Rigotz Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 All across the message board I keep seeing folks talk about Jack Campbell. Why is nobody talking about Drew Sanders? Same position, better fit, significantly better player … is the assumption that he won’t fall to us? 7 1 1 1 Quote
Drew21PA Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 Like them both Drew has a mean streak I love from my linebackers like Milano 2 Quote
Low Positive Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 the posters on TBD tend to skew older. They want a white LB with a mullet and a neck pad, like it was 1995. Edmunds was a modern LB and was hated here because he is a coverage LB and not Shane Conlin. 1 6 6 5 2 15 3 11 Quote
Augie Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said: the posters on TBD tend to skew older. They want a white LB with a mullet and a neck pad, like it was 1995. Edmunds was a modern LB and was hated here because he is a coverage LB and not Shane Conlin. You had me at mullet. 😋 1 5 Quote
gobills404 Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 (edited) Because he’s not a significantly better player. He’s played 1 season of off ball LB after playing on the edge at Alabama and because of that he isn’t nearly as instinctive as Campbell. Sanders also had a terrible 20% missed tackle this rate this past season. He may have a higher ceiling than Campbell but the only thing he’s really better at right now is blitzing. Edited April 2, 2023 by gobills404 5 6 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 Sanders is apparently not a good tackler. Tackling is already a weakness of our defense so I'd rather not add someone else with the same issue. And I worry when I read things like this on his NFL.com scouting report: "Inconsistent in reading his keys for misdirection." "Some change-of-direction delay in coverage." "I think there is more value to drafting him as a pass rusher than a linebacker.” It reminds me too much of Edmunds coming out. I like Campbell because he's instinctual and tackles well. 5 2 Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Rigotz said: All across the message board I keep seeing folks talk about Jack Campbell. Why is nobody talking about Drew Sanders? Same position, better fit, significantly better player … is the assumption that he won’t fall to us? From what I can gather: Sanders - Better athlete, 1 year starter, very raw, poor tackler, great blitzer. Campbell - Better size, much more consistent, elite intangibles and leadership. Sanders has the higher ceiling, Campbell has a higher floor. I do feel one of these two will be the pick at 27. Edited April 2, 2023 by TheyCallMeAndy 4 3 2 Quote
LyndonvilleBill Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 14 minutes ago, Augie said: You had me at mullet. 😋 And lost me at White.🤮 1 1 1 2 Quote
mrags Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 Because he’s small/undersized as a MLB in this league. 233? Hell get blocked out of the play by small WRs at that size. Quote
Snappysnackcakes Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 34 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said: the posters on TBD tend to skew older. They want a white LB with a mullet and a neck pad, like it was 1995. Edmunds was a modern LB and was hated here because he is a coverage LB and not Shane Conlin. If you’re gonna put nonsense like this out here, at least spell the name correctly. It’s Shane Conlan. And he would do well in today’s NFL. BTW, he never had a mullet. 3 3 Quote
delirious Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 37 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said: the posters on TBD tend to skew older. They want a white LB with a mullet and a neck pad, like it was 1995. Edmunds was a modern LB and was hated here because he is a coverage LB and not Shane Conlin. Most sane Edmunds mental gymnast 3 minutes ago, Snappysnackcakes said: If you’re gonna put nonsense like this out here, at least spell the name correctly. It’s Shane Conlan. And he would do well in today’s NFL. BTW, he never had a mullet. Right? Shane Conlan would have actually been a beast. Unlike Edmunds. 1 Quote
John from Riverside Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 Didn’t our last linebacker play outside in college? Could’ve swore I heard that Tremaine played outside. Quote
TOboy Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 18 minutes ago, mrags said: Because he’s small/undersized as a MLB in this league. 233? Hell get blocked out of the play by small WRs at that size. He’s 6’4, pretty sure they can add 7-10 lbs in the weight room. There’s posters here convinced Bernard is the answer, he’s SMALL. Just now, Motorin' said: What about Trenton Simpson? Personally really like him as an option. He’s played more OLB and isn’t huge either, but damn he’s an explosive athlete. 2 3 Quote
frostbitmic Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 After watching runners bounce off our defenders attempts at tackling last year, I'd lean towards taking the sure tackler. 2 Quote
Doc Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 2 minutes ago, frostbitmic said: After watching runners bounce off our defenders attempts at tackling last year, I'd lean towards taking the sure tackler. And after watching a great athlete with questionable instincts, I'll go with the guy with lesser athleticism and good instincts. 3 9 Quote
nosejob Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 NFLDraftbuzz has Sanders rank at no. 70. I have been using draftbuzz in my posts because it's a completely different look at players than fans/main stream media and is pretty thought provoking. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 Both would be overdrafted at 27, so...pretty much the same. 1 1 1 1 Quote
mrags Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 30 minutes ago, TOboy said: He’s 6’4, pretty sure they can add 7-10 lbs in the weight room. There’s posters here convinced Bernard is the answer, he’s SMALL. Personally really like him as an option. He’s played more OLB and isn’t huge either, but damn he’s an explosive athlete. I’m not a fan of Bernard either. He was a terrible pick at the time. but to think Sanders could just add weight is false hope. At least on this team. Epenesa lost 40lbs when he came here. Rousseau hasn’t gained a pound since he was drafted. At least the Bills have him at 266 and that’s the same exact weight he was drafted at. Oliver certainly hasn’t gained any weight. Listed at 287 currently on the roster and was drafted at 287. I’ll give you Edmunds. He was listed at 236 when he was drafted and now weighs in at 250. So he gained 14lbs. However he still gets bounced out of plays by undersized blockers. Gets lost in the mayhem on the line. Always been a huge issue with what separated him from being just a good LB to a great LB imo. Maybe it’s just his play style. either way, I don’t want another undersized LB that gets pushed around in the pile. But chances are, with this coaching staff and FO, that’s exactly why we’re going to get. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.