Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 3 Posted January 3 Just now, Pokebball said: You know, some of us are really exhausted by all of the telegraphing. We've had 7 1/2 years of telegraphing. Out in Wyoming I call that all hat, and no cattle! so u'd rather him indict him now for those crimes?
Pokebball Posted January 3 Posted January 3 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: so u'd rather him indict him now for those crimes? Prove his guilt and lock him up, or let's move on for Pistol Pete's sake. 1
John from Riverside Posted January 3 Posted January 3 1 hour ago, Doc said: What ruling? What dictatorial things are you thinking he's going to do (that he didn't do the first time)? Dems are always saying that Trump/Repubs will end democracy. Again he specifically said "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." That sentence didn't make it into his speech by accident. The difference is you don’t see Democrats storming the capital
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 3 Posted January 3 Just now, Pokebball said: Prove his guilt and lock him up, or let's move on for Pistol Pete's sake. We'd love to. tell him to stop stalling.
Pokebball Posted January 3 Posted January 3 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: We'd love to. tell him to stop stalling. How much more time do you need? He's got a right to a speedy trial.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 3 Posted January 3 Just now, Pokebball said: He's got a right to a speedy trial. he wants it to last past the election so he can pardon himself. it's you , not us. do u agree with his tactic?
ChiGoose Posted January 4 Posted January 4 12 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: he wants it to last past the election so he can pardon himself. it's you , not us. do u agree with his tactic? It is pretty evident that Trump’s legal strategy is not about winning his cases. It’s just to delay them as much as possible hoping he can get elected president before facing any judgment. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 4 Posted January 4 (edited) Just now, ChiGoose said: It is pretty evident that Trump’s legal strategy is not about winning his cases. It’s just to delay them as much as possible hoping he can get elected president before facing any judgment. yes, and we know maga's will never publicly condemn anything he does. they believe he's going to help them.....lol Edited January 4 by Joe Ferguson forever
Tenhigh Posted January 4 Posted January 4 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: yes, and we know maga's will never publicly condemn anything he does. they believe he's going to help them.....lol Trump is a POS. I want him to stop stalling so the Republicans can get a viable candidate on the ticket. I also want those on the left to speed it up, I feel like some of these cases ar le being intentionally slow walked to screw with the 2024 rep ticket. 1
John from Riverside Posted January 4 Posted January 4 59 minutes ago, Pokebball said: How much more time do you need? He's got a right to a speedy trial. This is confusing to me The prosecution would like nothing more than to get this trial started tomorrow Trump is using every delay tactic he can find I would love to hear an explanation of why I shouldn’t think that Trump is trying to use delay tactics 1
Tenhigh Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, John from Riverside said: This is confusing to me The prosecution would like nothing more than to get this trial started tomorrow Trump is using every delay tactic he can find There is a very sweet spot for the dems on any kind of Trump conviction John If you don't think both sides are playing politics here I'd suggest you reconsider your opinion on the topic. 1
Pokebball Posted January 4 Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: This is confusing to me The prosecution would like nothing more than to get this trial started tomorrow Trump is using every delay tactic he can find Now do the 7 1/2 year old claims
John from Riverside Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, Tenhigh said: There is a very sweet spot for the dems on any kind of Trump conviction John If you don't think both sides are playing politics here I'd suggest you reconsider your opinion on the topic. Oh, I have no doubt, believing that both sides are playing politics here But this is a federal criminal trial trials you don’t bring those up unless you have proof like ironclad proof I am here is Trump is in fact delaying
Tenhigh Posted January 4 Posted January 4 Just now, John from Riverside said: Oh, I have no doubt, believing that both sides are playing politics here But this is a federal criminal trial trials you don’t bring those up unless you have proof like ironclad proof I am here is Trump is in fact delaying Of course he is. So is Smith.
John from Riverside Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Pokebball said: Now do the 7 1/2 year old claims I moved past those once received Mueller’s report We are talking about federal criminal indictments, not political ones now Withholding classified documents, and trying to hide them is a crime it’s not a political crime. It’s a send you to a pound me in the ass prison crime Just now, Tenhigh said: Of course he is. So is Smith. Explain to me how Smith is delaying 1
Tenhigh Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said: I moved past those once received Mueller’s report We are talking about federal criminal indictments, not political ones now Withholding classified documents, and trying to hide them is a crime it’s not a political crime. It’s a send you to a pound me in the ass prison crime Explain to me how Smith is delaying The fact that the trial wasn't scheduled to start until this year, for one. If he had all of the ironclad proof you describe he could have done this 6 months ago. I think his goal is to let Trump get the nomination before he is convicted.
John from Riverside Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Tenhigh said: The fact that the trial wasn't scheduled to start until this year, for one. If he had all of the ironclad proof you describe he could have done this 6 months ago. I think his goal is to let Trump get the nomination before he is convicted. You do realize that there are a bunch of other factors regarding that the judges have to clear time on their schedules they have to make their case If anything, delaying hurts Jack Smith’s pace because it comes perilously close to the election, and that’s not counting appeals, the possibility of Trump winning, and then pardon himself is very real because of the timeframe I am kind of curious on how do people feel if Trump is convicted of these crimes and then pardons himself? Are they still gonna play partisan politics on that?
Tenhigh Posted January 4 Posted January 4 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said: You do realize that there are a bunch of other factors regarding that the judges have to clear time on their schedules they have to make their case If anything, delaying hurts Jack Smith’s pace because it comes perilously close to the election, and that’s not counting appeals, the possibility of Trump winning, and then pardon himself is very real because of the timeframe I am kind of curious on how do people feel if Trump is convicted of these crimes and then pardons himself? Are they still gonna play partisan politics on that? Whatever you say John.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 4 Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: I moved past those once received Mueller’s report We are talking about federal criminal indictments, not political ones now Withholding classified documents, and trying to hide them is a crime it’s not a political crime. It’s a send you to a pound me in the ass prison crime Not true. Withholding classified documents is arguably a run of the mill non-event, regardless of how and why they were taken into possession, regardless of whether or not classified material was potentially accessed by people without clearance, whether the handling was reckless or items vital to our national security are lost track of, and whether or not a pattern of behavior can be assumed when material are removed over multiple years from multiple different locations, so long as the Sergeant Schulz defense is raised. 1
Pokebball Posted January 4 Posted January 4 36 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: I moved past those once received Mueller’s report We are talking about federal criminal indictments, not political ones now Withholding classified documents, and trying to hide them is a crime it’s not a political crime. It’s a send you to a pound me in the ass prison crime Explain to me how Smith is delaying LOL you thinking these aren't political
Recommended Posts