GunnerBill Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: It says "up to" doesn't that mean the AAV is lower? I mean the "up to" could mean heavily incentivised. That is fair. 1 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: Yea the void years are a result of covid as much as anything. That screwed the cap for a couple of years and teams are still digging their way out of it a bit. I think they will reduce again in time but the last 2/3 offseasons everyone has been using them. Even traditional cash to cap teams. Totally agree. I believe we are seeing some of that in this year's FAs. Not near as many huge signings. It's adjusting slowly but surely. One thing a lot of fans don't see is the math behind all of this. Restructuring and void years can be a great tool (I believe Beane is doing a very good job with that) BUT when you get to losing too much cap through void years it takes away "dollar for dollar" in the current season. Beane, for all his moves only lost $3.25M in void dead cap this season. That is pretty good for a team with a vet-signed QB. 1 1 Quote
BillsShredder83 Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: It says "up to" doesn't that mean the AAV is lower? Id assume so. That said, I LOVE him at $4.6 lol would prefer it Quote
Warcodered Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Okay I like him less at $4.6m AAV. Everything I saw all said the 1 year $3m that's the only thing I saw that I thought might line up with whatever that tweet I was replying to might be about. With Beane though it's always best to just wait and see how the contract actually is because it's usually something different anyways. Quote
ColoradoBills Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: I mean the "up to" could mean heavily incentivised. That is fair. Yes. If the incentives are "dressed games", I can see that and have no problem with it. 1 Quote
HenryJones Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 This signing sucks! (Money can be better spent, elsewhere) 3 1 3 Quote
HappyDays Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 1 hour ago, Virgil said: Love it. Bring back Lawson on the same deal They have offered Lawson a vet minimum deal. He's waiting to see if he gets offered something better. 1 Quote
msw2112 Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 A team can't have all-pro players (and all-pro salaries) at every position and every backup position. Teams need reliable, affordable veteran depth players. Phillips, when healthy, is at least that, if not an effective starter who generates good push inside. Good signing. 2 Quote
MJS Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: They have offered Lawson a vet minimum deal. He's waiting to see if he gets offered something better. Strange that other teams don't see the value in him. He is a good backup. Quote
HappyDays Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 46 minutes ago, papazoid said: PFF grades out of 127 #20 daquan #43 oliver #83 settle #98 phillips Phillips is quite a bit better than Settle when healthy. Problem is he wasn't healthy most of the season. PFF doesn't factor that into their grades. 1 3 1 Quote
Warcodered Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 Just now, MJS said: Strange that other teams don't see the value in him. He is a good backup. He's played his best football with the Bills. 2 Quote
Beck Water Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said: I hope that's an "up to" $3M Quote
Nitro Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 Good to have him back. Big run stopper in the middle. He helps Oliver by taking two blockers on. 1 1 Quote
MJS Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 Just now, Nitro said: Good to have him back. Big run stopper in the middle. He helps Oliver by taking two blockers on. Hmm. I think he is pretty suspect in run defense. He is more of a pass rusher and havoc creator. 1 4 1 Quote
Dr. Who Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 45 minutes ago, Herb Nightly said: Beane won't ' go all offense in draft. Most of the DTs are on expiring contracts. Secondary depth was challenged last year and you can't have too many corners in the AFC. I would also like an OLB/Edge to back up Von. I think maybe you just outed yourself, Sean. 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 1 hour ago, SCBills said: Glad to have him back. He’s definitely the best option we have for the money we seem willing to pay. Interesting DT room. Four DT’s. None under contract for ‘24. Room is deep enough that drafting a DT doesn’t seem necessary - but if they do, given our future DT look, are we carrying 5 active DT’s on the 53 all year? Good question. We carried 9 DLmen last season before Von Miller was hurt (I'm pretty sure), 5 DE and 4 DT. So maybe this season we would carry 4 DE and 5 DT if we draft one? I expect to see Beane negotiate an extension of DaQuan Jones after the draft, and he's talked about being unable to re-sign Edmunds due to needing money to re-signing Ed Oliver and Gabe Davis. Don't know what we'll see there. Quote
NC-billsfan! Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 Great signing! His shoulder will be better next year, he’s a handful when healthy. Now we need him in an interview. “Shaq, sign the damn contract!” 3 Quote
Beck Water Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 3 minutes ago, MJS said: Hmm. I think he is pretty suspect in run defense. He is more of a pass rusher and havoc creator. He can be sound in run defense. He's perfectly capable of it. It's a choice with him, like Allen passing up the short chain-mover for the lower percentage deep bomb. In his first go-around with Buffalo, he tended to sacrifice run gap integrity in favor of getting a jump in pass D. Last year he was mostly better, though I saw Edmunds chewing his ass a few times. That would be a good question - with Edmunds gone, who will keep him on task? 2 1 Quote
Bruffalo Posted March 29, 2023 Posted March 29, 2023 20 minutes ago, HenryJones said: This signing sucks! (Money can be better spent, elsewhere) I'll bite. Who are you going to get for 3 million (which is probably incentive heavy) that is better for the scheme? 3 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.