Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Of all the hills, you chose this one to die on.........interesting 

 

Almost as if this troll moron isn't worth anyone's time or something. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

From @Big Blitz article:

 

Quote

Dr. Deanna Adkins, a transgender activist who runs the clinic, said this about her toddler trans paer expert declaration to a federal district court in North Carolina concerning H.B. 2 Adkins stated, “From a medical perspective, the appropriate determinant of sex is gender identity.”

 

Adkins argues that gender identity is not only the preferred basis for determining sex, but “the only medically supported determinant of sex.” Every other method is bad science, she claims:

 

“It is counter to medical science to use chromosomes, hormones, internal reproductive organs, external genitalia, or secondary sex characteristics to override gender identity for purposes of classifying someone as male or female.”

 

WOW

 

Doesn't sound like science to me.

 

I wonder if our resident Doctors @Doc or @redtail hawk think this sounds like science to them.

 

5 years ago this would have been a Saturday Night Live skit.

 

This stuff gets crazier every day.

 

And she's running the place.

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

From @Big Blitz article:

 

 

WOW

 

Doesn't sound like science to me.

 

I wonder if our resident Doctors @Doc or @redtail hawk think this sounds like science to them.

 

5 years ago this would have been a Saturday Night Live skit.

 

This stuff gets crazier every day.

 

And she's running the place.

 

@redtail hawk  may be an MD, and a quack at that, but please don't disparage actual scientists like myself by grouping that nut job in with us.

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
42 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

From @Big Blitz article:

 

 

WOW

 

Doesn't sound like science to me.

 

I wonder if our resident Doctors @Doc or @redtail hawk think this sounds like science to them.

 

5 years ago this would have been a Saturday Night Live skit.

 

This stuff gets crazier every day.

 

And she's running the place.

Still unexplained is the obsession of these medical "professionals" with children.  If an adult with the necessary maturity and self-awareness decides to make a decision for themselves that is their choice.  And nobody should interfere.  But this obsession with kids is psychotic.  And in many ways malicious.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, All_Pro_Bills said:

Still unexplained is the obsession of these medical "professionals" with children.  If an adult with the necessary maturity and self-awareness decides to make a decision for themselves that is their choice.  And nobody should interfere.  But this obsession with kids is psychotic.  And in many ways malicious.  

 

All of the above is true for those of us still living in a world where the sky is blue.

 

For the commies?  Not so much.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Still unexplained is the obsession of these medical "professionals" with children.  If an adult with the necessary maturity and self-awareness decides to make a decision for themselves that is their choice.  And nobody should interfere.  But this obsession with kids is psychotic.  And in many ways malicious.  

 

OH, so children should just be ignored? 

 

Once again, why are LGTBQ suicide rates so high?

 

Why are there so many closet cases? Especially... in the REPUBLICAN party?

 

?m=02&d=20070829&t=2&i=1374180&w=780&fh=

 

MMMMHMMM - Sweep it under the rug like a conservative.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, reddogblitz said:

From @Big Blitz article:

 

 

WOW

 

Doesn't sound like science to me.

 

I wonder if our resident Doctors @Doc or @redtail hawk think this sounds like science to them.

 

5 years ago this would have been a Saturday Night Live skit.

 

This stuff gets crazier every day.

 

And she's running the place.


That’s religion not science. There is nothing more unscientific than suggesting you can’t define a variable by a set of parameters. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Still unexplained is the obsession of these medical "professionals" with children.  If an adult with the necessary maturity and self-awareness decides to make a decision for themselves that is their choice.  And nobody should interfere.  But this obsession with kids is psychotic.  And in many ways malicious.  


And the lies about self harm

 

suicide rates among minors are skyrocketing.
 

Are these experts contending society is less trans tolerant now??

 

its an absurd argument 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

 

ANHEUSER-BUSCH KNOWS WHAT IT HAS TO DO TO MAKE THE PAIN STOP:

 

Bud Light fell into the same trap that many other brands fall into, thinking that the leftist perspective is the reigning perspective in our culture and, as such, allowed a woman who had no business being in charge of marketing for Bud Light in the first place to do something that Americans are clearly insulted by.

 

 

The CEO can claim “misinformation” about what’s going on and have confidence about the brand’s recovery all day. This isn’t just a reaction to “one can” with “one influencer” on it. This boycott is now a movement, and it doesn’t seem to be losing steam, at least not yet.

 

 

A-B is going to bear this scare for a very, very long time but it can begin the healing process by simply apologizing for what it did. It should come out and tell Americans that it’s sorry that it even gave the time of day to such a divisive influencer who represents something that is hurting people everywhere. It needs to come out and vow to never do it again.

 

What it chooses to do to make that apology seem more concrete is up to it, but no matter how you swing it, it needs to begin with “we’re sorry.”

 

 

The issue is that getting this apology will be like trying to pull a tooth from a very awake badger. While A-B’s customer base primarily consists of red-blooded Americans, they are afraid of the leftist machine just like every other corporation is. Apologizing for putting Mulvaney on the can will be a very loud choosing of sides and once they do, they can kiss their ESG score goodbye. This would be financially damaging to them in a very big way as various investment institutions that prioritize ESG obedience will suddenly not be interested in giving them the time of day.

 

 

If an Anheuser-Busch spokesman apologizes, the brand will take a brief, but huge hit on social media from the leftist mob — who don’t drink Bud Light, anyway — but the mob will quickly move on to something else to be angry about. In the meantime, as John Ekdahl tweets, “The biggest problem isn’t even the boycott; it’s that they’ve become a cultural punchline. This is now like having an AOL email address or driving a minivan. People avoid it so their buddies don’t rip them. Not sure how you fix that as a brand.”

 

https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2023/05/04/anheuser-busch-knows-what-it-has-to-do-to-make-the-pain-stop-n741178

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...