BillStime Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 No - this is impossible - TRUMP? But Joes garage - lmao - idiots 1
Doc Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 1 minute ago, Kemp said: You believe that courts will rule against the law? If Trump lucks into a Trump judge like the one who was later overruled, it could happen, but I think the pendulum has swung from Teflon Don to easy pickings. I could be wrong, but it's the first time I've had such confidence. What makes me even more confident is lstening to how the arguments supporting Trump from people like yourself have evolved from "He's innocent" to "What about blah blah blah?" LMAO at the bolded. If I had a dollar for everytime you guys said that. Yeah and you aren't defending Joke being illegally in possession of documents because he supposedly gave them back when asked...only to find more later? Again the defense being "he's a moron"? Maybe it's the stutter.
ChiGoose Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 18 minutes ago, Doc said: Meaning what term was used most often to describe what Mueller was doing. You're the first person I've heard used "conspiracy," maybe ever but at least in 5 years. If you want to argue that the media coverage was terrible, I think you and I would probably agree. I’m sticking to the actual known facts and how they apply to the law. Media narrative is a whole other thing. 1
Doc Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: If you want to argue that the media coverage was terrible, I think you and I would probably agree. I’m sticking to the actual known facts and how they apply to the law. Media narrative is a whole other thing. I agree on that. But even Congress people rarely ever used the word "conspiracy."
Joe Ferguson forever Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 3 hours ago, ChiGoose said: This would explain a lot if it’s true. Just watched it. My wife said "This is big!"
ChiGoose Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 39 minutes ago, Doc said: I agree on that. But even Congress people rarely ever used the word "conspiracy." I’m not looking to Congress for intelligent discourse. 1
Kemp Posted April 2, 2023 Author Posted April 2, 2023 41 minutes ago, Doc said: LMAO at the bolded. If I had a dollar for everytime you guys said that. Yeah and you aren't defending Joke being illegally in possession of documents because he supposedly gave them back when asked...only to find more later? Again the defense being "he's a moron"? Maybe it's the stutter. Whataboutism remains the only constant in your posts. You're irritable because you fear there's a possibility that the head of your cult may be vulnerable. Maybe it's the first time you feared it. Maybe not. 1
Doc Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, Kemp said: Whataboutism remains the only constant in your posts. You're irritable because you fear there's a possibility that the head of your cult may be vulnerable. Maybe it's the first time you feared it. Maybe not. I always laugh when someone uses "whataboutism." Not only is it a stupid term (like "sticktoitiveness") it reveals that they admit their guy did/does it too. And I've been hearing "we got him now" for the past 6 years. Like the umpteen times before, I'll wait until something happens. 1 1 1
reddogblitz Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 On 4/1/2023 at 7:20 AM, ChiGoose said: And once again, you would need to prove that Biden knew those other documents were there and intentionally did not return them. There remains zero evidence to support that. You can make assumptions and you can claim whatever you want, but so far there is nothing that could be introduced in court to show that Biden was aware of those documents and refused to turn them over. You may be right in your court of law scenario, not sure. But @Doc isn't talking about a court of law, he's talking about impeachment. And as we all know from a few years ago, impeachment is not a legal process, it's a political process. If it were me I don't think I'd feel as comfortable as you with my dog ate my homework excuse against a Republican led house. 2
ChiGoose Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 1 minute ago, reddogblitz said: You may be right in your court of law scenario, not sure. But @Doc isn't talking about a court of law, he's talking about impeachment. And as we all know from a few years ago, impeachment is not a legal process, it's a political process. If it were me I don't think I'd feel as comfortable as you with my dog ate my homework excuse against a Republican led house. Oh, I don’t care about the GOP impeaching Biden because of this. I think it’s irrelevant. I think that this GOP would impeach Biden for ordering the same meal as his wife at a restaurant if they thought it would help them. We cannot decide how to enforce the law based on how other people may react to enforcement. 1 1 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 Gotta be another lie. It's Soros and the deep state and Jewish space lasers. Our doj is so unfair. Trump decided these were no longer classified..... 1 1 2
BillStime Posted April 2, 2023 Posted April 2, 2023 2 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Oh, I don’t care about the GOP impeaching Biden because of this. I think it’s irrelevant. I think that this GOP would impeach Biden for ordering the same meal as his wife at a restaurant if they thought it would help them. We cannot decide how to enforce the law based on how other people may react to enforcement. MAGA forgets that unlike them, we do not have a cult mindset. If Biden did something wrong - impeach, charge and/or indict - who the f cares? 1 1 1
Wacka Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 8 hours ago, BillStime said: .. f'n delusional. Yes you are. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, BillStime said: MAGA forgets that unlike them, we do not have a cult mindset. If Biden did something wrong - impeach, charge and/or indict - who the f cares? Lot's of stuff I don't particularly like about Biden. Handing over documents as soon as he found them is not a big one. Plus, there are better pitchers in the bullpen. Edited April 3, 2023 by redtail hawk 1
reddogblitz Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 6 hours ago, redtail hawk said: Lot's of stuff I don't particularly like about Biden. Handing over documents as soon as he found them is not a big one. Plus, there are better pitchers in the bullpen. Like who for example?
Doc Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 4 hours ago, reddogblitz said: Like who for example? If there were, Joke wouldn't be running again. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 (edited) 5 hours ago, reddogblitz said: Like who for example? have posted several times that I hope Tim Kaine and/or Jim Webb run in the primary. Those would be my top choices. Mark Warner would also be good. Edited April 3, 2023 by redtail hawk
L Ron Burgundy Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 1 minute ago, Doc said: If there were, Joke wouldn't be running again. I don't think he'll run unless Trump does. Still time for him to back out. 1
BillsFanNC Posted April 3, 2023 Posted April 3, 2023 15 hours ago, Doc said: I always laugh when someone uses "whataboutism." Not only is it a stupid term (like "sticktoitiveness") it reveals that they admit their guy did/does it too. And I've been hearing "we got him now" for the past 6 years. Like the umpteen times before, I'll wait until something happens. I love to hear whataboutism thrown around. To me I read it as: What about principles. The person throwing out "whataboutism" usually displays zero principles.
Recommended Posts