Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, daz28 said:
13 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Nope, I'm insisting it's been going on for millenia, and isn't a bigger problem now than it ever was.  The problem is that it's more open now, and the Kens/Karen's don't like it.  This is a fact, that can be documented in any thread

You are free to insist it’s been going on for millennia, but you would be wrong. This level BS is new to a generation of people that believe in things like gender fluidity and who get triggered over pronoun usage and “misgendering”. Thankfully this idiocy is receding around the globe with each passing day. Those advocating for men using the ladies room or competing in women’s sports will be seen as an anachronism before long. 
 

This has not been going on for millennia:

 

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2025/01/24/study-children-citing-distress-gender-dysphoria-rose-50-fold/4641737750506/

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Fox BAD. Men in women-only facilities good. Find a new routine. Again, this nonsense is why your preferred people are no longer in power. It’s not Fox that caused that. It’s people that think like you. 

 

Yup.

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

You are free to insist it’s been going on for millennia, but you would be wrong. This level BS is new to a generation of people that believe in things like gender fluidity and who get triggered over pronoun usage and “misgendering”. Thankfully this idiocy is receding around the globe with each passing day. Those advocating for men using the ladies room or competing in women’s sports will be seen as an anachronism before long. 
 

This has not been going on for millennia:

 

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2025/01/24/study-children-citing-distress-gender-dysphoria-rose-50-fold/4641737750506/

Well, imo it has been, and it's documented.  Do I agree the liberals push too hard on reluctant citizens? Yes.  

Posted
12 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


“I believe shady right wing sites to confirm my priors” 

 

- @JDHillFan

There is a factual error in the LoTT tweet. This lady does not go by first name Mike. It’s Mika. I hope that adds context. I was able to confirm that via CTV. 

 

You do, based on your priors, agree that this individual is a woman, correct? If not, why not?

Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

There is a factual error in the LoTT tweet. This lady does not go by first name Mike. It’s Mika. I hope that adds context. I was able to confirm that via CTV. 

 

You do, based on your priors, agree that this individual is a woman, correct? If not, why not?


Assuming this story is at all accurate and not rage bait for unemployed MAGA  folks, I don’t think feigning being transgender counts as actually being trans, no 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Assuming this story is at all accurate and not rage bait for unemployed MAGA  folks, I don’t think feigning being transgender counts as actually being trans, no 

CTV is part of Canadian reliable mainstream media. Mika/Mike is real. Nice to see you set MAGA aside and note your concern for the victims of Mika/Mike. Oh, wait.
 

Someday maybe you will be kind enough to tell us what the dividing line is for when “transwomen are women, cope and seethe” is in effect. Sometimes it’s hard to know. I suspect you don’t even know. 
 

One more brief question on “transwomen are women”…How so?

Posted
9 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

CTV is part of Canadian reliable mainstream media. Mika/Mike is real. Nice to see you set MAGA aside and note your concern for the victims of Mika/Mike. Oh, wait.
 

Someday maybe you will be kind enough to tell us what the dividing line is for when “transwomen are women, cope and seethe” is in effect. Sometimes it’s hard to know. I suspect you don’t even know. 
 

One more brief question on “transwomen are women”…How so?


I don’t click LibsofTikTok links because I refuse to give that psychopath money from her blue check. 
 

So, I googled this person’s name. There is absolutely no result on CTV News for them. The only results were for Reduxx (a known far-right crackpot) and a few Twitter accounts, some of which were in Spanish. 
 

Sounds like you’ve been duped again. Ask yourself why you’re so ready to lap up propaganda? Sad!

Posted
6 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


I don’t click LibsofTikTok links because I refuse to give that psychopath money from her blue check. 
 

So, I googled this person’s name. There is absolutely no result on CTV News for them. The only results were for Reduxx (a known far-right crackpot) and a few Twitter accounts, some of which were in Spanish. 
 

Sounds like you’ve been duped again. Ask yourself why you’re so ready to lap up propaganda? Sad!

Again, as with the entirety of last year, you are wrong. Who could have imagined? 
 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/man-charged-with-assaulting-4-women-at-edmonton-shelter/

 

You probably looked for Mike. Idiot. 
 

Now tell us how you still got this right. Should be fun. 
 

 

Posted
Just now, JDHillFan said:

Again, as with the entirety of last year, you are wrong. Who could have imagined? 
 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/man-charged-with-assaulting-4-women-at-edmonton-shelter/

 

You probably looked for Mike. Idiot. 
 

Now tell us how you still got this right. Should be fun. 
 

 


Ah, so I did! Good. Thank you for providing that. 
 

 

Now, where in that article does it say anything about this person being Trans?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Ah, so I did! Good. Thank you for providing that. 
 

 

Now, where in that article does it say anything about this person being Trans?

It doesn’t. That’s where discernment comes in and that’s something you do not have in your toolbox. That’s not to say you aren’t a tool. Do you really believe reliable mainstream Canadian media would report that angle? Truly? Think, kid. MIKA/MIKE. Same facility as women. Think. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


Assuming this story is at all accurate and not rage bait for unemployed MAGA  folks, I don’t think feigning being transgender counts as actually being trans, no 

I need an explanation on what "feigning transgender" means- I have had students who were "trans" for a couple of months, were they feigning? 

Posted
22 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

It doesn’t. That’s where discernment comes in and that’s something you do not have in your toolbox. That’s not to say you aren’t a tool. Do you really believe reliable mainstream Canadian media would report that angle? Truly? Think, kid. MIKA/MIKE. Same facility as women. Think. 

 

 


Yes, sure. It’s all one big old conspiracy.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Yes, sure. It’s all one big old conspiracy.

Hardly. It’s not news that Canadian media has an extremely liberal slant. To disagree with that is foolish. If you want to deny Mika’s womanhood, that’s on you. Just surprised by the inconsistency. 
 

Will you answer this simple question regarding your belief that “transwomen are women” - how so?

Posted
13 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Hardly. It’s not news that Canadian media has an extremely liberal slant. To disagree with that is foolish. If you want to deny Mika’s womanhood, that’s on you. Just surprised by the inconsistency. 
 

Will you answer this simple question regarding your belief that “transwomen are women” - how so?


Because gender expression is separate from biological sex.

Posted
Just now, Roundybout said:


Because gender expression is separate from biological sex.

So they aren’t actually women and it’s all based on feelings? Why didn’t you just say that? Could have saved a lot of coping and seething. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

So they aren’t actually women and it’s all based on feelings? Why didn’t you just say that? Could have saved a lot of coping and seething. 


They are absolutely women. I know this is challenging for you but I promise we can get you through it. 

×
×
  • Create New...