Transsurrection: All the documented events that aren't happening. TRANS WOMEN ARE MEN

[Tommy Callahan]

25 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

What say you @BillStime @ChiGoose @SectionC3?

 

BTW I had to screenshot this tweet because Twitter has disabled the embedding function for this tweet specifically. 

 

I wonder why?

 

 

Cause it would get one banned from social media for sharing porn?  child porn to boot.

 

 

Just now, SectionC3 said:

What I say is that you’re into some pretty lurid stuff.  I also say that I’m still waiting for a response to the point that you’re pro-junk check before kids play high school sports.  Sick.  But that’s MAGA for you.  

Aw, someone never played any sports growing up. or you would know a physical is a requirement.

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

Cause it would get one banned from social media for sharing porn?  child porn to boot.

 

 

Aw, someone never played any sports growing up. or you would know a physical is a requirement.

Interesting.  MAGA begins to unwittingly turn on itself.  Chris Farley has accused that other guy of sharing child porn.  Outstanding.  Let’s see MAGA wiggle out of this one. 

[BillStime]

28 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

What say you @BillStime @ChiGoose @SectionC3?

 

BTW I had to screenshot this tweet because Twitter has disabled the embedding function for this tweet specifically. 

 

I wonder why?

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

@SectionC3 tells us that Florida is burning this book with child porn it.

 

and we're into lurid stuff?

 

Can't make it up. Except commies gonna commie.

 

[aristocrat]

9 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

What I say is that you’re into some pretty lurid stuff.  I also say that I’m still waiting for a response to the point that you’re pro-junk check before kids play high school sports.  Sick.  But that’s MAGA for you.  

 

So you think that book is appropriate?  Just want to clear that up

[BillsFanNC]

 

Just now, aristocrat said:

 

So you think that book is appropriate?  Just want to clear that up

 

No. He thinks that WE are into lurid stuff for showing images from a pornographic book that parents don't want on the shelves of their public school library for kids to see.

 

 

Standard commie stuff.

 

[BillStime]

It’s nice to see the cult try to find common ground on issues that are obviously not age appropriate for all. 
 

You gotta love the gotcha games these degenerates like to play.

 

Meanwhile, let’s totally ignore students getting their heads blown off and focus on the real issues.

 

#soMUCHwinning 

 

 

[SectionC3]

14 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

@SectionC3 tells us that Florida is burning this book with child porn it.

 

and we're into lurid stuff?

 

Can't make it up. Except commies gonna commie.

 

This is nonsensical. Even for you.  That’s saying something. 

[BillStime]

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

This is nonsensical. Even for you.  That’s saying something. 

Is it? You know what they say about desperate times.

[SectionC3]

 

26 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Cause it would get one banned from social media for sharing porn?  child porn to boot.

 

 

Aw, someone never played any sports growing up. or you would know a physical is a requirement.

 

It is not for every sport.  But if you want to have a junk check before a child plays a sport like bowling, or golf, or tennis, or swimming, or track, that’s on you.  And, you’ve overlooked the point that the physical is not conducted immediately before competition.  Between the time of the physical and the time of the competition something with respect to the examinee’s condition could change.  So your junk check position really is that you think that junk should be examined before each competition.  Sick.  Very sick. 

Edited May 2, 2023 by SectionC3

[BillsFanNC]

Commies:

 

Its sexual harassment to share, with another adult, images from a pornographic "kids" book that parents want removed from school libraries.

 

Also, you're a fascist book burning transphobe if you don't allow kids access to the very same book.

 

 

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

Is it? You know what they say about desperate times.

Seriously.  Usually that guy just writes a bunch of marginally comprehensible gibberish.  His most recent post is more deluded and desperate than normal.  These people are all tied up in knots - accusing each other of sharing child porn, worried about junk checks for children.  It’s sick.  

3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Commies:

 

Its sexual harassment to share, with another adult, images from a pornographic "kids" book that parents want removed from school libraries.

 

Also, you're a fascist book burning transphobe if you don't allow kids access to the very same book.

 

 

Where’s Chris Farley when you need him?  Hopefully not in that van by the river.  Now his pal Bills Fan NC is sharing more of what Mr. Chris Farley previously characterized as child porn.  Our lonely eyes tun to you, Mr. Chris Farley, for comment on this turn of events. 

[All_Pro_Bills]

27 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

Everyone has their obsession.  Why are self-identifying progressives obsessed with sexualizing somebody else's young children and then presenting adults that drive and support this obsession as victims while automatically demonizing people objecting whenever there's any push back?    

[SectionC3]

3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Everyone has their obsession.  Why are self-identifying progressives obsessed with sexualizing somebody else's young children and then presenting adults that drive and support this obsession as victims while automatically demonizing people objecting whenever there's any push back?    

I think what’s really happening here is that moderate, intelligent people (like BillsTime) are saying that we shouldn’t have sexually explicit materials in school.  We should not, however, ban literature based on point of view, or opinion, or topic area, simply because a portion of the population disagrees with the non-explicit subject matter.  

 

It’s not a difficult concept.  Unless you’re MAGA.  

[aristocrat]

17 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I think what’s really happening here is that moderate, intelligent people (like BillsTime) are saying that we shouldn’t have sexually explicit materials in school.  We should not, however, ban literature based on point of view, or opinion, or topic area, simply because a portion of the population disagrees with the non-explicit subject matter.  

 

It’s not a difficult concept.  Unless you’re MAGA.  

moderately intelligent is not how anyone would describe billstime 

[BillStime]

46 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Everyone has their obsession.  Why are self-identifying progressives obsessed with sexualizing somebody else's young children and then presenting adults that drive and support this obsession as victims while automatically demonizing people objecting whenever there's any push back?    

There are bigger issues in this country - like kids getting their heads blown to pieces - that should be addressed before the social media manufactured culture wars that are generated to specifically distract YOU from the BIGGER issues.

 

I don’t care to get into the weeds of what books hurt your feelings - ESPECIALLY when everyone knows what is and is not age appropriate.

 

Now go whine more those books! 
 

Hustle 

 

 

Edited May 2, 2023 by BillStime

[BillsFanNC]

20 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

moderately intelligent is not how anyone would describe billstime 

 

If you weren't certain that @SectionC3 was trolling before, you are now.

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

36 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

we shouldn’t have sexually explicit materials in school.  

Why isn’t this the answer-  Full stop end of story? 
 

The extremists can warp their own tribes minds however they want at home. Both sides need to stop attempting to mainstream their religious or anti religious ideologies.

 

how about some math and science materials in school??  

27 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

moderately intelligent is not how anyone would describe billstime 

Definitely a hoax 

[All_Pro_Bills]

11 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I think what’s really happening here is that moderate, intelligent people (like BillsTime) are saying that we shouldn’t have sexually explicit materials in school.  We should not, however, ban literature based on point of view, or opinion, or topic area, simply because a portion of the population disagrees with the non-explicit subject matter.  

 

It’s not a difficult concept.  Unless you’re MAGA.  

That's seems like a reasonable position but my understanding is literature being "banned" is based on it being accessible by children and not on the basis or belief its unsuitable for adults.  Correct me if I'm wrong. 

 

I also don't see this as a "MAGA" specific issue.  Parents of children across the political landscape don't want their children exposed to adult and sexually explicit materials.  That seems reasonable too.  Saying its MAGA sounds like an attempt to marginalize objections.

 

 

 

[Pokebball]

12 hours ago, BillStime said:

Sure - whatever helps you sleep at night while kids are forced to expose their genitals - sick phucks 

Isn't that what we both do? You see things thru your lens to placate you as well. But instead of respecting my pro woman opinion, you call me a sick !@#$. Bravo!

Edited May 2, 2023 by Pokebball