Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Chris farley said:

^^^^^^^^^^^ another echo chamber of pure ignorance mixed with narcissistic bravado

 

 

 

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” - Donald Trump.

Farley calls people fascists when his leader calls for the termination of the Constitution and all he can do is spout nonsense when asked to defend his cult leader.

Posted
8 hours ago, Kemp said:

Wow!

 

I forgot when Hillary organized a rally in D.C that then stormed the Capitol

And let's not forget when she refused to tell her supporters to stop trying to hang the V.P.

========================================================================

Hillary gave a concession speech the day after the election.

Trump still can't admit he lost.

 

You know this to be true but can't admit it.

Seriously, Doc, it's when you write something that stupid, it's apparent that you can't believe what you say unless you truly are a member of a cult. 

 

Yes because the 4 years of "Russian collusion!" wasn't an attempt to overturn an election.  Clown.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
18 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Yes because the 4 years of "Russian collusion!" wasn't an attempt to overturn an election.  Clown.

 

By the way, why can't you or anyone else explain why Putin is a vocal supporter of Trump?

Why did Trump ask Russia to find dirt on Hillary?

Since there is proof that Putin did try and interfere in the election to help Trump, why do you think he did that?

 

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/putin-connected-businessman-admits-interference-in-u-s-elections

Even Republicans came to the same conclusion

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903616315/senate-releases-final-report-on-russias-interference-in-2016-election


All this evidence against Trump and you refuse to accept it.

Yet, when no evidence has come out against Joe Biden, you have decided he's guilty.

Lastly, one of my friends was a higher-up in the FBI, and he said the people he knew there were overwhelmingly Trump fans, so why is it that you believe the FBI is in the tank for Biden? 

Now we're up to the point where you reject all the evidence and say it's a conspiracy or insult me, because all of you when painted into a corner cry Conspiracy! 

That's what members of a cult do. You're a lemming.

 



 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Kemp said:

By the way, why can't you or anyone else explain why Putin is a vocal supporter of Trump?

Why did Trump ask Russia to find dirt on Hillary?

Since there is proof that Putin did try and interfere in the election to help Trump, why do you think he did that?

 

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/russias-prigozhin-admits-interfering-us-elections-2022-11-07/

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/putin-connected-businessman-admits-interference-in-u-s-elections

Even Republicans came to the same conclusion

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903616315/senate-releases-final-report-on-russias-interference-in-2016-election


All this evidence against Trump and you refuse to accept it.

Yet, when no evidence has come out against Joe Biden, you have decided he's guilty.

Lastly, one of my friends was a higher-up in the FBI, and he said the people he knew there were overwhelmingly Trump fans, so why is it that you believe the FBI is in the tank for Biden? 

Now we're up to the point where you reject all the evidence and say it's a conspiracy or insult me, because all of you when painted into a corner cry Conspiracy! 

That's what members of a cult do. You're a lemming.

 

Because he let Putin invade Ukraine.  Oh, wait a minute...

 

Trump asked Russia to find Hilly's emails because our own "investigative" MSM wouldn't do it.  But typically when you're "colluding" with someone, you don't announce it to the whole world...

 

And I'll post the meme again for you:

 

th.jpg.d2ab455bd4edad01dd2dec3334b7be8d.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Because he let Putin invade Ukraine.  Oh, wait a minute...

 

Trump asked Russia to find Hilly's emails because our own "investigative" MSM wouldn't do it.  But typically when you're "colluding" with someone, you don't announce it to the whole world...

 

And I'll post the meme again for you:

 

th.jpg.d2ab455bd4edad01dd2dec3334b7be8d.jpg

 

Typically one would not announce to the world they were colluding, but Trump is far too stupid to understand this.

 

You're talking about someone who is saying self-incriminating things every single day.

4 hours ago, Chris farley said:

you don't understand the word you are using.

 

 

 

 

 

From someone who throws around the fascism word while defending America's biggest fascist who wants to bypass the Constitution.

 

Good stuff.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Kemp said:

Typically one would not announce to the world they were colluding, but Trump is far too stupid to understand this.

 

You're talking about someone who is saying self-incriminating things every single day.

 

Right. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rcna105365

 

“The defendant has an established practice of issuing inflammatory public statements targeted at individuals or institutions that present an obstacle or challenge to him,” the special counsel's office wrote.

 

pretty difficult to argue against that.

Do they hate the first and due process?

Posted
44 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

he's losing it.  his syntax and sentence structure have always been a national embarrassment but these are serious and painfully ironic gaffes...

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/cognitively-impaired-biden-will-lead-us-into-world-war-2-warns-trump-in-gaffe-heavy-speech/

I see no cognitive decline. 
 

 

Do you see how asinine that is? Rhetorical question. You’ve quadrupled down on your Brandon diagnosis. Your former patients have my sympathies. 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

I see no cognitive decline. 
 

 

Do you see how asinine that is? Rhetorical question. You’ve quadrupled down on your Brandon diagnosis. Your former patients have my sympathies. 

 

He was reading from a teleprompter so I wonder why that was in the script? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

I see no cognitive decline. 
 

 

Do you see how asinine that is? Rhetorical question. You’ve quadrupled down on your Brandon diagnosis. Your former patients have my sympathies. 

 

I see no cognitive decline, either.

He is no more of an idiot than he's always been.

"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible." - Donald Trump

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

I see no cognitive decline, either.

He is no more of an idiot than he's always been.

"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible." - Donald Trump

yes, it's hard to decline from that starting point.

2 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

I see no cognitive decline. 
 

 

Do you see how asinine that is? Rhetorical question. You’ve quadrupled down on your Brandon diagnosis. Your former patients have my sympathies. 

Fortunately, the actual patients disagree.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

Tds is real.  See above for reference 

 

You give Farley actual incoherent quotes from Trump and he talks of Trump Derangement Syndrome because the syndrome is a perfect description of what ails Donald.

 

To be fair, Farley thinks that quote is coherent, so he seems to have the same affliction.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...