BillStime Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 You know the cult is freaking out - karma is a bich
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 3 hours ago, Pokebball said: Why the struggle with due process? Why are lefties wanting to "string him up" before? That's just pathetic.. 2 hours ago, BillStime said: ETTD Everything he touches turns to shite...beware MAGA's.
Wacka Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 All this fake elector BS. Either party can submita slate of electors to the Senate. It is up to the President of the Senate (VP) to determine which slate is accepted. The only fakes are the current POTUS and VP. Neither are qualified to hold those office, such less ANY elected office. 1
ChiGoose Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 Just now, Wacka said: All this fake elector BS. Either party can submita slate of electors to the Senate. It is up to the President of the Senate (VP) to determine which slate is accepted. The only fakes are the current POTUS and VP. Neither are qualified to hold those office, such less ANY elected office. Well this is 100% wrong but you do you, buddy
Big Blitz Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 Yo……why were all the January 6, 2021 locked down protesters mad again? What gave them the idea that the election could be overturned? Was it Trump? Oh….. It’s probably scraped from State run Google - but Keith Olberman spent a good month after the 2004 election claiming the voting machines in Ohio were rigged because they were tied to a company that supported Bush.
Kemp Posted July 19, 2023 Author Posted July 19, 2023 (edited) 10 hours ago, Pokebball said: Why the struggle with due process? Why are lefties wanting to "string him up" before? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/06/28/jan-6-hearing-trump-thought-pence-deserved-chants-to-hang-him-aide-says.html Remember Lock Her Up? Edited July 19, 2023 by Kemp
Tiberius Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 39 minutes ago, BillStime said: Ouch Whelp! There it is
The Frankish Reich Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 8 hours ago, Big Blitz said: It’s probably scraped from State run Google - but Keith Olberman spent a good month after the 2004 election claiming the voting machines in Ohio were rigged because they were tied to a company that supported Bush. And you know what didn't happen? Hillary Clinton didn't try to put together slates of Fake Electors (the exact term used by the Michigan Republicans) to submit false declarations stating under oath that they are the duly elected electors of their states. And the rest of the comments are about the old issue of "faithless electors" - again, individuals who WERE duly elected in their states, but who then refuse to cast their electoral votes for the candidate they ostensibly supported. Not at all the same thing, and (with respect to state laws binding duly elected electors to vote for the candidate they supported), not an issue that was decided by the Supreme Court until 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiafalo_v._Washington#:~:text=The Court ruled unanimously%2C by,in the state of Washington. Deflection, deflection, deflection ... 1 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 Just now, The Frankish Reich said: And you know what didn't happen? Hillary Clinton didn't try to put together slates of Fake Electors (the exact term used by the Michigan Republicans) to submit false declarations stating under oath that they are the duly elected electors of their states. And the rest of the comments are about the old issue of "faithless electors" - again, individuals who WERE duly elected in their states, but who then refuse to cast their electoral votes for the candidate they ostensibly supported. Not at all the same thing, and (with respect to state laws binding duly elected electors to vote for the candidate they supported), not an issue that was decided by the Supreme Court until 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiafalo_v._Washington#:~:text=The Court ruled unanimously%2C by,in the state of Washington. Deflection, deflection, deflection ... tell us more about RESIST, Russia gate, crossfire hurricane, Mueller, summer of rage and more. 1 1 1
The Frankish Reich Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 26 minutes ago, Chris farley said: tell us more about RESIST, Russia gate, crossfire hurricane, Mueller, summer of rage and more. None of that compares with trying to manipulate the actual mechanics of the electoral process, knowingly putting forth slates of "fake electors" (their term!), etc. Those are all things about trying to influence how people vote. Russian misinformation (which happened), Democrats publicizing a sketchy fake intel report (which happened) - all of that is in the category of dirty tricks to try to get people to vote a certain way. This was a deliberate attempt to ignore the results of those votes. It is not even close to the same thing. It had never happened before in the history of the republic. And I hope it never happens again, but that's what's so dangerous here: one side ignores established norms, next time around the other side says "why not us?" 1 1 3
Big Blitz Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said: And you know what didn't happen? Hillary Clinton didn't try to put together slates of Fake Electors (the exact term used by the Michigan Republicans) to submit false declarations stating under oath that they are the duly elected electors of their states. And the rest of the comments are about the old issue of "faithless electors" - again, individuals who WERE duly elected in their states, but who then refuse to cast their electoral votes for the candidate they ostensibly supported. Not at all the same thing, and (with respect to state laws binding duly elected electors to vote for the candidate they supported), not an issue that was decided by the Supreme Court until 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiafalo_v._Washington#:~:text=The Court ruled unanimously%2C by,in the state of Washington. Deflection, deflection, deflection ... Lol what???? Then what the hell were these Democrats calling to have happen?? ”The election doesn’t count! Overturn it! Do not certify him! But um, we don’t really mean that.” You all have lost your dam mind. Not surprising since you not only have to justify devastating flu season policies, and the subsequent ***t show election season 2020 that was conducted under the guise of “we need to mail all a ballot because you’ll die if we don’t. And Trump can’t have rallies it’s a health risk.” Edited July 19, 2023 by Big Blitz 1 1 2
The Frankish Reich Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 8 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Then what the hell were these Democrats calling to have happen?? ”The election doesn’t count! Overturn it! Do not certify him! But um, we don’t really mean that.” And did any of that actually happen? NO. Compare what we now know happened in Michigan. They knowingly put forth a slate of "fake electors," even using that very term. YES. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 36 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: None of that compares with trying to manipulate the actual mechanics of the electoral process, knowingly putting forth slates of "fake electors" (their term!), etc. Those are all things about trying to influence how people vote. Russian misinformation (which happened), Democrats publicizing a sketchy fake intel report (which happened) - all of that is in the category of dirty tricks to try to get people to vote a certain way. This was a deliberate attempt to ignore the results of those votes. It is not even close to the same thing. It had never happened before in the history of the republic. And I hope it never happens again, but that's what's so dangerous here: one side ignores established norms, next time around the other side says "why not us?" Crossfire hurricane alone, is in comparison. 9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: And did any of that actually happen? NO. Compare what we now know happened in Michigan. They knowingly put forth a slate of "fake electors," even using that very term. YES. play dumb games, win dumb prizes. Got a feeling the morons that rioted and tried to stop trumps swearing in feel similar. Violence flares in Washington during Trump inauguration | Reuters 1
Big Blitz Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 8 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: And did any of that actually happen? NO. Compare what we now know happened in Michigan. They knowingly put forth a slate of "fake electors," even using that very term. YES. Oh yes it freaking did - before and then after the 2016 election due to unprecedented Deep State weaponization of the Federal Government to set up, investigate, incriminate, and indict (lawfare) a private citizen running for POTUS "The one that the FBI relied on most heavily was its claim that there was some sort of well-developed conspiracy between Trump and Russia," he said. "Now, there has not been any evidence uncovered, whether it was by special counsel Mueller, by the DOJ inspector general, or now by Durham, that there was any sort of collusion between Trump and Russia." "The FBI relied on that dossier to obtain spy warrants through the foreign intelligence surveillance court to surveil former Trump campaign associate Carter Page. They also relied on the dossier in other ways. Former FBI Director James Comey even wanted to include the dossier in an intelligence community assessment that was put out in very early January 2017 about Russia's meddling in the 2016 election," Dunleavy said. Along with the FBI's reliance on the dossier, the Durham investigation showcased a host of actions the FBI took in Crossfire Hurricane that now reflect poorly on what many consider to be America's top law enforcement agency, according to Dunleavy…. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/jerry-dunleavy-crossfire-hurricane-john-durham-cspan 1
The Frankish Reich Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 1 minute ago, Big Blitz said: Oh yes it freaking did - before and then after the 2016 election due to unprecedented Deep State weaponization of the Federal Government to set up, investigate, incriminate, and indict (lawfare) a private citizen running for POTUS "The one that the FBI relied on most heavily was its claim that there was some sort of well-developed conspiracy between Trump and Russia," he said. "Now, there has not been any evidence uncovered, whether it was by special counsel Mueller, by the DOJ inspector general, or now by Durham, that there was any sort of collusion between Trump and Russia." "The FBI relied on that dossier to obtain spy warrants through the foreign intelligence surveillance court to surveil former Trump campaign associate Carter Page. They also relied on the dossier in other ways. Former FBI Director James Comey even wanted to include the dossier in an intelligence community assessment that was put out in very early January 2017 about Russia's meddling in the 2016 election," Dunleavy said. Along with the FBI's reliance on the dossier, the Durham investigation showcased a host of actions the FBI took in Crossfire Hurricane that now reflect poorly on what many consider to be America's top law enforcement agency, according to Dunleavy…. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/jerry-dunleavy-crossfire-hurricane-john-durham-cspan I get it. He is indicted for you. The Messiah. 2 2 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 19, 2023 Posted July 19, 2023 15 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I get it. He is indicted for you. The Messiah. I've only recently taken the label cult seriously. but it is what it is. 1 2
Recommended Posts