Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I hear ya. Good points.  I don’t think he’s a 1 just yet, but I think he could be. He’s really explosive, just doesn’t get the looks in that offense.  


 

Nor will he, we have too many more talented and reliable players to feed for him to be getting another contract here.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

I needed that specific player... didn't feel like an overpay

Yeah.  And zero downfield WR threats. When’s the last time a wishbone team won a SB?  You have a team that was a THREE QB injuries away from a SB appearance and scrap it for the wishbone….. questionable. 
 

Aiyuk was instrumental in that offense.  He kept the defenses honest.  

I get the fit-  gave up too much imo

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I think you killed that trade.
 

If I were the saints, I’d have traded everyone of value and taken your dead cap lumps this year while tanking for Caleb or Drake.  

I think the only way they give up more is if there’s another team seriously interested. 
 

dunno if that’s the case.  

 

11 minutes ago, mannc said:

It would definitely cost them more than that.  

No wonder you think I overpaid...you basically force traded with the AI in Madden:lol: 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said:

 

Just curious since I don't quite recall...for example, how would it go about for Bills regarding a trade when it's TSW poll?

 

Good question for @Virgil. But I'm guessing the Broncos could pose a trade offer and that could get added as one of the poll options. 

Edited by Motorin'
Posted
5 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said:

 

Just curious since I don't quite recall...for example, how would it go about for Bills regarding a trade when it's TSW poll?

 

We've done it once before when their was a consensus player that everyone wanted.  However, I don't see that player this year.  I based it off the vibe of discussion

Just now, Motorin' said:

 

Good question for @Virgil. But I'm guessing the Broncos could pose a trade offer and that could get added as one of the pole options. 

 

If a trade doesn't happen before the Bills pick, I have zero issues putting an option for a Broncos trade for Jeudy

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

 

No wonder you think I overpaid...you basically force traded with the AI in Madden:lol: 

What on earth are you talking about?

Posted
2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Yeah.  And zero downfield WR threats. When’s the last time a wishbone team won a SB?  You have a team that was a THREE QB injuries away from a SB appearance and scrap it for the wishbone….. questionable. 
 

Aiyuk was instrumental in that offense.  He kept the defenses honest.  

I get the fit-  gave up too much imo

 

I tried to acquire a better WR, hasn't panned out yet. I traded a comp pick and a player who wasn't getting re-signed. 

Just now, mannc said:

What on earth are you talking about?

A mid 2nd rounder for Rodgers? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

 

A mid 2nd rounder for Rodgers? 

You seriously think the Packers would trade him for anything less than a 1st?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

 

No wonder you think I overpaid...you basically force traded with the AI in Madden:lol: 

Yes…. We were basically forced to trade.  
 

We just wanted to settle on something that both teams would be ok with.  It’s a pretend exercise.  No reason to waste real life hours going back and forth on a trade that has to happen.
 

Who else would be interested in AR?  No one interested, less demand, lower price.  A 2nd and a WR is a decent price.  I offered #13 overall but while getting back the packers 3rd rd pick but was declined.
 

 

7 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

I tried to acquire a better WR, hasn't panned out yet. I traded a comp pick and a player who wasn't getting re-signed. 

A mid 2nd rounder for Rodgers? 

You traded a player that plays a vital role in the SF SB hopes.  So you can run the wishbone  

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, NewEra said:

Yes…. We were basically forced to trade.  
 

We just wanted to settle on something that both teams would be ok with.  It’s a pretend exercise.  No reason to waste real life hours going back and forth on a trade that has to happen.
 

Who else would be interested in AR?  No one interested, less demand, lower price.  A 2nd and a WR is a decent price.  I offered #13 overall but while getting back the packers 3rd rd pick but was declined.
 

 

No worries...I got the better QB anyways:wub:

Posted
2 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:

In this mock draft environment, should the ravens be allowed to offer up Lamar Jackson in a trade with the prerequisite that he signs his franchise tag? 

Have you asked his mother if it's ok?

6 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Yes…. We were basically forced to trade.  
 

We just wanted to settle on something that both teams would be ok with.  It’s a pretend exercise.  No reason to waste real life hours going back and forth on a trade that has to happen.
 

Who else would be interested in AR?  No one interested, less demand, lower price.  A 2nd and a WR is a decent price.  I offered #13 overall but while getting back the packers 3rd rd pick but was declined.
 

 

You traded a player that plays a vital role in the SF SB hopes.  So you can run the wishbone  

You're gonna be wishing that you had my players when we're getting our feet fitted for Super Bowl toe rings

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Virgil said:

 

We've done it once before when their was a consensus player that everyone wanted.  However, I don't see that player this year.  I based it off the vibe of discussion

 

If a trade doesn't happen before the Bills pick, I have zero issues putting an option for a Broncos trade for Jeudy

Ok I know quite a few were interested in Jeudy so not sure if you would consider him a consensus type or not, but if someone were  to bring it to your attention, I assume you'd do a poll or does it take a certain amount of request for a poll?

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said:

Huh? That's what I'm talking about...

We're not communicating clearly.  My original statement was that the Pack would not trade Rodgers for only a second round pick and Corey Davis...I'm not sure why you took issue with that statement. 

Edited by mannc
Posted
Just now, mannc said:

We're not communicating clearly.  My original statement was that the Pack would not trade Rodgers for only a second round pick and Corey Davis...I'm not sure why you took issue with that statement. 

I didn't, I was agreeing with you lol

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:

In this mock draft environment, should the ravens be allowed to offer up Lamar Jackson in a trade with the prerequisite that he signs his franchise tag? 

 

I just looked it up.  Since Lamar hasn't signed the tag, he is not eligible to be traded yet.  

 

If there's something out there that proves it wrong, please post it

Posted
4 minutes ago, mannc said:

We're not communicating clearly.  My original statement was that the Pack would not trade Rodgers for only a second round pick and Corey Davis...I'm not sure why you took issue with that statement. 

 

I don't know about that since Rodgers is basically at the end of his career. I mean what would you guess, 1 or 2 seasons left at most? Also seems like Packers are tired of his ***** at this point also and I'm sure Rodgers is tired of theirs....

 

A 2nd round pick number 42 or 43 along with a Corey Davis WR could definitely be possible that Packers could do imo

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said:

 

I don't know about that since Rodgers is basically at the end of his career. I mean what would you guess, 1 or 2 seasons left at most? Also seems like Packers are tired of his ***** at this point also and I'm sure Rodgers is tired of theirs....

 

A 2nd round pick number 42 or 43 along with a Corey Davis WR could definitely be possible that Packers could do imo

I don’t think so.  Rodgers is still a top 5 or 6 QB.  If the Packers trade him, they are essentially taking a powder in 2023…I wouldn’t be surprised if they want 2 firsts

Edited by mannc
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...