Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

The new free agency structure appeared in early 1993 as I recall, and the first thing that new structure did was kick the Bills organization in the face and then follow that up with a curb-stomping. I'm talking about the Will Wolford contract shenanigans. That was ridiculous.

 

 

Yep and the first thing that went around the league were the offensive lines.........which made quick hitting west coast offenses almost a necessity........which allowed the DC's to bring out concepts like "zone blitz" that would have been laughable against say, the 1983 Redskins offense.

 

Imagine if this board existed back when UFA first started and the NFL immediately awarded the Cardinals a 1st round pick for not even attempting to re-sign safety Tim McDonald........and initially gave the Bills nothing for losing stud LT Will Wolford who they had tried to retain but were duped by an escalator clause that required Wolford to be the highest paid offensive player on the team.    A year later the Bills got a measly 2nd round comp pick for a stud LT out of that fiasco.   TSW freaks out about 3rd round comp picks now. 🤣

 

Incidentally, there was an Ed Kilgore thread on here recently.   Anyone who feels bad for those old farts who are casualties of the internet and 24 hour news cycle needs to remember that those days SUCKED when it came to following the league.    Nobody talked about that Wolford BS at all.    There was a passing mention that the Bills would get some kind of comp pick next year then nothing in the media thereafter.    It got close to that draft and there was still nothing.   So I called Ed up at his desk and he was pissed that I asked him to look into and mention such an inconsequential issue.   He had no clue about it.  Imagine the local news not knowing if the Bills were going to be awarded a draft pick now.  😆

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Shocked 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

We took a running back in the second round just like we did Thurman 😄

 

Cook looked pretty good to me in his limited roll last season and I feel he can easily perform as good and likely better than Devin

in the roll of the 60% snap RB.  I think he is more explosive and has a higher ceiling than Singletary had.  

 

With Damien Harris as a true compliment with different skills and running style, I'm actually pretty hyped with what the backfield can

do this coming year.  Sprinkle in some specific plays designed for Hines and I don't see a problem.

 

It's up to Dorsey to dovetail the playcalling to maximize their skills and potential.  That's with both the passing and running games.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

The one player answer is obvious.........get him a star WR2.

 

Another SB has passed and another team that won without a star RB.........it was a "trend" 18-20 years ago(when teams started going to split carry backfields)..........now it's blatantly obvious that you don't need or even want a star RB taking the ball out of your stud passers hands.

 

McBeane should really clam up about Allen running too much if they don't intend to get him a better receiving corps............only an idiot thinks that Josh Allen running is a result of the RB's not producing.........he doesn't run on run downs he runs on passing downs...........he runs because the receivers aren't open, are dropping passes or the pass pro broke down.

Totally agree. That's why these knuckleheads failed Josh by not getting him a dynamic OL.  The OL should've been #1 on the grocery list.  Disappointments like Ford, Saffold,  Brown & Quessenberry only validate how Beane is locked in to desperate dumpster dives or guys from an "OL powerhouse"🤭 like Northern Iowa?

.....and yes Josh deserves better than Gabe (Wr3) Davis.  They somehow thought grabbing Diggs was all they had to do?  Stupid and irresponsible strategy. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


everything here. 
 

jim is bringing answers from his career but it’s a drastically different era. 

 

Not really, it's just the trend that everyone is following. 

 

Kyle Shanahan features his RBs and is successful doing it. He just needs someone a little better than Garopollo at the helm. 

 

I prefer his offensive scheme over anything I've seen here in the past 5 years.

Edited by Chicken Boo
  • Agree 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

Not really, it's just the trend that everyone is following. 

 

Kyle Shanahan features his RBs and is successful doing it. He just needs someone a little better than Garopollo at the helm. 

 

I prefer his offensive scheme over anything I've seen here in the past 5 years.

 

I agree completely,  but you have to keep the team full of talent, and to his credit he does.

 

Which is why he can't pay a QB, but his team isn't dependent on any one player.

 

Hard to duplicate though.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

Not really, it's just the trend that everyone is following. 

 

Kyle Shanahan features his RBs and is successful doing it. He just needs someone a little better than Garopollo at the helm. 

 

I prefer his offensive scheme over anything I've seen here in the past 5 years.

 

 Same as when the Pats went to 2 athletic TEs. No other team was doing it at the time and it worked because defenses weren't constructed to deal with it.  

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, BillsFan619 said:

Get a star RB.

 

I think most here would agree with JK’s statement about needing to take some pressure off of JA. But, there could be different opinions on how to most effectively make that happen.

 

Many here this off-season have wanted us to get a star RB and many here have wanted us to get a star #2WR (or #1bWR).

 

While both pieces would be nice, which is a more vital piece in your opinion to taking more pressure off of Josh and getting us a Super Bowl victory?

 

JK obviously knows offense. Because he played QB, if there’s anyone that knows what will take pressure off of a QB, it’s him. Is he right, is the more vital piece a star RB?

 

On the other hand, JK played in an offense from a different era where the RB position was a lot more important. Is the more vital piece a star #2WR?

 

Thoughts?

 

If you want to hear JK’s thoughts, click on play. Go Bills!

 

 

Respect his opinion, but the league has changed since the no-huddle K-gun with Thurman Thomas.  Super Bowl winning teams of the last decade have not had nor needed pro-bowlers at the RB position.

 

The best way to help Josh is through more weapons at receiver, a much improved o-line, and smart play calling.  

Posted
11 minutes ago, BillsClinton said:

James Cook was quietly a very good multi-purpose back, but we basically never used him.

 

 

 

After watching that I just want to say that all of the "experts" here who beat the drum that Cook can't run between the tackles were wrong.

His vision makes him good at that and I don't want to hear it anymore.

 

Looking forward to his first season as the top bill RB!

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Totally agree. That's why these knuckleheads failed Josh by not getting him a dynamic OL.  The OL should've been #1 on the grocery list.  Disappointments like Ford, Saffold,  Brown & Quessenberry only validate how Beane is locked in to desperate dumpster dives or guys from an "OL powerhouse"🤭 like Northern Iowa?

.....and yes Josh deserves better than Gabe (Wr3) Davis.  They somehow thought grabbing Diggs was all they had to do?  Stupid and irresponsible strategy. 

 

 

I'm more in on the playmaker aspect because the unfortunate reality is that you can't keep offensive lines together.   There is a reason that there aren't any memorable offensive line driven teams in the past 20+ years.

 

The closest thing to one is the Patriots........and while they had maybe a HOF level line coach they were more a product of a QB who got the ball out lightning quick than they were some kind of dominant blocking unit.  

 

And that's it.

 

We just saw a tremendous OL in Philly last season........but two years from now they could be trash(like Tampa last year versus their SB unit).

 

 QB and receiver combo's can be kept together for long stretches........making them all the more worthwhile to invest in.

 

On the OL the clear formula for not being undermined by that unit seems to be a good LT and two solid guards gets the job done.   C and RT can be JAGs or even a bit less as blockers.  

Edited by BADOLBILZ
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Different version of football being played now.  Respect Jim’s opinion but they have a good set of backs.  A better O line and up grading WR and TE will make Allen much more effective.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

I'm more in on the playmaker aspect because the unfortunate reality is that you can't keep offensive lines together.   There is a reason that there aren't any memorable offensive line driven teams in the past 20+ years.

 

The closest thing to one is the Patriots........and while they had maybe a HOF level line coach they were more a product of a QB who got the ball out lightning quick than they were some kind of dominant blocking unit.  

 

And that's it.

 

We just saw a tremendous OL in Philly last season........but two years from now they could be trash(like Tampa last year versus their SB unit).

 

 QB and receiver combo's can be kept together for long stretches........making them all the more worthwhile to invest in.

 

On the OL the clear formula for not being undermined by that unit seems to be a good LT and two solid guards gets the job done.   C and RT can be JAGs or even a bit less as blockers.  

What do you think of the FA guards they signed? This is apparently a particularly weak draft. I doubt they are going to find a LT. Where would you concentrate the day one and two picks?

Posted
53 minutes ago, Southern_Bills said:

 

I agree completely,  but you have to keep the team full of talent, and to his credit he does.

 

Which is why he can't pay a QB, but his team isn't dependent on any one player.

 

Hard to duplicate though.

SF has a different approach for sure.  But give me the Diggs/ Hopkins and gang - throw it all over the  yard and blow teams out approach all day long.  Much more exciting.

Posted
3 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

The year after Wolford left, Thomas went from being a guy who averaged nearly 5 ypc every season between 1988-1992 to a guy averaging 3.7 in 1993. And his yards per reception, which had always been between 10.2 an 11.6 up to that point, shrank to 8.1. It was the line. Wolford was a HOF quality LT who left after 1992, and in 1993 both Hull and Ritcher missed games too. Thomas went from being elite to a decent player. They made the SB that season not because of the offense but because the defense generated 47 turnovers. To be fair, the Bills' line steamrolled the Chiefs D in the championship game, but that's because the Chiefs' d-line was made up of pass rushers. As people may recall, Derrick Thomas was benched midway through that game.

 

Anyway, Kelly is a HOF player, but I think the line is a lot more important than the RB (not that RB quality doesn't matter).

Escalator clause 😠

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Billz4ever said:

Respect his opinion, but the league has changed since the no-huddle K-gun with Thurman Thomas.  Super Bowl winning teams of the last decade have not had nor needed pro-bowlers at the RB position

Pro Bowlers... No, but threats in the running game. 

Posted (edited)

When things aren’t going as you hoped, you need to be able to run the ball. Instead the Bills have been doubling down on the hero ball passing game which has not always worked out too well.it puts it all on JA which is maybe what JK is saying

.

Edited by bmur66
Posted

No way in hell. I’m still recovering from the CJ Spiller disaster. Build the freakin O-Line even if they have to reach a little bit, maybe even trade down. Protect your 100 million $ QB. Buffalos weapons are adequate enough to get it done. Watch everyone improve when you give Allen some decent protection, watch the running game vastly improve. I can’t believe anyone would even consider wasting a 1st rounder in a RB. Actually it blows my mind. This isn’t the 90s anymore, Jim. Unless there’s a Saquon Barkley level prospect then I would jump on board, but there isn’t. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...