Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Not inconvenient,  irrelevant.   Proof or bust.  Just as it should be.  Just how it will be for Trump’s trial.  Luckily there is proof of his illegal activities, especially on the documents case.  You?  Ya got nothing.   Big fat zero.

 

When a Republican is President on Inauguration Day 2025, I’ll be right back here to see how you and your dem friends, to include Hilary, Stacey abrams, pelosi etc will say it was rigged with no proof. Get over yourself, they all do it. This is get Trump TDS bs, you know it. Double standard which will lead to the downfall of this country, already starting. 

2 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

They didn't?

"We would just be sending in 'fake' electoral votes to Pence so that 'someone' in Congress can make an objection when they start counting votes, and start arguing that the 'fake' votes should be counted," Jack Wilenchik, a Phoenix-based lawyer who helped organize the pro-Trump electors in Arizona, wrote in a Dec. 8, 2020, email to Boris Epshteyn, a strategic adviser for the Trump campaign.

In a follow-up email, Mr. Wilenchik wrote that "'alternative' votes is probably a better term than 'fake' votes," adding a smiley face emoji."

----------------------------------------------------------------

Is this something you're hearing for the first time? If so, acknowledge that I am right and you were wrong.

If you were already aware of this then it's obvious what you're about.

I am glad you're angry even if your anger is misdirected.

 

The black DA hates blaqcks?

Ok so you’re taking the word of someone who has all the reason to make himself look good. Alternative electors makes more sense if they were convinced that there was foul play and were persuaded by political protected speech. You’re too dumb to understand this and you are a useful idiot to the left taking the narrative hook line and sinker. Pathetic 

Posted
12 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

When a Republican is President on Inauguration Day 2025, I’ll be right back here to see how you and your dem friends, to include Hilary, Stacey abrams, pelosi etc will say it was rigged with no proof. Get over yourself, they all do it. This is get Trump TDS bs, you know it. Double standard which will lead to the downfall of this country, already starting. 

Ok so you’re taking the word of someone who has all the reason to make himself look good. Alternative electors makes more sense if they were convinced that there was foul play and were persuaded by political protected speech. You’re too dumb to understand this and you are a useful idiot to the left taking the narrative hook line and sinker. Pathetic 

He's on tape bud.  Guilty af.  Can't be tds if it's blatantly true.  Will you cry when they call out guilty?

 

I'm fine with a republican winning as long as it's not the orange moron you're so in love with.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

When did I cheer riots?

Do you defecate on walls regularly or just when you tour the Capitol?


because I know your type. Now you’re claiming you didn’t support them cause of how bad they were. It’s hilarious. I was against the capitol riots from day one and have receipts to show it. You’re just a hypocrite 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Why did trump need a bail bondsman?

https://news.yahoo.com/cant-afford-200k-bond-lawyers-145005508.html

 

"Somewhat surprising because it means a $30,000 non-refundable payment to the bond company," Palm Beach State Attorney Dave Aronberg wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Other legal experts also questioned Trump's decision to enlist the help of the company online Thursday evening. "Why does a billionaire need the help of a bonding company?" national security lawyer Bradley Moss asked. "A man who owns resorts and a private plane can't afford a $200,000 bond?" he added.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
44 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

He's on tape bud.  Guilty af.  Can't be tds if it's blatantly true.  Will you cry when they call out guilty?

 

I'm fine with a republican winning as long as it's not the orange moron you're so in love with.  

I’m not in love with the guy, I’m a Desantis supporter, you forgot that part eh? I said If he’s guilty you have to then prosecute Biden and Hilary, I would be fine with that. The precedent has been set, if Comey let Hilary off and Biden is not going to be charged for much more blatant laws being broken (no one is allowed to take home top secret documents from the sciff as a senator yet he had them all over the place and a vice President cannot declassify but he had those top secret records to) then Trump cannot be either or justice is not blind. It clearly favors democrats. 
 

Your last sentence justifies everything I’ve been saying. Your TDS has made you so blind to the obvious injustices and attempt to burn the constitution down so that you can get orange man bad. Pathetic

Posted
1 hour ago, HamSandwhich said:

When a Republican is President on Inauguration Day 2025, I’ll be right back here to see how you and your dem friends, to include Hilary, Stacey abrams, pelosi etc will say it was rigged with no proof. Get over yourself, they all do it. This is get Trump TDS bs, you know it. Double standard which will lead to the downfall of this country, already starting. 

Ok so you’re taking the word of someone who has all the reason to make himself look good. Alternative electors makes more sense if they were convinced that there was foul play and were persuaded by political protected speech. You’re too dumb to understand this and you are a useful idiot to the left taking the narrative hook line and sinker. Pathetic 

This has been mentioned many times, but you appear to have missed it to say that you didn’t agree with the election results is not a crime. It wasn’t a crime whenever Trump did it it’s not a crime to take it to court which trumpet almost 60 times

 

But whenever your legal options have been exhausted, and you continue to try to overturn the votes of an election, which, by the way, no democrat has ever done now you’re doing something criminal

 

By the way, the Republicans are not winning the presidency the next time around Trump is not electable, and the rest of the Republican nominees are all too scared shitless of him to actually challenge him 

Posted
58 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

I’m not in love with the guy, I’m a Desantis supporter, you forgot that part eh? I said If he’s guilty you have to then prosecute Biden and Hilary, I would be fine with that. The precedent has been set, if Comey let Hilary off and Biden is not going to be charged for much more blatant laws being broken (no one is allowed to take home top secret documents from the sciff as a senator yet he had them all over the place and a vice President cannot declassify but he had those top secret records to) then Trump cannot be either or justice is not blind. It clearly favors democrats. 
 

Your last sentence justifies everything I’ve been saying. Your TDS has made you so blind to the obvious injustices and attempt to burn the constitution down so that you can get orange man bad. Pathetic

Biden and Hillary cooperated.  Not the same.  Your orange man crush is on tape admitting he's breaking the law.   Don't talk about the constitution.   If you can't comprehend fake electors it stands to reason any argument on the constitution you have will be absurd.  Prosecuting someone breaking the law is hardly burning down the constitution.  Listen to yourself.   You are so upset over the law being enforced you are not making sense.  Send money to his defense fund that will make you feel better. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
1 hour ago, aristocrat said:


because I know your type. Now you’re claiming you didn’t support them cause of how bad they were. It’s hilarious. I was against the capitol riots from day one and have receipts to show it. You’re just a hypocrite 

I know your type
 

Lol you don’t know *****

29 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Biden and Hillary cooperated.  Not the same.  Your orange man crush is on tape admitting he's breaking the law.   Don't talk about the constitution.   If you can't comprehend fake electors it stands to reason any argument on the constitution you have will be absurd.  Prosecuting someone breaking the law is hardly burning down the constitution.  Listen to yourself.   You are so upset over the law being enforced you are not making sense.  Send money to his defense fund that will make you feel better. 

You did notice that the first thing he did after he got out of Fulton county was put out some thing to collect money for a defense fund

 

Why in the ***** does a billionaire need a defense fund?

Posted
10 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I know your type
 

Lol you don’t know *****

You did notice that the first thing he did after he got out of Fulton county was put out some thing to collect money for a defense fund

 

Why in the ***** does a billionaire need a defense fund?


I feel bad for the poor kids you’re responsible for educating 

Posted
Just now, aristocrat said:


I feel bad for the poor kids you’re responsible for educating 

I feel bad for anybody that Has to talk to you on a day-to-day basis

 

Something tells me, you’re that neighbor that you never borrow anything from just because you can’t stand the site of their ***** face

Posted
Just now, John from Riverside said:

I feel bad for anybody that Has to talk to you on a day-to-day basis

 

Something tells me, you’re that neighbor that you never borrow anything from just because you can’t stand the site of their ***** face


my neighbors are sitting at the fire with me right now lol

Posted
4 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


I feel bad for the poor kids you’re responsible for educating 


pretty sure the guy just works in admissions capacity at the university of California branches not really an educator

Posted
3 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


pretty sure the guy just works in admissions capacity at the university of California branches not really an educator

Are you a veteran like myself with the names like comms vet? Did you work in the military with communications or something?
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Are you a veteran like myself with the names like comms vet? Did you work in the military with communications or something?
 

 


I’m a combat veteran joined the Army and was a commo sergeant with a line company in the infantry. 
 

You joined a branch that gives soldiers a ride to the war. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
Just now, Commsvet11 said:


I’m a combat veteran joined the Army and was a commo sergeant with a line company in the infantry. 
 

You joined a branch that gives soldiers a ride to the war. 

Thank you for your service
Too bad you’re so ignorant

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Thank you for your service
Too bad you’re so ignorant


Hey don’t forget to collect your sub standard living pay whenever your branch had to work in cooperation with real soldiers 

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Commsvet11 said:


Hey don’t forget to collect your sub standard living pay whenever your branch had to work in cooperation with real soldiers 

It's lying anyways.  Stolen valor is sick 

×
×
  • Create New...