Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

The Walls Are (Once Again) 'Closing in' on Trump

by Joe Cunningham

 

It would appear that there was a bit of news yesterday, and there is something of a divide in the legal pundit community as to whether or not Alvin Bragg is able to pull off his grand caper – stealing a conviction through an Ocean’s 11-style legal plot.

 

Most legal pundits on the right are arguing that the case is anything but solid. In fact, you’d be hard-pressed to find even the most Trump-skeptical of center-right pundits arguing that this case is on solid ground. At National Review, you have Dan McLaughlin, Jeff Blehar, and Andrew McCarthy (among others) having their previous analyses of the case pretty much proven by the unsealed indictment and statement of facts. McCarthy’s write-up in the aftermath of the arraignment is just brutal.

 

Even on the left, you have legal analysts like Ian Millhiser at Vox saying the case is weak 

 

But the press, after its initial disappointment, is slowly getting back on board the “Walls Are Closing In” narrative as Trump prepares not just for this legal battle, but the multitude of others he faces. POLITICO’s Morning Playbook is a stellar example of this, starting with the headline “Trump’s criminal reckoning begins” and working from there.

 

(as Nedboy's post shows)

 

But those other investigations are where the press will go next, using Bragg’s indictment of Trump as the launchpad to say that all of Trump’s legal issues are really going to start rolling in. And while, on a technical level, that is not an incorrect assessment, it’s still done to craft a narrative that the walls are, indeed, closing in on Trump, despite the fact that we are still a long way away from the walls even budging.

 

That narrative-crafting undermines the reality of the situation as much as Bragg has because those same journalists are creating an expectation that, any moment now, the Feds will haul Trump off and he’ll never be a threat to any of us ever again.

 

https://redstate.com/joesquire/2023/04/05/the-walls-are-once-again-closing-in-on-trump-n726776

Posted
34 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

That narrative-crafting undermines the reality of the situation as much as Bragg has because those same journalists are creating an expectation that, any moment now, the Feds will haul Trump off and he’ll never be a threat to any of us ever again.

 

https://redstate.com/joesquire/2023/04/05/the-walls-are-once-again-closing-in-on-trump-n726776


 

I’m still waiting for a leftist to explain what that fascist threat of Trump was.  
 

His Tweets.  That’s the actual answer.  His tweets.   

Posted
20 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

I’m still waiting for a leftist to explain what that fascist threat of Trump was.  
 

His Tweets.  That’s the actual answer.  His tweets.   

 

You probably missed his trying to overthrow the government. Can't get more fascist than that.

It was an easy story to miss, if you're blind and deaf.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

You probably missed his trying to overthrow the government. Can't get more fascist than that.

It was an easy story to miss, if you're blind and deaf.

Hell he called the election he won rigged, you know just in case.

Posted
1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

You probably missed his trying to overthrow the government. Can't get more fascist than that.

It was an easy story to miss, if you're blind and deaf.


 

Or you were told that’s what happened and have an IQ under 65.  
 

To the rest of us, that was a protest where 200 people were allowed a tour of the Capital.  
 

Keep being a good useful idiot and parrot the narrative you need your fellow 65 IQ to follow.  
 


 

The rest of us also saw the Government officially overthrown and it’s Republic thrown out the window in March 2020.  In other words, the MAGA “fascist” posed zero threat to America. 
 

 

87 genders party on the other hand?   Yea.  
 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

"HE TOLD THEM TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT!"  Except nowhere did he ever say that.  And if he had, he probably would have told them to bring weapons, if not F-15s and nukes, which is what it would take to overthrown even Ukraine's government.  Oh and he probably would have told them to make sure they stayed and finished the job, not leave before dinner rezzies.

Edited by Doc
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Or you were told that’s what happened and have an IQ under 65.  
 

To the rest of us, that was a protest where 200 people were allowed a tour of the Capital.  
 

Keep being a good useful idiot and parrot the narrative you need your fellow 65 IQ to follow.  
 


 

The rest of us also saw the Government officially overthrown and it’s Republic thrown out the window in March 2020.  In other words, the MAGA “fascist” posed zero threat to America. 
 

 

87 genders party on the other hand?   Yea.  
 


Why did so many people get injured and killed? 
 

Quite the tour

 

af.thumb.JPG.68cdf6aa8e6275d8897957a85cb07b92.JPGsdf.thumb.JPG.402c9abe192de31083e74bf903da8681.JPGimage.thumb.jpeg.b1a826db1836357459ef12fa8db5f30b.jpeg

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, BillStime said:

 

How many people died that day?

 


 

You said killed - who was killed, by who, and how?  
 

And where is the Nashville Manifesto 

Posted
Just now, Big Blitz said:


 

You said killed - who was killed, by who, and how?  
 

And where is the Nashville Manifesto 

 

Doesn't matter - people died that day... how many?

 

And I don't control the Manifesto - ask your Daddy.

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Doesn't matter - people died that day... how many?

 

Doesn’t matter???

 

 

Who????

 

 

 

 

30 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

And I don't control the Manifesto - ask your Daddy.

 


 

Your daddy, the State?

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

Doesn’t matter???

 

Who????

 

 

You told us:

 

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

that was a protest where 200 people were allowed a tour of the Capital.  

 

If they were "allowed" to tour the Capital; why did so many people get injured, die and killed that day?

 

Are you having a hard time keeping focus?

 

Are you going to bring up COVID now to distract even more?

 

C'mon Big BLITZ

 

 

 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Who was killed?  
 

 

 

 

Ashli Babbitt and Roseanne Boyland.  By Capitol Police.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Or you were told that’s what happened and have an IQ under 65.  
 

To the rest of us, that was a protest where 200 people were allowed a tour of the Capital.  
 

Keep being a good useful idiot and parrot the narrative you need your fellow 65 IQ to follow.  
 


 

The rest of us also saw the Government officially overthrown and it’s Republic thrown out the window in March 2020.  In other words, the MAGA “fascist” posed zero threat to America. 
 

 

87 genders party on the other hand?   Yea.  
 

 

What's scary is that people like you actually exist.

It's hard to take someone seriously if they say 1/6 was a tourist event. When you vacation, you bring poles to break into buildings and build a gallows?

Wonder how you'd react if they were breaking into your house. You'd welcome them in, right?

Who cares if they wipe their shiite on your walls. Maybe you're into that.

Only people who aren't secure in their gender are so terrified of the gender stuff.

Are you a Proud Boy?

Yeah, I'm the one with an IQ deficit.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...