Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I wish you happiness, friend, but this no way to get there.  Religious bigotry is not cool.  I'll pray for you regardless, but consider:

 

No tolerance, no peace.  Know tolerance, know peace.  

 

 

 

I wrote something bigoted about religion?

In the past, I may have said something against someone who falsely cloaked themselves in religion, for example Trump.

Take the time he said “Nobody reads the Bible more than me.” 

Literally no one believes that if they have an IQ over 90.

Now I'm your "friend" until you prove what a phony you are next time.

Are you one of those self-proclaimed Evangelists who hasn't been in a church in many years?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

In his life, a couple of things you'd be embarrassed about if it were you, unless you too are a sociopath, but I'm glad you raised that point because it's pure bullshiite.

The proof of that is if he is found guilty of the serious charges he's facing, you won't accept the verdict and you'll remain with him.

Tell me I'm wrong.

 

All you do is project, much like your lord and savior.

 

You're talking a lot, but you're not saying thing. *TH

Has any Democrat who lost the Presidency ever failed to concede when it was ruled that they lost?

Trump still hasn't and neither have some of the dolts here. 

This is delightful.  The entire democrat establishment, including the popular vote president, suggested the elections was stolen for the duration of Trump's presidency.   Hillary conceded, heart broken, dreams dashed and immediately joined a 4 year campaign alleging the election was stolen. 

 

Was Trump elected fairly in 2016? Did he steal the election?  Do tell. 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

This is delightful.  The entire democrat establishment, including the popular vote president, suggested the elections was stolen for the duration of Trump's presidency.   Hillary conceded, heart broken, dreams dashed and immediately joined a 4 year campaign alleging the election was stolen. 

 

Was Trump elected fairly in 2016? Did he steal the election?  Do tell. 

 

 

 

 

 

Hoax.  None of that, like, actually happened. 

Edited by SectionC3
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

In order for a cult to exist, there must be a leader who can't be contradicted. 

Obviously, Trump is that.

Who is the equivalent on the other side? 

 

He can't answer that truthfully. It would cause a short circuit.

He can only say what about....


 

Literally every conservative on this board has said they aren’t voting Trump or at least rushed to his defense.   
 

Trump isn’t what’s being defended or scrutinized. 
 

It’s the police state that’s going after him - the political opposition - of all this was reversed what would you say about Trump.  We all know.  “This is worse then Nazi Germany.”

 

And they are dragging out the soap opera to coincide with elections.  

 

 

But I’ll ask again since you didn’t answer the first time - what’s Trump guilty of?  

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Attorney General Cruz is going to be very busy in DeSantis first term……

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Libs don’t understand the actions of this administration set a precedent they haven’t even contemplated yet.   

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

I wrote something bigoted about religion?

In the past, I may have said something against someone who falsely cloaked themselves in religion, for example Trump.

Take the time he said “Nobody reads the Bible more than me.” 

Literally no one believes that if they have an IQ over 90.

Now I'm your "friend" until you prove what a phony you are next time.

Are you one of those self-proclaimed Evangelists who hasn't been in a church in many years?

You're wrong. I will accept a guilty verdict. I honestly hope the prosecution has enough to do this. But dang man, it's been 7yrs of this and it's growing old on everyone, including many independents. You either have the goods on him or you don't. Get'r done

 

You're claiming he's already guilty and should be strung up before due process runs it course. Isn't that what you've posted?

2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Libs don’t understand the actions of this administration set a precedent they haven’t even contemplated yet.   

This is so very true and has hurt the nation for decades, if not centuries, to come

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

what’s Trump guilty of?

Remains to be determined. You know, innocent until and all that.

What do I think of the cases filed against him?

- NY case based on falsifying a business record (the Stormy Daniels payoff): stupid case to bring. Bragg has an arguable legal theory, but it's a stretch. Stupid anyway.

- Classified documents case: looks solid to me. Trump's main defense ("I'm the President, I can declassify anything just by thinking about it") refuted by his own recorded words. Some non-LOL defenses here, and a very favorable judge for him, but it looks solid to me. 

- Jan 6 case that's being worked up now: also seems like a strong theory. Keep in mind that there's Trump the Candidate and Trump the President. He blurred the two more than anyone else in history. He sought to intimidate election officials to find him votes. And we'll see, but it appears that Smith will have a witness or two willing to testify that he knew he lost, showing that his statements were not of the order of "since I know I got more votes than Biden, I need you to keep working to count them accurately," but rather on the order of "go out there as a good Republican and help me perpetrate a fraud."

Edited by The Frankish Reich
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Remains to be determined. You know, innocent until and all that.

What do I think of the cases filed against him?

- NY case based on falsifying a business record (the Stormy Daniels payoff): stupid case to bring. Bragg has an arguable legal theory, but it's a stretch. Stupid anyway.

- Classified documents case: looks solid to me. Trump's main defense ("I'm the President, I can declassify anything just by thinking about it") refuted by his own recorded words. Some non-LOL defenses here, and a very favorable judge for him, but it looks solid to me. 

- Jan 6 case that's being worked up now: also seems like a strong theory. Keep in mind that there's Trump the Candidate and Trump the President. He blurred the two more than anyone else in history. He sought to intimidate election officials to find him votes. And we'll see, but it appears that Smith will have a witness of two willing to testify that he knew he lost, showing that his statements were not of the order of "since I know I got more votes than Biden, I need you to keep working to count them accurately," but rather on the order of "go out there as a good Republican and help me perpetrate a fraud."


 

And all of this is complete bull ***t.

 

Banana Republic level embarrassing.   
 

 

Stormy Daniels 

Classified documents that is beyond laughable 

January 6 - go ahead quote the other things he said about going home.  

  • Disagree 1
Posted (edited)

No, but AG Cruz will. 
 

Wooooooo hoooooooo lawfare forever!

 

 

‘Merica!!! 

 

4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

it's been his entire life.  but how long did it take to get Al Capone in jail?  Some criminals are good at getting away with stuff.


 

Sometimes it takes awhile to make up crimes.  
 

 

 

Another good question.  
 

This is why they’re fleeing to State Run Threads. 
 

 

 

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Literally every conservative on this board has said they aren’t voting Trump or at least rushed to his defense.   
 

Trump isn’t what’s being defended or scrutinized. 
 

It’s the police state that’s going after him - the political opposition - of all this was reversed what would you say about Trump.  We all know.  “This is worse then Nazi Germany.”

 

And they are dragging out the soap opera to coincide with elections.  

 

 

But I’ll ask again since you didn’t answer the first time - what’s Trump guilty of?  

You aren’t a conservative.  At best you’re a conservacommie. 

25 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

You're wrong. I will accept a guilty verdict. I honestly hope the prosecution has enough to do this. But dang man, it's been 7yrs of this and it's growing old on everyone, including many independents. You either have the goods on him or you don't. Get'r done

 

You're claiming he's already guilty and should be strung up before due process runs it course. Isn't that what you've posted?

This is so very true and has hurt the nation for decades, if not centuries, to come

Hoax.  This hasn’t been going on for seven years.  The conduct now in question occurred after November 2020. 

Edited by SectionC3
Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

This is delightful.  The entire democrat establishment, including the popular vote president, suggested the elections was stolen for the duration of Trump's presidency.   Hillary conceded, heart broken, dreams dashed and immediately joined a 4 year campaign alleging the election was stolen. 

 

Was Trump elected fairly in 2016? Did he steal the election?  Do tell. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Never an answer from you. Always what about......

Posted
43 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Literally every conservative on this board has said they aren’t voting Trump or at least rushed to his defense.   
 

Trump isn’t what’s being defended or scrutinized. 
 

It’s the police state that’s going after him - the political opposition - of all this was reversed what would you say about Trump.  We all know.  “This is worse then Nazi Germany.”

 

And they are dragging out the soap opera to coincide with elections.  

 

 

But I’ll ask again since you didn’t answer the first time - what’s Trump guilty of?  

 

I already answered. You can read it.

Yes, all the folks defending Trump here won't be voting for him. Sure.

In one breath you fume about the Democrats and treat Trump like he's an innocent.

In another, you say none of you will vote for him.

 

If he isn't guilty of anything and the Democrats are evil, why wouldn't you vote for him?

This is an extreme logic failure, but I'm used to that.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Kemp said:

 

If he isn't guilty of anything and the Democrats are evil, why wouldn't you vote for him?

This is an extreme logic failure, but I'm used to that.

 

I honestly didn't vote for him in either 2016 or 2020. I won't be voting for him in 2024 either.

 

His character doesn't deserve my vote, whether he's guilty of a crime or not. I made that decision 8yrs ago.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Attorney General Cruz is going to be very busy in DeSantis first term……

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Libs don’t understand the actions of this administration set a precedent they haven’t even contemplated yet.   


Yeah, who can forget that it was too late to put Garland on the Supreme Court, but wasn't too late, even though it was much later, when it flipped.

Cruz is busy now investigating Barbie.

By the way, would you suck off a man who insulted your wife, like Cruz did?

Posted
24 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

You aren’t a conservative.  At best you’re a conservacommie. 

Hoax.  This hasn’t been going on for seven years.  The conduct now in question occurred after November 2020. 

Now do russia, russia, russia

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Never an answer from you. Always what about......

There's an answer it there, Kemp, stop screaming at clouds and read for understanding. 

 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

I already answered. You can read it.

Yes, all the folks defending Trump here won't be voting for him. Sure.

In one breath you fume about the Democrats and treat Trump like he's an innocent.

In another, you say none of you will vote for him.

 

If he isn't guilty of anything and the Democrats are evil, why wouldn't you vote for him?

This is an extreme logic failure, but I'm used to that.

 


 

Um…..because a good chunk of the electorate is voting on “no more drama please and stay off Twitter.”

 

×
×
  • Create New...