Your choice as of today, for Pick #27, limited to players who are likely available to select?

[L Ron Burgundy]

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Geez. So you’re trying to upgrade Gabe Davis, Ryan Bates, Spencer Brown, James Cook, and Ed Oliver in this draft? And also fill starting MLB?

 

He said any of the following not all.   I think all those players are fair to question at this point.  I think we have a lot of holes to fill.

[Buffalo_Stampede]

27 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

He said any of the following not all.   I think all those players are fair to question at this point.  I think we have a lot of holes to fill.

We’re not upgrading any of them this year. Key word is upgrade. No one we draft is starting over any of the players mentioned. The only possibility is Spencer Brown.
 

And we don’t have a lot of holes to fill. Minus MLB we’re deeper than we were last season as the Super Bowl favorites.

Edited March 27, 2023 by Buffalo_Stampede

[78thealltimegreat]

Looks like with Damien Harris and Taylor Rapp signings take RB and DB officially off the table thank goodness. 
So positional OL,DL,TE,WR,MLB.

Seems like the most logical choices.

I still want Hyatt then Kincaid then Sanders then Schmitz in a perfect world. 

[L Ron Burgundy]

55 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

We’re not upgrading any of them this year. Key word is upgrade. No one we draft is starting over any of the players mentioned. The only possibility is Spencer Brown.
 

And we don’t have a lot of holes to fill. Minus MLB we’re deeper than we were last season as the Super Bowl favorites.

Agree to disagree.   With everything.   We should absolutely be aiming to upgrade at least 2 of the positions highlighted.  Whether it works out or not who knows. Saying we're deeper is also super suspect.   I could argue we haven't improved anywhere.  It's not as if we gained several all pros.  We signed some ok castoffs.

[Chaos]

15 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I think what you’re looking for is the best combination of football IQ and explosive athletic ability. GMs and scouts lean towards the explosive athlete. Jack Campbell doesn’t look like an explosive athlete on film but his testing says otherwise. He’s under control and does his job. I think the Bills would feel comfortable taking him at 27 do to the testing.

 

I think they can get him trading down.

Bold added by me.  I think you have nailed what has been confusing people.  People confuse under control with slow.  This is an instance where measurables matter.