Andy1 Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 Michael Cohen went to prison for tax fraud and campaign finance fraud. He has stated that he was coordinating with, acting at the direction of and for the benefit of Trump through his actions. It would seem logical that Trump would then be charged for violations of the law in the same matter. 1
BillsFanNC Posted April 4, 2023 Author Posted April 4, 2023 11 minutes ago, aristocrat said: your TDS is truely something to be ignored FIFY. 1
ChiGoose Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 6 minutes ago, Andy1 said: Michael Cohen went to prison for tax fraud and campaign finance fraud. He has stated that he was coordinating with, acting at the direction of and for the benefit of Trump through his actions. It would seem logical that Trump would then be charged for violations of the law in the same matter. This kind of factual and logical statement has no business here on PPP. 2
aristocrat Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 On 3/30/2023 at 6:52 PM, Roundybout said: Justice is blind, and no one is above the law. Keeping elected officials untouchable by the law is something that happens in African nations. 100 percent. Biden been in public office for decades, uses his son to hide money in shady chinese and ukrainian business dealings and is the sitting president. but sure a guy paid his escort 100k is something we should totally give a ***** about.
SydneyBillsFan Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 (edited) From 23:30, Jesse Watters knocks it out of the ball park. What an embarrassment for Bragg, who should be spending less time at KFC, and more time locking up proper criminals. ADD - another Democrat debacle! Edited April 4, 2023 by SydneyBillsFan 2 1 1
Doc Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 16 minutes ago, aristocrat said: 100 percent. Biden been in public office for decades, uses his son to hide money in shady chinese and ukrainian business dealings and is the sitting president. but sure a guy paid his escort 100k is something we should totally give a ***** about. True, but remember this all started with the claim of a pee tape...
Tiberius Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 35 minutes ago, aristocrat said: your TDS is truely something to behold I;m not the one defending the traitor. Happy you are losing, though 17 minutes ago, aristocrat said: 100 percent. Biden been in public office for decades, uses his son to hide money in shady chinese and ukrainian business dealings and is the sitting president. but sure a guy paid his escort 100k is something we should totally give a ***** about. So dumb
B-Man Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 2 hours ago, SCBills said: Even CNN is struggling with this. Bragg is such a joke. The crime was Being Trump in the First Degree 😂 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted April 4, 2023 Author Posted April 4, 2023 This should blare at Mar a Lago all night long. 1 1
aristocrat Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I;m not the one defending the traitor. Happy you are losing, though So dumb when you have to attempt to imprison your political enemies you're not winning. 1
Doc Posted April 4, 2023 Posted April 4, 2023 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Like a teach in summer...
Roundybout Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 21 minutes ago, aristocrat said: when you have to attempt to imprison your political enemies you're not winning. Can I apply this to everything about Hillary Clinton circa 2010-present? 3
daz28 Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 13 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Can I apply this to everything about Hillary Clinton circa 2010-present? He was just kidding about lock her up. If she was indicted, Trump would have been non-stop tweeting about how unjust it was. I swear to God some people are just completely incapable of seeing hypocrisy. 2
B-Man Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 BACK to the Trump thread. Legal Experts Across the Political Spectrum Are Laughing at Alvin Bragg's Indictment of Donald Trump Nick Arama has had Alvin Bragg’s number for quite some time, predicting that the 34-count indictment would amount to charge stacking and that there could be nothing a serious lawyer would put their name to it. I wrote earlier that once we saw the indictment we knew why Alvin Bragg wanted it to be sealed as long as possible, and that according to one reporter who was in the courtroom Trump’s attorneys laughed when they read it. Trump’s attorney Joseph Tacopino seemed to confirm this with an answer during a press conference after the indictment: Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe called it “an indictment of Alvin Bragg” and said that “legitimate law schools will forever use this indictment to teach the concept of prosecutorial abuse of discretion.” Liberal Vox’s Ian Millhiser first admitted that the legal underpinnings are… “not great.” https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2023/04/04/legal-experts-across-the-political-spectrum-are-laughing-at-alvin-braggs-indictment-of-donald-trump-n726570 1 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 1 hour ago, LeviF said: Read the penal law. It’s not “conviction.” What's the "crime" in the indictment cited as being covered up? I don't see it. The DA's case is pure fantasy. 1 2
Commsvet11 Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 1 hour ago, yall said: You claimed to have read them already. They were linked and you quoted the post. Learn how to read. You might find something enlightening. Or at the very least you may be able to engage in rational discourse. The rationale discourse that you refuse to engage in. We all know your game you have accused me of not reading thinking you were billy badass and when you couldn’t refute my points after going back you accuse me of being illiterate and all it would take is a simple quotation but to avoid your embarrassment to the rest of the posters on here you are banking on them not noticing you can’t even post the smallest paragraph. Now either post the link and paragraph proving me wrong or STFU 2
ChiGoose Posted April 5, 2023 Posted April 5, 2023 7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: What's the "crime" in the indictment cited as being covered up? I don't see it. The DA's case is pure fantasy. Paragraph 7 of the statement of facts: ”During and in furtherance of his candidacy for President, the Defendant and others agreed to identify and suppress negative stories about him. Two parties to this agreement have admitted to committing illegal conduct in connection with the scheme. In August 2018, Lawyer A pleaded guilty to two federal crimes involving illegal campaign contributions, and subsequently served time in prison. In addition, in August 2018, American Media, Inc. (“AMI”), a media company that owned and published magazines and supermarket tabloids including the National Enquirer, admitted in a non-prosecution agreement that it made a payment to a source of a story to ensure that the source “did not publicize damaging allegations” about the Defendant “before the 2016 presidential election and thereby influence that election.”” So, violations of election laws.
Recommended Posts