to hear Beane a top WR isn’t as important as one would think. 
 

Not having an abundance of draft picks this year I expect Beane to tap into the the 2024 draft resource to make this happen, either using a day 2 or 3 pick to move up in this year’s draft. Why not use a future draft pick when the heat is on now for a successful draft. If Beane comes up short this year he may not have to worry about next year’s draft. 


my money’s on you being wrong, and so far I’ve never lost.

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

A defensive player.  Possibly Torrence, I guess, if they're going offensive line.

 

By projections, they'd have to get up pretty far to get either Skaronski or Johnson.  

Something like this seems like a good trade up to me.   At least I would be pretty excited about season.  

 

Screenshot 2023-04-08 084349.jpg

Edited by Chaos
  • Dislike 2
Posted

Trading up in the 1st to get a RB is a good way to get fired. With it already being 50/50 Beane still has a job after this season, I wouldn’t rule it out entirely. Desperate, cornered animals do unpredictable things.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...