mannc Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 3 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: Un. Nevada Wait, did you really post this without knowing what school he’s from? 1 Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted March 27, 2023 Author Posted March 27, 2023 Just now, MrEpsYtown said: Interesting guy. But he's like the thrift shop version of Trenton Simpson. Simpson does everything Henley does, has more polish, is bigger and faster, and 2 years younger. so More Polished I agree. Bigger? Faster? Wrong on bigger. 1 inch taller but my man has the longer arms. He may be faster but not quicker. not close Quote
mrags Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: He’s more of a Milano type. That’s funny. That’s exactly why I’ve thought of just about every single LB in this draft not named Sewell or Campbell. Quote
boyst Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 13 minutes ago, mannc said: I just read that he’s from Washington State, not a “small school”. compared to even a west coast UCLA, USC it's small but compared to the big ten, acc, sec schools - yes. those dudes are battle tested. you're not playing the same level out there are WSU. Quote
mrags Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 10 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: This is so far from the truth. but you have the right to your opinion. At 225lbs for any LB in this league I’ll pass. RBs in the nfl will have field days with that Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted March 27, 2023 Author Posted March 27, 2023 1 minute ago, mrags said: That’s funny. That’s exactly why I’ve thought of just about every single LB in this draft not named Sewell or Campbell. I agree with this statement for the most part 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: He’s more of a Milano type. SPOT ON. Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 (edited) 10 minutes ago, mrags said: That’s funny. That’s exactly why I’ve thought of just about every single LB in this draft not named Sewell or Campbell. I’ve changed how I view ILB. I don’t want the size to take on linemen I want length for coverage. Henley has 33 inch arms, which are the longest of the top LBs. Edited March 27, 2023 by Buffalo_Stampede Quote
947 Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 Henley looks like an exact clone of Terrel Bernard. Watch their highlights, it's like you're watching the same player. Same size too. This doesn't look like a round 2-3 player to me. Late round pick, sure. Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted March 27, 2023 Author Posted March 27, 2023 2 minutes ago, 947 said: Henley looks like an exact clone of Terrel Bernard. Watch their highlights, it's like you're watching the same player. Same size too. This doesn't look like a round 2-3 player to me. Late round pick, sure. every scout report, profile has him round 2-3. i really don't know where your getting this info Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, 947 said: Henley looks like an exact clone of Terrel Bernard. Watch their highlights, it's like you're watching the same player. Same size too. This doesn't look like a round 2-3 player to me. Late round pick, sure. I honestly don’t know why we’re so down on Bernard? Such a mystery to me. 1 Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 26 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: This is so far from the truth. but you have the right to your opinion. So your opinion is truth? 😂 1 1 Quote
OldTimer1960 Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 Get ready for MLB to be a problem this season. I agree that they could not responsibly pay Edmunds enough for him to stay, but man, options to replace him in FA and the draft are slim. Many of the LBs in the draft are undersized for inside and the few with size (Campbell, Sanders, and Simpson) all have holes in their game somewhere and all would be at least modest reaches at the end of round 1, but will likely all be gone before Bills’ 2nd round pick. 1 1 Quote
mannc Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 16 minutes ago, boyst said: compared to even a west coast UCLA, USC it's small but compared to the big ten, acc, sec schools - yes. those dudes are battle tested. you're not playing the same level out there are WSU. Not the same level as the ACC??😀 Quote
OldTimer1960 Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: I honestly don’t know why we’re so down on Bernard? Such a mystery to me. For me, it’s mainly that he is very undersized, especially for inside backer. Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 (edited) 15 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: every scout report, profile has him round 2-3. i really don't know where your getting this info You’re…annoying isn’t it? Edited March 27, 2023 by TheWeatherMan 1 Quote
John from Riverside Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 1 hour ago, mrags said: No thank you. Same problems as Edmund’s but he’s smaller and less powerful. Noah Sewell please You do not want this player in Buffalo Quote
boyst Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 6 minutes ago, mannc said: Not the same level as the ACC??😀 The acc has some good schools and plays out of confederation games that are generally challenging Quote
mannc Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, boyst said: The acc has some good schools and plays out of confederation games that are generally challenging In other words, exactly like the PAC 12 (or 10). PAC 12 had 25 players drafted in 2022; ACC had 21. They are basically the same. There is the SEC and Big 10 and then there's everyone else. Edited March 27, 2023 by mannc Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 1 hour ago, PrimeTime101 said: At the College Level Toughness and speed are words used when talking about Henley. Last Season he had 106 tackles, 3 forced fumbles, broken up pass and an INT. Considered a 3 down starter and runs a 4.54(second best among the top 5 ILBS in draft) at the senior bowl he shined in coverage using his 33" arms(tops among the top 5). We are talking about a football smart ILB that many feel his head is on a swivel while out there. Size 6'1 225LBS 33" Arms Pro's Explosive first step Not just fast but quick too Athletic Has a good eye in coverage Athletic High upside Explosive Finisher (Flawless victory, Fatality ) no, but seriously, this is where I thought we lacked with Edmunds. Con's He is not a traditional ILB (loves coverage style defenses more than blitzing) He needs to learn the art of being a stack ILB Raw Needs work with hitting the right gap (Don't panic and think of Edmunds same issue here... this is very common for a young ILB) Footwork Does not read QB's eyes well (this is a good and bad thing) It means he does not jump on plays as much, but it also means he does not bite as much either. I think this one could fall right into our lap. 2-3 round projections.. as far as I am concerned? winner winner, chicken dinner So he's another big strong safety like Tremaine? We only use 1 traditional LB anyway in our dime. I still think it will be Campbell or Sanders early. Quote
boyst Posted March 27, 2023 Posted March 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, mannc said: In other words, exactly like the PAC 12 (or 10) the best 3 teams in the pac 12 are not as good as the best 3 in the acc, for example. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.