Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 36 minutes ago, NewEra said: I hear ya. Good points. I don’t think he’s a 1 just yet, but I think he could be. He’s really explosive, just doesn’t get the looks in that offense. Nor will he, we have too many more talented and reliable players to feed for him to be getting another contract here. Quote
NewEra Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: I needed that specific player... didn't feel like an overpay Yeah. And zero downfield WR threats. When’s the last time a wishbone team won a SB? You have a team that was a THREE QB injuries away from a SB appearance and scrap it for the wishbone….. questionable. Aiyuk was instrumental in that offense. He kept the defenses honest. I get the fit- gave up too much imo Quote
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 17 minutes ago, NewEra said: I think you killed that trade. If I were the saints, I’d have traded everyone of value and taken your dead cap lumps this year while tanking for Caleb or Drake. I think the only way they give up more is if there’s another team seriously interested. dunno if that’s the case. 11 minutes ago, mannc said: It would definitely cost them more than that. No wonder you think I overpaid...you basically force traded with the AI in Madden Quote
Motorin' Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said: Just curious since I don't quite recall...for example, how would it go about for Bills regarding a trade when it's TSW poll? Good question for @Virgil. But I'm guessing the Broncos could pose a trade offer and that could get added as one of the poll options. Edited April 6, 2023 by Motorin' Quote
Virgil Posted April 6, 2023 Author Posted April 6, 2023 5 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said: Just curious since I don't quite recall...for example, how would it go about for Bills regarding a trade when it's TSW poll? We've done it once before when their was a consensus player that everyone wanted. However, I don't see that player this year. I based it off the vibe of discussion Just now, Motorin' said: Good question for @Virgil. But I'm guessing the Broncos could pose a trade offer and that could get added as one of the pole options. If a trade doesn't happen before the Bills pick, I have zero issues putting an option for a Broncos trade for Jeudy 1 Quote
mannc Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: No wonder you think I overpaid...you basically force traded with the AI in Madden What on earth are you talking about? Quote
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, NewEra said: Yeah. And zero downfield WR threats. When’s the last time a wishbone team won a SB? You have a team that was a THREE QB injuries away from a SB appearance and scrap it for the wishbone….. questionable. Aiyuk was instrumental in that offense. He kept the defenses honest. I get the fit- gave up too much imo I tried to acquire a better WR, hasn't panned out yet. I traded a comp pick and a player who wasn't getting re-signed. Just now, mannc said: What on earth are you talking about? A mid 2nd rounder for Rodgers? Quote
mannc Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: A mid 2nd rounder for Rodgers? You seriously think the Packers would trade him for anything less than a 1st? Quote
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 1 minute ago, mannc said: You seriously think the Packers would trade him for anything less than a 1st? Huh? That's what I'm talking about... Quote
Zerovoltz Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 Chiefs are targeting a certain player. If he makes it to about 19-20, Ill be looking to move up. 1 Quote
NewEra Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: No wonder you think I overpaid...you basically force traded with the AI in Madden Yes…. We were basically forced to trade. We just wanted to settle on something that both teams would be ok with. It’s a pretend exercise. No reason to waste real life hours going back and forth on a trade that has to happen. Who else would be interested in AR? No one interested, less demand, lower price. A 2nd and a WR is a decent price. I offered #13 overall but while getting back the packers 3rd rd pick but was declined. 7 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: I tried to acquire a better WR, hasn't panned out yet. I traded a comp pick and a player who wasn't getting re-signed. A mid 2nd rounder for Rodgers? You traded a player that plays a vital role in the SF SB hopes. So you can run the wishbone 1 Quote
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 1 minute ago, NewEra said: Yes…. We were basically forced to trade. We just wanted to settle on something that both teams would be ok with. It’s a pretend exercise. No reason to waste real life hours going back and forth on a trade that has to happen. Who else would be interested in AR? No one interested, less demand, lower price. A 2nd and a WR is a decent price. I offered #13 overall but while getting back the packers 3rd rd pick but was declined. No worries...I got the better QB anyways Quote
NeverOutNick Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 In this mock draft environment, should the ravens be allowed to offer up Lamar Jackson in a trade with the prerequisite that he signs his franchise tag? 1 Quote
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said: In this mock draft environment, should the ravens be allowed to offer up Lamar Jackson in a trade with the prerequisite that he signs his franchise tag? Have you asked his mother if it's ok? 6 minutes ago, NewEra said: Yes…. We were basically forced to trade. We just wanted to settle on something that both teams would be ok with. It’s a pretend exercise. No reason to waste real life hours going back and forth on a trade that has to happen. Who else would be interested in AR? No one interested, less demand, lower price. A 2nd and a WR is a decent price. I offered #13 overall but while getting back the packers 3rd rd pick but was declined. You traded a player that plays a vital role in the SF SB hopes. So you can run the wishbone You're gonna be wishing that you had my players when we're getting our feet fitted for Super Bowl toe rings 1 1 Quote
Patrick Duffy Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 1 minute ago, Virgil said: We've done it once before when their was a consensus player that everyone wanted. However, I don't see that player this year. I based it off the vibe of discussion If a trade doesn't happen before the Bills pick, I have zero issues putting an option for a Broncos trade for Jeudy Ok I know quite a few were interested in Jeudy so not sure if you would consider him a consensus type or not, but if someone were to bring it to your attention, I assume you'd do a poll or does it take a certain amount of request for a poll? Quote
mannc Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Sherlock Holmes said: Huh? That's what I'm talking about... We're not communicating clearly. My original statement was that the Pack would not trade Rodgers for only a second round pick and Corey Davis...I'm not sure why you took issue with that statement. Edited April 6, 2023 by mannc Quote
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 Just now, mannc said: We're not communicating clearly. My original statement was that the Pack would not trade Rodgers for only a second round pick and Corey Davis...I'm not sure why you took issue with that statement. I didn't, I was agreeing with you lol 1 Quote
Virgil Posted April 6, 2023 Author Posted April 6, 2023 9 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said: In this mock draft environment, should the ravens be allowed to offer up Lamar Jackson in a trade with the prerequisite that he signs his franchise tag? I just looked it up. Since Lamar hasn't signed the tag, he is not eligible to be traded yet. If there's something out there that proves it wrong, please post it Quote
Patrick Duffy Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 4 minutes ago, mannc said: We're not communicating clearly. My original statement was that the Pack would not trade Rodgers for only a second round pick and Corey Davis...I'm not sure why you took issue with that statement. I don't know about that since Rodgers is basically at the end of his career. I mean what would you guess, 1 or 2 seasons left at most? Also seems like Packers are tired of his ***** at this point also and I'm sure Rodgers is tired of theirs.... A 2nd round pick number 42 or 43 along with a Corey Davis WR could definitely be possible that Packers could do imo Quote
mannc Posted April 6, 2023 Posted April 6, 2023 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said: I don't know about that since Rodgers is basically at the end of his career. I mean what would you guess, 1 or 2 seasons left at most? Also seems like Packers are tired of his ***** at this point also and I'm sure Rodgers is tired of theirs.... A 2nd round pick number 42 or 43 along with a Corey Davis WR could definitely be possible that Packers could do imo I don’t think so. Rodgers is still a top 5 or 6 QB. If the Packers trade him, they are essentially taking a powder in 2023…I wouldn’t be surprised if they want 2 firsts Edited April 6, 2023 by mannc Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.